Mechanistic studies of palladium thin film growth from palladium(II) β-diketonates. 1. Spectroscopic studies of the reactions of bis(hexafluoroacetylacetonato)palladium(II) on copper surfaces

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 118, Issue 25, 1996, Pages 5977-5987

  Lin, Wenbin ^a   Wiegand, Benjamin C ^a   Nuzzo, Ralph G ^a   Girolami, Gregory S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COPPER; PALLADIUM COMPLEX;

ARTICLE; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METAL BINDING; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY;

EID: 0030056176     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja944130h     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Green, M. L.; Levy, R. A. J. Met. 1985, 37, 63-71.
2. Jensen, K. F.; Kern, W. In Thin Film Processes; Vossen, J. L., Kern, W., Eds.: Academic: Boston, 1991; Vol. II, Chapter III-1.
3. Gladfelter, W. L. Chem. Mater. 1993, 5, 1372-1388.
4. Jensen, K. F. In Microelectronic Processing: Chemical Engineering Aspects; Hess, D. W., Jensen, K. F., Eds.; Advances in Chemistry 221; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1989; Chapter 5.
5. Panousis, P. T.; Favreau, D. P.; Merchant, S. M.; Ryan, V.; Dein, E. A. In Proc. Adv. Metal. ULSI Appl.; Rana, V. V. S., Joshi, R. V., Ohdomari, I., Eds.; Materials Research Society: Pittsburgh, 1992; pp 3-12.
6. Joshi, R. V.; Basavaiah, S.; Hsu, L.; Jaso, M. In Proc. Adv. Metal. ULSI Appl.; Rana, V. V. S., Joshi, R. V., Ohdomari, I., Eds.; Materials Research Society: Pittsburgh, 1992; pp 35-48.
7. Van Hemert, R. L.; Spendlove, L. B.; Sievers, R. E. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1965, 112, 1123-1126.
8. Temple, D.; Reisman, A. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1989, 136, 3525-3529.
9. Jeffries, P. M.; Dubois, L. H.; Girolami. G. S. Chem. Mater. 1992, 4, 1169-1175.
10. Chi, K.-M.; Garvey, J. W.; Shin, H. K.; Hampden-Smith, M. J.; Kodas, T. T.; Farr, J. D.; Paffett, M. F. J. Mater. Res. 1991, 7, 261-264.
11. Shin, H. K.; Chi, K. M.; Hampden-Smith, M. J.; Kodas, T. T.; Farr, J. D.; Paffett, M. Chem. Mater. 1992, 4, 788-795.
12. Norman, J. A. T.; Muratore, B. A.; Dyer, P. N.; Roberts, D. A.; Hochberg, A. K. J. Phys. IV, 1991, 1, C2/271-C2/278.
13. Kumar, R.; Fronzek, F. R.; Maverick, A. W.; Lai, W. G.; Griffin, G. L. Chem. Mater. 1992, 4, 577-582.
14. Reynolds, S. K.; Smart, C. J.; Baran, E. F.; Baum, T. H.; Larson, C. E.; Brock, P. J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1991, 59, 2332-2334.
15. Ho, P. S.; d'Heurle, F. M.; Gangulee, A. In Electro- and Thermo-Transport in Metals and Alloys; Hummel, R. E., Huntington, H. B., Eds.; American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers: New York, 1977; pp 124-126.
16. McCaskie, J. E. Plt. Electron. Ind. Symp., 5th 1975, 5-27.
17. Lin, W.; Warren, T. H.; Nuzzo, R. G.; Girolami, G. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 11644-11645.
18. Lin, W.; Warren, T. H.; Wilson, S. R.; Girolami, G. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. Submitted for publication.
19. Lin, W.; Nuzzo, R. G.; Girolami, G. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 5988-5996.
20. Dubois, L. H. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1989, 60, 410-413.
21. See, for example: Nuzzo, R. G.; Zegarski, B. R.; Korenic, E. M,; Dubois, L. H. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 1355-1361.
22. Bent, B. E.; Nuzzo, R. G.; Dubois, L. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 1634-1644.
23. Siedle, A. R. Inorg. Synth. 1990, 27, 316-317.
24. Moulder, J. F.; Stickle, W. F.; Sobol, P. E.; Bomben, K. D. Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy: Perkin Elmer: Eden Prairie, MN, 1992; pp 118-119.
25. Siedle, A. R.; Newmark, R. A.; Kruger, A. A.; Pignolet, L. H. Inorg. Chem. 1981, 20, 3399-3404.
26. Cohen, S. L.; Liehr, M.; Kasi, S. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1992, 60, 50-52.
27. Girolami, G. S.; Jeffries, P. M.; Dubois, L. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 1015-1024.
28. Nakamoto, K.; Morimoto, Y.; Martell, A. E. J. Phys. Chem. 1962, 66, 346-348.
29. Morris, M. L.; Moshier, R. W.; Sievers, R. E. Inorg. Chem. 1963, 2, 411-412.
30. 3] and 106 (Pd).
31. Globe, A. L.; Morris, M. C.; Koob, R. D. Org. Magn. Spectrom. 1971, 5, 633-649.
32. 27
33. 5/2 peak remains essentially unchanged, the peak at 533.3 eV completely disappears.
34. 2 is due to the hfac ligands orientated parallel to the surface. Lin, W.; Wiegand, B. C.; Girolami, G. S.; Nuzzo, R. G. Manuscript in preparation.
35. Parmeter, J. E. Unpublished observations.
36. Wagner, C. D.; Riggs, W. M.; Davies, L. E.; Moulder, J. F.; Mullenberg, G. E. Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy; Perkin Elmer: Eden Prairie, MN, 1978: p 5.
37. Kaesz, H. D.; King, R. B.; Stone, F. G. A. Z. Naturforsch. 1960, B15, 763-764.
38. Hieber, V. W.; Beck, W.; Lindner, E. Z. Naturforsch. 1961, B16, 229-231.
39. Hieber, W.; Muschi, J.; Duchatsch, H. Chem. Ber. 1965, 98, 3924-2930.
40. Redhead, P. A. Vacuum 1962, 12, 203-211.
41. The Auger electron spectrum of the pretreated surface did not show any signal for fluorine, probably because of electron-induced desorption of fluorine during the AES experiment. See, for example: Westphal, D.; Goldman, A. Surf. Sci. 1983, 131, 92-113.
42. Frost, D. C.; Ishitani, A.; McDowell, C. A. Mol. Phys. 1972, 24, 861-877.
43. The satellite peak with the highest binding energy is due to a simultaneous 3d to 4p transition occurring during the photoionization process; the satellite peak with the smaller energy shift can be explained by a simultaneous 3d to ligand transition. Cotton, F. A.; Harris, C. B.; Wise, J. J. Inorg. Chem. 1967, 6, 909-915.
44. Donnelly, V. M.; Gross, M. E. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 1993, A11, 66-77.
45. Welton, T.; Prasad, J.; Kelber, J. A.; Lujan, R. D.; Fleming, J.; Blewer, R. S. In Proc. Adv. Metal. ULSI Appl.; Rana, V. V. S., Joshi, R. V., Ohdomari, I., Eds.; Materials Research Society: Pittsburgh, 1992; pp 383-388.
46. 2 desorbs from carbonaceous copper surfaces.
47. See for example: Bent, B. E.; Nuzzo, R. G.; Dubois, L. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 1634-1644 and references therein.
48. There is little doubt that surface structures present on the polycrystal must be more diverse and complex than those found on a high-quality Cu-(111) single crystal. It is for this reason that the simple pattern of coincident peaks seen in Figure 8 is so perplexing. Such behavior could be rationalized if other features, such as diffusion to or trapping at strong bonding sites, dominated the adsorbate decomposition kinetics. This type of dynamical effect must be important at some level in the decomposition processes but to what extent it is expressed in the observed kinetics is unclear. We can offer little more here than to point out that "intuitive notions" of rate-structure sensitivities in heterogeneous reaction kinetics can be very misleading. An excellent discussion of the influence of surface heterogeneity in adsorption/desorption kinetics can be found in: Serri, J. A.; Tully, J. C.; Cardillo, M. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 79, 1530-1536.
49. For a recent review of the atomic-scale mechanisms that operate in metal-on-metal film structures, see: Chang, S.-L.; Thiel, P. A. Crit. Rev. Surf. Chem. 1994, 3, 239-296.
50. Gupta, M.; Kreuzer, H. J.; Weimer, J. J., Eds. Diffusion and Interfaces: Microscopic Concepts; Springer-Verlag: New York, 1988.
51. II species on the surface as judged by XPS studies.
52. Vanýsek, P. In Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 68th ed.; Weast, R. C., Astle, M. J., Beyer, W. H., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1988; pp D152-D154.
53. Collman, J. P.; Hegedus, L. S.; Norton, J. R.; Finke, R. G. Principles and Applications of Organotransition Metal Chemistry; University Science Books: Mill Valley, CA, 1987; p 826.
54. II acetate by an initially generated palladium particle. However, this is not the only possibility. See: Bradley, J. S.; Hill, E. W.; Klein, C.; Chaudret, B.; Duteil, A. Chem. Mater. 1993, 5, 254-256.