An Equiratio Mixture Model for non-additive components: A case study for aspartame/acesulfame-K mixtures

Chemical Senses

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 1-11

  Schifferstein, Hendrik N J ^a,b  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACESULFAME; ASPARTAME; SUCROSE; SUGAR; SUGAR ALCOHOL;

ADULT; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SWEETNESS; TASTE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASPARTAME; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MALE; MODELS, CHEMICAL; SWEETENING AGENTS; TASTE; TASTE THRESHOLD; THIAZINES;

EID: 0030057571     PISSN: 0379864X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/21.1.1     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Alf, E.F. and Grossberg, J.M. (1979) The geometric mean: confidence limits and significance tests. Percept. Psychophys., 26, 419-421.
2. Ayya, N. and Lawless, H.T. (1992) Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of high-intensity sweeteners and sweetener mixtures. Chem. Senses, 17, 245-259.
3. Baird, J.C. (1991) Personal communication. Department of Psychology, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH. Reported by Berglund and Olsson (1993).
4. Bartoshuk, L.M. and Cleveland, C.T. (1977) Mixtures of substances with similar tastes: a test of a psychophysical model of taste mixture interactions Sens. Processes., 1, 177-186.
5. Beidler, L.M. (1971) Taste receptor stimulation with salts and acids. In Beidler, L.M. (ed.) Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. IV. Chemical Senses, Part 2, Taste. Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 200-220.
6. Berglund, B. and Olsson, M.J. (1993) A theoretical and empirical evaluation of perceptual and psychophysical models for odor-intensity interaction. Reports from the Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, no. 764.
7. Bonnans, S. and Noble, A.C. (1993) Effect of sweetener type and of sweetener and acid level on temporal perception of sweetness, sourness, and fruitiness. Chem. Senses, 18, 273-283.
8. De Graaf, C. and Frijters, J.E.R. (1986) A psychophysical investigation of Beidler's mixture equation. Chem. Senses, 11, 295-314.
9. De Graaf, C. and Frijters, J.E.R. (1987) Sweetness intensity of a binary sugar mixture lies between intensities of its components, when each is tasted alone and at the same total molarity as the mixture Chem. Senses, 12, 113-129.
10. De Graaf, C. and Frijters, J.E.R. (1988) Assessment of the taste interaction between two qualitatively similar-tasting substances: a comparison between comparison rules. J. Exp. Psychol : Hum. Percept Perform., 14, 526-538.
11. Eisler,H and Roskam, E.E. (1977) Multidimensional similarity: an experimental and theoretical comparison of vector, distance, and set theoretical models. I. Models and internal consistency of data. Acta Psychol., 41, 1-16.
12. Frank, R.A., Mize, S.J.S. and Carter, R. (1989) An assessment of binary mixture interactions for nine sweeteners. Chem. Senses, 14, 621-632.
13. Frijters, J.E.R. and De Graaf, C. (1987) The equiratio taste mixture model successfully predicts the sensory response to the sweetness intensity of complex mixtures of sugars and sugar alcohols. Perception, 16, 615-628
14. Frijters, J.E.R , De Graaf, C. and Koolen, H.C.M. (1984) The validity of the equiratio taste mixture model investigated with sorbitol-sucrose mixtures. Chem. Senses, 9, 241-248.
15. Frijters, J.E.R. and Oude Ophuis, P.A.M. (1983) The construction and prediction of psychophysical power functions for the sweetness of equiratio sugar mixtures Perception, 12, 753-767
16. Frijters, J.E.R. and Stevens, D.A. (1986) Psychophysical taste functions of equiratio acid mixtures. Internal report Clark University, Worcester, MA.
17. Lawless, H.T. and Stevens, D.A. (1983) Cross adaptation of sucrose and intensive sweeteners, Chem. Senses, 7, 309-315.
18. Matysaak, N.L. and Noble, A.C. (1991) Comparison of temporal perception of fruitiness in model systems sweetened with aspartame, an aspartame + acesulfame K blend, or sucrose. J. Fd Sci., 56, 823-826.
19. McBurney, D.H., Smith, D.V., and Shick, T.R. (1972) Gustatory cross adaptation: sourness and bitterness. Percept. Psychophys., 10, 228-232.
20. Meiselman, H.L. (1968) Adaptation and cross-adaptation of the four gustatory qualities Percept Psychophys., 4, 368-372.
21. Owen, W.J. and DeRouen, T.A. (1980) Estimation of the mean for lognormal data containing zeroes and left-censored values with applications to the measurement of worker exposure to air and contaminants. Biometrics, 36, 707-719.
22. Parducci, A. (1974) Contextual effects: A range-frequency analysis. In Carterette, E.C. and Friedman, M.P. (eds) Handbook of Perception. Vol. II. Psychophysical Judgment and Measurement. Academic Press, New York, pp 127-141.
23. Poulton, E C. (1979) Models for biases in judging sensory magnitude. Psychol. Bull., 86, 777-803.
24. Schifferstein, H.N.J. (1995) Prediction of sweetness intensity for equiratio aspartame/sucrose mixtures. Chem. Senses, 20, 211-219.
25. Schiffman, S.S., Cain, H. and Lindley, M.G. (1981) Multiple receptor sites mediate sweetness: Evidence from cross adaptation. Pharmacol. Biochem. & Behav., 15, 377-388.
26. Stevens, S.S. (1975) Psychophysics Wiley, New York.
27. von Rymon Lipinski, G.W. (1991) Sensory properties of acesulfame-K. In: Mayer, D.G and Kemper, F.H. (eds) Acesulfame-K. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 197-207.
28. Williams, R.B.G. (1986) Intermediate Statistics for Geographers and Earth Scientists. Macmillan, Hampshire, UK.
29. Yamaguchi, S., Yoshikawa, T., Ikeda, S. and Ninomiya, T. (1970) Studies on the taste of some sweet substances. Part II. Interrelationships among them. Agricult. Biol. Chem., 34, 187-197.