Judges' cautionary instructions on eyewitness testimony

American Journal of Forensic Psychology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 31-65

  Ramirez, Gabriella ^a   Zemba, Dennis ^a   Edward Geiselman, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; REVIEW; WITNESS;

EID: 0030048265     PISSN: 07331290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Goldstein AG, Chance JE, Schneller GR: Frequency of eyewitness identification in criminal cases: a survey of prosecutors. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1989; 27:71-74
2. Rand Corporation: The Criminal Investigation Process, Vols. 1-3. Rand Corporation Technical Report R-1777-DOJ. Santa Monica, California, 1975
3. Sanders GS: On increasing the usefulness of eyewitness research. Law and Human Behavior 1986; 10:333-336
4. Visher CA: Juror decision making: the importance of evidence. Law and Human Behavior 1987; 11:1-17
5. Huff R, Rattner A, Sagarin E: Guilty until proven innocent. Crime and Delinquency 1986; 32:518-544
6. Wells GL: What do we know about eyewitness identification? American Psychologist 1993; 48:553-571
7. Fisher RP, Geiselman RE: Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing. Springfield, Ill, Charles Thomas Publishers, 1992
8. Yarmey AD: The Psychology of Eyewitness Testimony. New York, Free Press, 1979
9. Elliot R: Expert testimony about eyewitness identification: a critique. Law and Human Behavior 1993; 17:423-437
10. Konecni VJ, Ebbesen EB: Courtroom testimony by psychologists on eyewitness identification issues: Critical notes and reflections. Law and Human Behavior 1986; 10:117-126