Roche Image Analysis Systems, Inc.

Acta Cytologica

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 60-66

  Knesel, Ernest A ^a  

^a ELON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cervical smears; Computer Assisted; Image analysis; Laboratory diagnosis; Mass screening

Indexed keywords

PRESERVATIVE; REAGENT;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY;

EID: 0030050731     PISSN: 00015547     EISSN: 19382650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000333586     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Atkinson LA, Fischer JE: Cell database design ensures acuity of automated cervical cancer screening. Acta Cytol 1994;38:803
2. Azlin T, Smith S, Lambird PA: A comparison study of gynecologic specimens using the Roche CytoRich monolayer Papanicolaou smear and the conventional Papanicolaou smear method. Acta Cytol 1994;38:805
3. Doerrer RH, Atkinson LA, Fischer JE, Nguyen TV: RIAS automated cytology system: CytoRich and AUTOcyte. Acta Cytol 1994;39:630
4. Doerrer RH, Atkinson LA, Fischer JE, Nguyen TV: Automated Papanicolaou smear screening with AUTOcyte. Acta Cytol 1995;39:288
5. Doerrer RH, Gahm T: The automated cytopathology laboratory. Acta Cytol 1994;38:629
6. Fischer JE, Doerrer R, Nguyen TV: Automated screening of gynecologic specimens with AUTOcyte. Acta Cytol 1994;38: 803
7. Geyer JW, Hancock F, Carrico C, Kirkpatrick M: Comparison of monolayers prepared with the CytoRich cytology preparation system to matched conventional smears. Acta Cytol 1992;36:586
8. Geyer JW, Hancock F, Carrico C, Kirkpatrick M: Preliminary evaluation of CytoRich: An improved automated cytology presentation. Diagn Cytopathol 1993;7:417-422
9. Geyer JW, Heinzerling R, Kirkpatrick M, Sprenger E: An analysis of the false-negative rates in the various diagnostic categories for matched CytoRich cervical and conventional Papanicolaou smear preparations. Acta Cytol 1994;38:806
10. Grohs HK, Zahniser DJ, Geyer JW: Standardization of specimen preparation through mono/thin-layer technology in automated cervical cancer screening. In The Automation of Cervical Cancer Screening. Edited by HK Grohs, OAN Husain. New York, Igaku-Shoin, 1994, pp 176-185
11. Heinzerling R, Phillips C, Ruotolo N, Geyer J: Optimization of Papanicolaou stain for automated cervical cytology. Acta Cytol 1995;39:301
12. Hutchinson M, Isenstein L, Goodman A, Hurley A, Douglass K, Mui K, Patten F, Zahniser D: Homogeneous sampling accounts for increased diagnostic accuracy using the ThinPrep Processor. Am J Clin Pathol 1994;101:215-219
13. Kaifel AK, Fischer JE: Neural network algorithms for image processing and cell classification within microscopic images. Acta Cytol 1994;38:803
14. Knesel EA, Geyer JW, Gahm T, Nguyen T, Fischer J, Doerrer R: The Roche cytology system: CytoRich and AUTOcyte. In The Automation of Cervical Cancer Screening. Edited by HK Grohs, OAN Husain. New York, Igaku-Shoin, 1994, pp 294-304
15. Learmonth G, Monson G, Ruotolo N, Geyer J: The efficiency of CytoRich for the preparation of cervical monolayers. Acta Cytol 1995;39:322
16. McGoogan E: Comparative evaluation of thin layer devices for cervical cytopathology. Acta Cytol 1995;39:330
17. Sprenger E, Schwarzmann P, Heinzerling R, Geyer J: A comparison of cervical monolayers to conventional smears. Acta Cytol 1995;39:359
18. Sprenger E, Schwarzmann P, Kirkpatrick M, Fox W, Heinzerling R, Geyer J, Knesel E: The false negative rate in cervical cytology: A comparison of monolayers to conventional smears. Acta Cytol (in press)
19. Vassilakos P, Cossali D, Albe X, Alonso L, Hohener R, Puget E: Cervical cytology: A comparison study between conventional cervical cytologic smears and monolayer preparations. Acta Cytol (in press)
20. Vassilakos P, Cossali D, Albe X, Alonso L, Hohener R, Puget E: Efficacy of monolayer preparation for cervical cytology: Emphasis on suboptimal specimens. Acta Cytol 1995;39: 358-368
21. Bhattacharya AK, Davis R, Halliday BE, Graham AR, Leavitt A, Martinez R, Rivas RA, Weinstein RS: Case image model for the practice of telepathology. J Telemed 1995;1:9-17
22. Oberholzer M, Fischer HR, Christen H, Gerber S, Brühlmann M, Mihatsch MJ, Gahm T, Famos M, Winkler C, Fehr P, Hosch HJ, Bächtold L: Telepathology: Frozen section diagnosis at a distance. Virchows Arch 1995;426:3-9
23. Böcking A: DNA measurements: When and why? In Compendium on the Computerized Cytology and Histology Laboratory. Edited by GL Wied, PH Bartels, DL Rosenthal, U Schenck. Chicago, Tutorials of Cytology, 1994, pp 170-188
24. Ellison DA, Maygarden SJ, Novotny DB: Quantitative DNA analysis of fresh solid tumors by flow and image cytometric methods: A comparison using the Roche Pathology Workstation image analyzer. Mod Pathol 1995;8:275-281
25. Knesel EA: Image analysis for cytology and pathology. Am Clin Lab 1994;13:28-31
26. Lee S, Tolmachoff T, Marchevsky AM: DNA content analysis ("ploidy") by image analysis: Clinical applications and comparison with flow cytometry. In Image Analysis: A Primer for Pathologists. New York, Raven Press, 1994, pp 261-307
27. Ross JS, Figge H, Bui HX, del Rosario AD, Jennings TA, Rifkin MD, Fisher HAG: Prediction of pathologic stage and postprostatectomy disease recurrence by DNA ploidy analysis of initial needle biopsy specimens of prostate cancer. Cancer 1994;74:2811-2818
28. Ross JS, Figge HL, Bui HX, del Rosario AD, Fisher HAG, Nazer T, Jennings TA, Ingle R, Kim DN: E-cadherin expression in prostatic carcinoma biopsies: Correlation with tumor grade, DNA content, pathologic stage, and clinical outcome. Mod Pathol 1994;7:835-841