Electrochemically controlled adhesion in atomic force spectroscopy

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 118, Issue 26, 1996, Pages 6303-6304

  Hudson, James E ^a   Abruña, Hèctor D ^a  

^a Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GOLD; POLYMER;

ADHESION; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; SURFACE PROPERTY;

EID: 0030038307     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja953876s     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. (a) Frisbie, C. D.; Rozsnyai, L. F.; Noy, A.; Wrighton, M. S.; Lieber, C. M. Science 1994, 265, 2071-2073.
2. (b) Noy, A.; Frisbie, C. D.; Rozsnyai, L. F.; Wrighton, M. S.; Lieber, C. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7943-7951.
3. (c) Green, J.-B. D.; McDermott, M. T.; Porter, M. D. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 10960-10965.
4. (a) Rabinovich, Y. I.; Yoon., R.-H. Langmuir 1994, 10, 1903-1909.
5. (b) Florin, E. L.; Moy, V. T.; Gaub, H. E. Science 1995, 264, 415-417.
6. (c) Lee, G. U.; Chrisey, L. A.; Colton, R. J. Science 1994, 266, 771-773.
7. -7 Torr).
8. Film thicknesses were estimated by integrating the charge under the cyclic voltammetric wave corresponding to the oxidation of the ferrocene centers of a PVF film deposited onto a planar electrode of known area for the same time and conditions as that of the tip and substrate.
9. (a) Roullier, L.; Waldner, E. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1985, 187, 97-107.
10. (b) Merz, A.; Bard, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 3222.
11. Peerce, P. J.; Bard, A. J. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1980, 112, 97-115.
12. Adhesion force calculations assume a force constant of 0.06 N/m, the published value for an unmodified, commercially available cantilever (Digital Instruments). The actual force constant of the modified tip is likely larger than the assumed value; therefore, emphasis is placed on the relative magnitudes of the adhesion forces.
13. (a) Ducker, W. A. Langmuir 1992, 8, 1831-1836.
14. (b) Hoh, J. H.; Cleveland, J. P.; Prater, C. B.; Revel, J.-P.; Hansma, P. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 4917-4918.
15. Willman, K. W.; Murray, R. W. Anal. Chem. 1983, 55, 1139-1142.
16. (a) Butt, H. J. Biophys. J. 1991, 60, 777-785.
17. (b) Butt, H. J. Biophys. J. 1991, 60, 1438-1444.
18. (c) Senden, T. J.; Drammond, C. J.; Kékicheff, P. Langmuir 1994, 10, 358-362.
19. (d)Lin, X.-Y.; Creuzet, F.; Arribart, H. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 7272-7276.
20. Abbott, N. L.; Gorman, C. B.; Whitesides. G. M. Langmuir 1995, 11, 16-18.
21. Carboxylate-terminated surfaces and methylene-terminated surfaces were prepared by immersing clean gold samples for 1 h in 5 mM solutions of 3-mercaptopropanoic acid and 1-hexanethiol in ethanol, respectively. Samples were thoroughly rinsed with ethanol and 0.05 M ethanolic KOH solution.