Biochemical systematics and evolution of the crayfish genus Orconectes (Decapoda: Cambaridae)

Journal of Crustacean Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 111-141

  Fetzner Jr , James W ^a,b  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ORCONECTES SPP.;

EID: 0030039307     PISSN: 02780372     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1548936     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Abersold, P. B., G. A. Winans, D. J. Teel, G. B. Milner, and F. M. Utter. 1987. Manual for starch gel electrophoresis: a method for the detection of genetic variation. - NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service, Technical Report 61: 1-19.
2. Archie, J. W., C. Simon, and A. Martin. 1988. Small sample size does decrease the stability of dendrograms calculated from allozyme-frequency data. - Evolution 43: 678-683.
3. Avise, J. C. 1975. Systematic value of electrophoretic data. - Systematic Zoology 23: 465-481.
4. Brown, K. 1980. Low genetic variability and high similarities in the crayfish genera Cambarus and Procambarus. - American Midland Naturalist 105: 225-232.
5. Busack, C. A. 1988. Electrophoretic variation in the red swamp (Procambarus clarkii) and white river crayfish (P. acutus) (Decapoda: Cambaridae). - Aquaculture 69: 211-226.
6. _. 1989. Biochemical systematics of the crayfishes of the genus Procambarus, subgenus Scapulicambarus (Decapoda: Cambaridae). - Journal of the North American Benthological Society 8: 180-186.
7. Buth, D. G. 1984. The application of electrophoretic data in systematic studies. - Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15: 501-522.
8. Clayton, J. W., and D. N. Tretiak. 1972. Amine-citrate buffers for pH control in starch gel electrophoresis. - Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 29: 1169-1172.
9. Crandall, K. 1993. Molecular systematics and evolutionary biology of the crayfish subgenus Procericambarus (Decapoda: Cambaridae). - Ph.D. dissertation, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri. Pp. 1-412.
10. Creaser, E. P. 1962. Notes on homologies and genetic relationships in the Cambarinae crayfishes. - Pp. 1-7. Privately printed.
11. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. - Evolution 39: 783-791.
12. _. 1993. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.5c. - Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Distributed by the author.
13. Fetzner, J. W., Jr. 1993. Biochemical systematics of the crayfish genus Orconectes: relationships among subgenera. - M.S. thesis, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, Carbondale, Illinois. Pp. 1-106.
14. Fitzpatrick, J. F. 1967. The propinquus group of the crawfish genus Orconectes (Decapoda: Astacidae). - Ohio Journal of Science 67: 129-172.
15. _. 1986. The pre-Pliocene Tennessee River and its bearing on crawfish distribution (Decapoda: Cambaridae). - Brimleyana 12: 123-146.
16. _. 1987. The subgenera of the crawfish genus Orconectes (Decapoda: Cambaridae). - Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 100: 44-74.
17. Hobbs, H. H., Jr. 1967. A new crayfish from Alabama caves with notes on the origin of the genera Orconectes and Cambarus (Decapoda: Astacidae). - Proceedings of the United States National Museum 123(3621): 1-17.
18. _. 1984. On the distribution of the crayfish genus Procambarus (Decapoda: Cambaridae). - Journal of Crustacean Biology 4: 12-24.
19. _. 1988. Crayfish distribution, adaptive radiation and evolution. - In: D. M. Holdich and R. S. Lowery, eds., Freshwater crayfish: biology, management and exploitation. Pp. 52-82. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon.
20. _. 1989. An illustrated checklist of the American crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidae, Cambaridae, and Parastacidae). - Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 480: 1-236.
21. _, and T. C. Barr, Jr. 1972. Origins and affinities of the troglobitic crayfishes of North America (Decapoda: Astacidae) II. Genus Orconectes. - Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 105: 1-84.
22. Ingold, J. L., L. A. Weigt, and S. I. Guttman. 1988. Relationship between genetic variation in selected invertebrates and type of freshwater habitat. - Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 16: 343-349.
23. IUBMBNC (International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Nomenclature Committee). 1992. Enzyme nomenclature 1992: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology on the Nomenclature and Classification of Enzymes. - Academic Press, San Diego, California. Pp. 1-862.
24. Malecha, S. R. 1983. Crustacean genetics and breeding: an overview. - Aquaculture 33: 395-413.
25. Murphy, R. W., J. W. Sites, Jr., D. G. Buth, and C. H. Haufler. 1990. Proteins I: isozyme electrophoresis. - In: D. M. Hillis and C. Moritz, eds., Molecular systematics. Pp. 45-126. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
26. Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. - Genetics 89: 583-590.
27. Nemeth, S. T., and M. L. Tracey. 1979. Allozyme variability and relatedness in six crayfish species. - Journal of Heredity 70: 37-43.
28. Ortmann, A. E. 1905. The mutual affinities of the species of the genus Cambarus, and their dispersal over t the United States. - Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 44: 91-136.
29. Page, L. M. 1985. The crayfishes and shrimps (Decapoda) of Illinois. - Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 33: 335-448.
30. Pflieger, W. L. 1987. An introduction to the crayfishes of Missouri. - Missouri Department of Conservation, reprinted from the Missouri Conservationist. Pp. 1-16.
31. Rhoades, R. 1962. The evolution of the crayfishes of the genus Orconectes section Limosus (Crustacea: Decapoda). - Ohio Journal of Science 62: 65-96.
32. Ridgway, G. S., S. W. Sherburne, and R. D. Lewis. 1970. Polymorphism in the esterases of Atlantic herring. - Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 99: 147-151.
33. Saitou, N., and M. Nei. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. - Molecular Biology and Evolution 4: 406-425.
34. Seeb, J. E., G. H. Kruse, L. W. Seeb, and R. G. Weck. 1990. Genetic structure of red king crab populations in Alaska facilitates enforcement of fishing regulations. - Proceedings of the international symposium on king and Tanner crabs. Alaska Sea Grant, Fairbanks, Alaska. Pp. 491-502.
35. Selander, R. K., M. H. Smith, S. Y. Yang, W. E. Johnson, and J. B. Gentry, 1971. Biochemical polymorphism and systematics in the genus Peromyscus. I. Variation in the old field mouse (Peromyscus polionotus). Studies in Genetics VI. - University of Texas Publication 7103: 49-90.
36. Shaklee, J. B., F. W. Allendorf, D. C. Morizot, and G. S. Whitt. 1990. Gene nomenclature for protein coding loci in fish. - Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 119: 2-15.
37. Shaw, C. R., and R. Prasad. 1970. Starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes: a compilation of recipes. - Biochemical Genetics 4: 297-320.
38. Swofford, D. L., and G. J. Olsen. 1990. Phylogeny reconstruction. - In: D. M. Hillis and C. Moritz, eds., Molecular systematics. Pp. 411-501. Sinauer Associates. Sunderland, Massachusetts.
39. _, and R. G. Selander. 1981. BIOSYS-1: a FORTRAN program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. - Journal of Heredity 72: 281-283.
40. Tracey, M. L., K. Nelson, D. Hedgecock, R. A. Shleser, and M. L. Pressick. 1975. Biochemical genetics of lobsters: genetic variation and the structure of American lobster (Homarus americanus) populations. - Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 32: 2091-2101.