The effect of tympanic membrane perforation size on umbo velocity in the rat

Laryngoscope

Volumn 106, Issue 1 I, 1996, Pages 71-76

  Bigelow, Douglas C ^a,b   Swanson, Paul B ^a   Saunders, James C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b 5 Ravdin ORL ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EARDRUM; EARDRUM PERFORATION; HEARING LOSS; MIDDLE EAR; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SOUND PRESSURE;

ANIMALS; HEARING LOSS, CONDUCTIVE; INTERFEROMETRY; RATS; RATS, INBRED STRAINS; TYMPANIC MEMBRANE; TYMPANIC MEMBRANE PERFORATION;

EID: 0030046408     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00005537-199601000-00014     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Davidson BJ, Morris MD. The perforated tympanic membrane. Am Fam Physician. 1992;45:1777-1782.
2. Redleaf MI, McCabe, BF. Lightning injury of the tympanic membrane. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1993;102:867-869.
3. Anthony WP, Harrison, CW. Tympanic membrane perforation: Effect on audiograms. Arch Otolaryngol. 1972;95:506-510.
4. Austin DF. Sound conduction of the diseased ear. J Laryngol Otol. 1978;92:367-372.
5. von Békésy G. Experiments in Hearing. New York: McGraw Hill; 1960.
6. Bordley JE, Hardy M. Effect of lesions of the tympanic membrane on the hearing acuity: observations on experimental animals and on man. Arch Otolaryngol. 1954;26:649-657.
7. Kruger B, Tonndorf J. Middle ear transmission in cats with experimentally induced tympanic membrane perforations. J Acoust Soc Am. 1977;61:126-132.
8. McArdle FE, Tonndorf J. Perforations of the tympanic membrane and their effects upon middle ear transmission. Arch Klin exp Ohr Nasi Kelhk Heilk. 1968;192:145-152.
9. Payne MC, Githler, FJ. Effects of perforations of the tympanic membrane on cochlear potentials. Arch Otolaryngol. 1951;50: 666-674.
10. DiMaio FHP, Tonndorf J. The terminal zone of the external auditory meatus in a variety of mammals. Arch Otolaryngol. 1978;104: 570-573.
11. Guinan JJ, Peake WT. Middle ear characteristics of anesthetized cats. J Acoust Soc Am. 1967;41:1237-1261.
12. Cohen YE, Rubin DM, Saunders JC, Middle-ear development I: extra-stapedius response in the neonatal chick. Hear Res. 1992; 58:1-8.
13. Cohen YE, Doan DE, Rubin DM, et al. Middle-ear development V: development of umbo sensitivity in the gerbil. Am J Otol. 1993; 14:191-198.
14. Doan DE, Cohen YE, Saunders JC. Middle-ear development IV: umbo motion in neonatal mice. J Comp Physiol [B]. 1994;174: 103-110.
15. Cohen YE, Bacon CK, Saunders JC. Development III: morphometric changes in the conducting apparatus of the mongolian gerbil. Hear Res. 1992;62:187-193.
16. Zimmer, WM, Rosin DF, Saunders JC. Middle-ear development VI. structural development of the middle ear of the rat. Anat Rec. 1994;239:475-484.
17. Igic P, Doan DE, Saunders JC. Development of tympanic membrane velocity in the rat. Abs Assoc Res Otolaryngol 1994;17: 223.
18. Relkin EM, Saunders JC. Displacement of the malleus in neonatal golden hamsters. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 1980;90:6-15.
19. Møller AR. Experimental study of the acoustic impedance of the middle ear and its transmission properties. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 1965;60:129-149.
20. Onchi Y. Mechanism of the middle ear. J Acoust Soc Am. 1961;33:794-805.
21. Peak WT, Rosowski JJ, Lynch TJ III. Middle-ear transmission: acoustic vs. ossicular coupling in cat and human. Hear Res. 1992;57:245-268.
22. Shera CA, Zweig G. Middle-ear phenomenology: the view from the three windows. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992;92:1356-1370.
23. Baranek LL. Acoustics. New York: American Institute of Physics; 1985.