|
Volumn 78, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 294-299
|
Comparison of costs for infusion versus bolus chemotherapy administration: Analysis of five standard chemotherapy regimens in three common tumors - Part one: Model projections for cost based on charges
a a a |
Author keywords
breast cancer; chemotherapy charge profile; colon cancer; cost analysis; lymphoma
|
Indexed keywords
CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE;
DAUNORUBICIN;
ETOPOSIDE;
FLUOROURACIL;
FOLINIC ACID;
METHOTREXATE;
PREDNISONE;
VINCRISTINE SULFATE;
ARTICLE;
BOLUS INJECTION;
BREAST CANCER;
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY;
CANCER SURVIVAL;
COLON CANCER;
CONTINUOUS INFUSION;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM;
HUMAN;
INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION;
LYMPHOMA;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
ANTIBIOTICS, ANTINEOPLASTIC;
ANTIDOTES;
ANTIMETABOLITES, ANTINEOPLASTIC;
ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS, ALKYLATING;
ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS, PHYTOGENIC;
ANTINEOPLASTIC COMBINED CHEMOTHERAPY PROTOCOLS;
BREAST NEOPLASMS;
COLONIC NEOPLASMS;
COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS;
CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE;
DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT;
DOXORUBICIN;
DRUG COSTS;
ETOPOSIDE;
FEES, MEDICAL;
FEES, PHARMACEUTICAL;
FEMALE;
FLUOROURACIL;
HUMANS;
INFUSIONS, INTRAVENOUS;
INJECTIONS, INTRAVENOUS;
LEUCOVORIN;
LYMPHOMA, NON-HODGKIN;
METHOTREXATE;
MODELS, ECONOMIC;
PREDNISONE;
SURVIVAL RATE;
VINCRISTINE;
|
EID: 0030056443
PISSN: 0008543X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960715)78:2<294::AID-CNCR16>3.0.CO;2-R Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (30)
|
References (9)
|