Human immunodeficiency virus disease in California: Effects of the 1993 expanded case definition of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

Western Journal of Medicine

Volumn 164, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 122-129

  Singleton, James A ^a   Tabnak, Farzaneh ^b   Kuan, Jensen ^b   Rutherford, George W ^c  

^a Klemm Analysis Group   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CD4 ANTIGEN;

ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROME; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; EPIDEMIC; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; INCIDENCE; INFECTION RISK; LYMPHOCYTE COUNT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPPORTUNISTIC INFECTION; SEROCONVERSION; UNITED STATES;

ACQUIRED IMMUNODEFICIENCY SYNDROME; CALIFORNIA; HUMANS; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE;

EID: 0030047327     PISSN: 00930415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. California Department of Health Services (CDHS); Estimates of HIV prevalence and AIDS incidence - California. 1994 Calif HIV/AIDS update 1995; 8:1-5
2. CDHS: Recent trends in reported AIDS cases in California Calif HIV/AIDS Update 1993; 6.1-5
3. CDHS; The AIDS epidemic in California: An epidemiologic profile of the first 50,000 diagnosed and reported cases Calif HIV/AIDS Update 1993; 6 55-62
4. Singleton JA, Otten MW, Doebbert G, Kizer KW: Premature mortality related to HIV infection in California 1981-1993 J Acquir Immune Defic Syndi 1992; 5:688-693
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Revision of die CDC surveillance case definition for acquired immunodeficiency syvndrome. MMWR 1987. 36(suppl 1)
6. CDC. 1993 revised classification system for HIV infection and expanded surveillance ease definition for AIDS among adolescents and adults. MMWR 1992; 41(No, RR-17)
7. Buehler JW, Ward JW: A new definition for AIDS surveillance, Ann Intern Med 1993; 118:390-392
8. Selik RM, Buehler JW, Karon JM, Chamberland ME, Berkelrnan RL: Impact of the 1987 revision of the case definition of acquired immune deficiency syn7 drome in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 1990; 3:73-82
9. Payne SF, Rutherford GW, Lemp GF, Clevenger AC: Effect of the revised AIDS case definition on AIDS reporting in San Francisco: Evidence for increased reporting in intravenous drug users. AIDS 1990; 4:335-339
10. CDC: Projections of the number of persons diagnosed with AIDS and the number of immunosuppressed HIV-infected persons. United States, 1992-1994. MMWR 1992; 41(No. RR-18)
11. CDC: Impact of the expanded AIDS surveillance case definition on AIDS case reporting - United States, first quarter, 1993 MMWR 1993; 42:308-310
12. Rutherford GW: Why, When, How to Report Communicable Diseases. Medical Board of California Action Report 1992; 45-24-25
13. Tabnak F: Multivariate Analysis of Reporting Delay Distribution of AIDS Cases in California (PhD Dissertation). Davis, Calif. University of California, 1994
14. CDC: Update: Impact of the expanded AIDS surveillance case definition for adolescents and adults on case reporting - United States, 1993. MMWR 1994; 43.160-170
15. CDC HIV/AIDS Surveill Rep 1994; 5(No 4).5
16. CDC: HIV/AIDS Surveill Rep 1994; 6(No. 1):5
17. Collier AC: Early intervention in HIV infection: Where are we? AIDS Res Human Retroviruses 1994; 10:893-899
18. Rosenberg PS, Goedert JJ, Biggar RJ Effect of age at seroconversion on the natural AIDS incubation distribution - Muldcenter Hemophilia Cohort Study and Internationa1 Registry of Seroconverters AIDS 1994. 8:803-810
19. Sheppard HW, Ascher MS, Winkelstein W Jr, et al; Use of T lymphocyte subset analysis in the case definition for AIDS. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 1993; 6:285-286
20. California Community Planning Working Group: California HIV Prevention Plan. San Francisco, Calif, Harder & Kibbe Research, October 1994
21. Valdisseri RO, Parra W, Conrad G Principles of HIV Prevention Community Planning. Presented at the 122nd Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, October 1994, Abstract 1123
22. Chaisson RE, Stanton DL, Gallant JE, Rucker S, Bartlett JG, Moore RD: Impact of the 1993 revision of the AIDS case definition on the prevalence of AIDS in a clinical setting. AIDS 1993; 7:857-862
23. Des Jarlais DC, Wenston J, Friedman SR, et al: Implications of the revised surveillance definition: AIDS among New York City drug users. Am J Public Health 1992; 82:1531-1533
24. Alcabes P, Muñoz A, Vlahov D, Friedland GH: Incubation period of human immunodeficiency virus. Epidemiol Rev 1994; 15-303-318
25. Jones JL, Hanson DL, Chu SY, et al: Surveillance of AIDS-defining conditions in the United Slates. AIDS 1994; 8:1489-1492
26. Bacchetti P: The impact of lengthening AIDS reporting delays and uncertainly about underreporting on incidence trends and projections J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 1994; 7:860-865
27. CDHS. California HIV prevalence estimates and AIDS case projections. Calif HTV/AIDS Update 1992; 5:1-6
28. CDC. Update: Trends in AIDS diagnosis and reporting under the expanded surveillance definition for adolescents and adults - United States, 1993 MMWR 1994; 43.826-831
29. Projections of the AIDS Epidemic in San Francisco: 1994-1997, San Francisco Department of Public Health. February 15. 1994
30. The CDC's Case Definition of AIDS: Implications of the Proposed Revisions - Background Paper. Washington, DC, US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, OTA-BP-H-89, 1992
31. Chang SW, Katz MH, Hemandez SR, The new AIDS case definition - Implications for San Francisco. JAMA 1992; 267:973-975
32. Social Security Administration - Proposed rules. Federal Register 1991; 56:65702-65713
33. Pantaleo G, Menzo S, Vaccarezza M, et al: Studies in subjects with long-term nonprosressive human immunodeficiency virus infection. N Engl J Med 1995; 332.209-216