Bacterial contamination rates following processing of bone marrow and peripheral blood progenitor cell preparations

Transfusion

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 53-56

  Padley, D ^a,b   Koontz, F ^a,c,d   Trigg, M E ^a,c,d   Gingrich, R ^a,c,d   Strauss, R G ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

^c Department of Pathology ^*

^d UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^e Depts of Pathology and Pediatrics

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BACTERIUM CONTAMINATION; BONE MARROW CULTURE; BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION; CELL CULTURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; GRAM NEGATIVE BACTERIUM; GRAM POSITIVE BACTERIUM; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; SEPSIS;

EID: 0030051283     PISSN: 00411132     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1996.36196190515.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Klein HG, ed. Standards for blood banks and transfusion services. 16th ed. Bethesda: American Association of Blood Banks, 1994.
2. Thomas ED, Storb R. Technique for human marrow grafting. Blood 1970;36:507-15.
3. Trigg ME, Peterson A, Erickson C, et al. Depletion of T cells from bone marrow for allogeneic transplantation: method for treatment of bone marrow in bulk. Exp Hematol 1986;14:21-6.
4. Ball ED, Mills LE, Cornwell GG 3d, et al. Autologous bone marrow transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia using monoclonal antibody-purged bone marrow. Blood 1990;75:1199-206.
5. Howell AL, Fogg-Leach M, Davis BH, Ball ED. Continuous infusion of complement by an automated cell processor enhances cytotoxicity of monoclonal antibody sensitized leukemia cells. Bone Marrow Transplant 1989,4:317-22.
6. Rowley SD, Davis JM. Treatment of buffy coat cells with 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide. In: Areman A, Deeg HJ, Sacher RA, eds. Bone marrow and stem cell processing: a manual of current techniques. Philadelphia: FA Davis Company, 1992:236-9.
7. Schwella N, Zimmermann R, Heuft HG, et al. Microbiologic contamination of peripheral blood stem cell autografts. Vox Sang 1994;67:32-5.
8. Barrett BB, Andersen JW, Anderson KC. Strategies for the avoidance of bacterial contamination of blood components. Transfusion 1993;33:228-33.
9. Pfaller MA, Hollis RJ, Helio SS. Chromosomal restriction fragment analysis by pulsed field gel electrophoresis. In: Isenberg HD, ed. Clinical microbiology procedures handbook, vol 2. Washington: American Society for Microbiology. 1992: Section 10.5.c.
10. Lazarus HM, Magalhaes-Silverman M, Fox RM, Creger RJ, Jacobs M. Contamination during in vitro processing of bone marrow for transplantation: clinical significance. Bone Marrow Transplant 1991;7:241-6.
11. Goldman M, Blajchman M. Blood product-associated bacterial sepsis. Transfus Med Rev 1991;5:73-83.
12. Rowley SD, Davis J, Dick J, et al. Bacterial contamination of bone marrow grafts intended for autologous and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Incidence and clinical significance. Transfusion 1988;28:109-12.
13. Ahmed T, Wuest D, Ciavarella D, et al. Marrow storage techniques: a clinical comparison of refrigeration versus cryopreservation. Acta Haematol 1991:85:173-8.
14. Stroncek DF, Fautsch SK, Lasky LC, Hurd DD, Ramsay NKC, McCullough J. Adverse reactions in patients transfused with cryopreserved marrow. Transfusion 1991;31:521-6.