Antimicrobial liquid formulations: A blind taste comparison of three brands of penicillin VK and three brands of amoxicillin

Annals of Pharmacotherapy

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 130-132

  Chan, Debora Schotik ^a,b   Demers, Denise M ^c   Bass, James W ^c  

^a MCHKPY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC   (United States)

^c TRIPLER ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMOXICILLIN; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; PENICILLIN V POTASSIUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG FORMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; ODOR; ORAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TASTE PREFERENCE;

EID: 0030041216     PISSN: 10600280     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/106002809603000203     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Ruff ME, Schotik DA, Bass JW, Vincent JM. Antimicrobial drug suspensions: a blind comparison of taste of fourteen common pediatric drugs. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1991;10:30-3.
2. Demers DM, Chan DS, Bass JW. Antimicrobial drug suspensions: a blinded comparison of taste of twelve common pediatric drugs including cefixime, cefpodoxime, cefprozil and loracarbef. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1994;13:87-9.
3. Johnson K. The world atlas of wine: the classic guide to the wines and spirits of the world. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1977:45-6.
4. Peryam DR, Pilgrim FS. Hedonic scale method of measuring food preferences. Food Technol 1957;11:9-14.
5. Dean ML. Presentation order effects in product taste tests. J Psychol 1980;105:107-10.
6. Winer BJ. Statistical principles in experimental design. Heightstown, NJ: McGraw-Hill, 1962:261-308.
7. Boŕeus LO. Principles of pediatric pharmacology. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1982:176-91.