Sexual selection in relation to pest-management strategies

Annual Review of Entomology

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 211-229

  Boake, Christine R B ^a   Shelly, Todd E ^b   Kaneshiro, Kenneth Y ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

Male competition; Mate choice; Pheromone; SIT

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030038109     PISSN: 00664170     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.001235     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. Alcock J. 1994. Postinsemination associations between males and females in insects: the mate-guarding hypothesis. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 39:1-21
2. Arita LH, Kaneshiro KY. 1989. Sexual selection and lek behavior in the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). Pacific Sci. 43: 135-43
3. Aspi J, Hoikkala A. 1993. Laboratory and natural heritabilities of male courtship song characters in Drosophila montana and D. littoralis. Heredity 70: 400-6
4. Bakker TCM. 1993. Positive genetic correlation between female preference and preferred male ornament in sticklebacks. Nature 363:255-57
5. Bloem K, Bloem S, Rizzo N, Chambers D. 1993. Female medfly refractory period: effect of male reproductive status. In Fruit Flies: Biology and Management, ed. M Aluja, P Liedo, pp. 189-90. New York: Springer-Verlag
6. Boake CRB. 1989. Correlations between courtship success, aggressive success, and body size in a picture-winged fly, Drosophila silvestris. Ethology 80:318-29
7. Boake CRB. 1991. Convolution of senders and receivers of sexual signals: genetic coupling and genetic correlations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6:225-27
8. Boake CRB, ed. 1994. Quantitative Genetic Studies of Behavioral Evolution. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
9. Boake CRB, Capranica RR. 1982. Aggressive signal in the "courtship" chirp of a gregarious cricket. Science 21:580-82
10. Boggs CL. 1995. Male nuptial gifts: phenotypic consequences and evolutionary implications. In Insect Reproduction, ed. SR Leather, J Hardie, pp. 213-40. Boca Raton, FL: CRC
11. Bossert WH, Wilson EO. 1963. The analysis of olfactory communication among animals. J. Theor. Biol. 5:443-69
12. Bradbury JW, Andersson MB, ed. 1987. Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives. Chichester, UK: Wiley & Sons
13. Burk T. 1983. Behavioral ecology of mating in the Caribbean fruit fly, Anastrepha suspensa (Loew) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Fla. Entomol. 66:330-44
14. Burk T, Calkins CO. 1983. Medfly mating behavior and control strategies. Fla. Entomol. 66:3-16
15. Burk T, Webb JC. 1983. Effect of male size on calling propensity, song parameters, and mating success in Caribbean fruit flies, Anastrepha suspensa (Loew) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 76:678-82
16. Butlin RK, Ritchie MG. 1989. Genetic coupling in mate recognition systems: what is the evidence? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 37:237-46
17. Cade WH. 1979. The evolution of alternative male reproductive strategies in field crickets. In Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects, ed. M Blum, NA Blum, pp. 343-79. London: Academic
18. Calkins CO. 1989. Quality control. See Ref. 93a, pp. 153-65
19. Campanella PJ, Wolf LL. 1974. Temporal leks as a mating system in a temperate zone dragonfly (Odonata: Anisoptera). I. Plathemis lydia (Drury). Behaviour 51:49-87
20. Cardé RT. 1990. Principles of mating disruption. See Ref. 91a, pp. 47-71
21. Cardé RT, Minks AK. 1995. Control of moth pests by mating disruption: successes and constraints. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 40:559-85
22. Carpenter JE, Sparks AN, Cromroy HL. 1987. Corn earworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): influence of irradiation and mating history on the mating propensity of females. J. Econ. Entomol. 80:1233-37
23. Charlton RE, Cardé RT. 1990. Behavioral interactions in the courtship of Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 83:89-96
24. Chen PS, Stumm-Zollinger E, Aigaki T, Balmer J, Bienz M, Bohlen P. 1988. A male accessory gland peptide that regulates reproductive behavior of female D. melanogaster. Cell 54:291-98
25. Clark DL, Uetz GW. 1990. Video image recognition by the jumping spider, Maevia inclemens (Araneae: Salticidae). Anim. Behav. 40:884-90
26. Clutton-Brock TH, ed. 1988. Reproductive Success: Studies of Individual Variation in Contrasting Breeding Systems. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
27. Collins RD, Cardé RT. 1989. Selection for altered pheromone-component ratios in the pink bollworm moth, Pectinophora gossypiella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). J. Insect Behav. 2:609-21
28. Collins RD, Cardé RT. 1990. Selection for increased pheromone response in the male pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Behav. Genet. 20:325-31
29. Collins RD, Rosenblum SL, Cardé RT. 1990. Selection for increased pheromone titre in the pink bollworm moth, Pectinophora gossypiella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Physiol. Entomol. 15: 141-47
30. Colwell AE, Shorey HH. 1976. Courtship stimuli affecting female receptivity in the house fly, Musca domestica. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 69:80-84
31. Darwin C. 1871. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: Murray
32. Davies NB. 1991. Mating systems. In Behavioural Ecology, an Evolutionary Approach, ed. JR Krebs, NB Davies, pp. 263-94. Oxford: Blackwell
33. Dodson CH, Dressler RL, Hills HG, Adams RM, Williams NH. 1969. Biologically active compounds in orchid fragrances. Science 164:1243-49
34. Downes JA. 1969. The swarming and mating flight of Diptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 14:271-98
35. Dyer FC, Gould JL. 1983. Honey bee navigation. Am. Sci. 71:587-97
36. Eberhard WG. 1994. Evidence for widespread courtship during copulation in 131 species of insects and spiders, and implications for cryptic female choice. Evolution 48:711-33
37. Emlen ST, Oring LT. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215-23
38. Ewing A. 1989. Arthropod bioacoustics: Neurobiology and Behaviour. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
39. Fincke OM. 1988. Sources of variation in lifetime reproductive success in a nonterritorial damselfly (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). See Ref. 26, pp. 24-43
40. Forrest TG. 1982. Acoustic communication and baffling behaviors of crickets. Fla. Entomol. 65:33-44
41. Fye RL, LaBrecque GC. 1966. Sexual acceptability of laboratory strains of male house flies in competition with wild strains. J. Econ. Entomol. 59:538-40
42. Gage MJG. 1992. Removal of rival sperm during copulation in a beetle, Tenebrio molitor. Anim. Behav. 44:587-89
43. Gerhardt HC. 1991. Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Anim. Behav. 42:615-35
44. Grant GG. 1981. Mating behavior of the whitemarked tussock moth and role of female scales in releasing male copulatory attempts. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 74:100-5
45. Gregory PG, Howard DJ. 1994. A postinsemination barrier to fertilization isolates two closely related ground crickets. Evolution 48:705-10
46. Gromko MH, Gilbert DG, Richmond RC. 1984. Sperm transfer and use in the multiple mating system of Drosophila. See Ref. 103, pp. 371-426
47. Gwynne DT. 1981. Sexual difference theory: Mormon crickets show role reversal in mate choice. Science 213:779-80
48. Gwynne DT. 1984. Male mating effort, confidence of paternity, and insect sperm competition. See Ref. 103, pp. 117-49
49. Gwynne DT. 1985. Role-reversal in katydids: habitat influences reproductive behaviour (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae, Metaballus sp.). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 16:355-61
50. Gwynne DT, Simmons LW. 1990. Experimental reversal of courtship roles in an insect. Nature 346:172-74
51. Hedrick AV. 1986. Female preferences for male calling bout duration in a field cricket. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19:73-77
52. Hedrick AV, Dill LM. 1993. Mate choice by female crickets is influenced by predation risk. Anim. Behav. 46:139-96
53. Hewitt GM, Mason P, Nichols RA. 1989. Sperm precedence and homogamy across a hybrid zone in the alpine grass-hopper Podisma pedestris. Heredity 62: 343-53
54. Hibino Y, Iwahashi O. 1991. Appearance of wild females unreceptive to sterilized males on Okinawa Is. in the eradication program of the melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett (Diptera: Tephritidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 26: 265-70
55. Hoffmann AA. 1988. Heritable variation for territorial success in two Drosophila melanogaster populations. Anim. Behav. 36:1180-89
56. Hoikkala A, Aspi J. 1993. Criteria of female mate choice in Drosophila littoralis, D. montana, and D. ezoana. Evolution 47:768-77
57. Hoikkala A, Kaneshiro K. 1993. Change in the signal-response sequence responsible for asymmetric isolation between Drosophila planitibia and Drosophila silvestris. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 90:5813-17
58. Hopper KR, Roush RT, Powell W. 1993. Management of genetics of biological-control introductions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 38:27-51
59. Horng S-B, Plant RE. 1992. Impact of lek mating on the sterile insect technique: a modeling study. Res. Popul. Ecol. 34:57-76
60. Iwahashi O, Itô Y, Shiyomi M. 1983. A field evaluation of the sexual competitiveness of sterilized melon flies, Dacus (Zeugodacus) cucurbitae. Ecol. Entomol. 8:43-48
61. Kim KC, McPheron BA, eds. 1993. Evolution of Insect Pests: Patterns of Variation. New York: Wiley & Sons
62. Kirkpatrick M. 1987. Sexual selection by female choice in polygynous animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:43-70
63. Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ. 1991. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33-38
64. Knipling EF. 1955. Possibilities of insect control or eradication through the use of sexually sterile males. J Econ. Entomol. 48:459-62
65. Kuba H, Itô Y. 1993. Remating inhibition in the melon fly, Bactrocera (= Dacus) cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae): copulation with spermless males inhibits female remating. J. Ethol. 11: 23-28
66. Kuba H, Koyama J. 1982. Mating behavior of the melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett (Diptera: Tephritidae): comparative studies of one wild and two laboratory strains. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 17:559-68
67. Kuba H, Koyama J, Prokopy RJ. 1984. Mating behavior of wild melon flies, Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett (Diptera: Tephritidae) in a field cage: distribution and behavior of flies. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 19:367-73
68. Lande R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:3721-25
69. Lande R. 1982. Rapid origin of sexual isolation and character divergence in a cline. Evolution 36:213-23
70. Lande R, Kirkpatrick M. 1988. Ecological speciation by sexual selection. J. Theor. Biol. 133:85-98
71. Landolt PJ, Heath RR. 1990. Sexual role reversal in mate-finding strategies of the cabbage looper moth. Science 249:1026-28
72. Lanier GN. 1990. Principles of attraction-annihilation: Mass trapping and other means. See Ref. 91a, pp. 25-45
73. Lew AC, Ball HJ. 1980. Effect of copulation time on spermatozoan transfer of Diabrotica virgifera (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 73:360-61
74. Lorch PD, Wilkinson GS, Riello PR. 1993. Copulation duration and sperm precendence in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis whitei (Diptera: Diopsidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32:303-11
75. Mangan RL. 1988. Pedigree and heritability influences on mate selectivity and mating aggressiveness in the screwworm, Cochliomyia hominivorax (Diptera: Cailiphoridae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 81:649-56
76. Markow T. 1995. Evolutionary ecology and developmental instability. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 40:105-20
77. Marier P. 1977. The evolution of communication. See Ref. 95a, pp. 45-70
78. McVey ME. 1988. The opportunity for sexual selection in a territorial dragonfly, Erythemis simplicicollis. See Ref. 26, pp. 44-58
79. Moore AJ. 1989. The behavioral ecology of Libellula luctuosa (Burmeister) (Odonata: Libellulidae). III. Male density, OSR, and male and female mating behavior. Ethology 80:120-36
80. Moore AJ, Breed MD. 1986. Mate assessment in a cockroach, Nauphoeta cinerea. Anim. Behav. 34:1160-65
81. Murvosh CM, Fye RL, Labrecque GC. 1964. Studies on the mating behavior of the house fly, Musca domestica L. Ohio J. Sci. 64:264-71
82. Newport MEA, Gromko MH. 1984. The effect of experimental design on female receptivity to remating and its impact on reproductive success in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 38:1261-72
83. Nishida R, Tan KH, Serit M, Lajis NH, Sukari AM, et al. 1988. Accumulation of phenylpropanoids in the rectal glands of males of the oriental fruit fly, Dacus dorsalis. Experientia 44:534-36
84. Otte D. 1977. Communication in Orthoptera. See Ref. 95a, pp. 334-61
85. Parkman JP, Frank JH. 1993. Use of a sound trap to inoculate Steinernema scapterisci (Rhabditida: Sterinernematidae) into pest mole cricket populations (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae). Fla. Entomol. 76:75-81
86. Pliske TE, Eisner T. 1969. Sex pheromone of the queen butterfly: biology. Science 164:1170-72
87. Plomin R, DeFries JC, McClearn GE. 1980. Behavioral Genetics: A Primer. San Francisco: Freeman
88. Poramarcom R. 1988. Sexual communication in the Oriental fruit fly, Dacus dorsalis Hendel (Diptera: Tephritidae). PhD thesis. Univ. Hawaii, Honolulu
89. Poramarcom R, Boake CRB. 1991. Behavioural influences on male mating success in the Oriental fruit fly, Dacus dorsalis Hendel. Anim. Behav. 42:453-60
90. Prokopy RJ, Hendrichs J. 1979. Mating behavior of Ceratitis capitata on a fieldcaged tree. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 72: 642-48
91. Raina AK, Stadelbacher EA. 1990. Pheromone titer and calling in Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): effect of mating with normal and sterile backcross males. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 83:987-90
92. 91a. Ridgway RL, Silverstein RM, Inscoe MN, eds. 1990. Behavior-Modifying Chemicals for Insect Management: Applications of Pheromones and Other Attractants. New York: Marcel Dekker
93. Ringo JM. 1996. Sexual receptivity in female insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 41: 473-94
94. Robacker DC, Mangan RL, Moreno DS, Tarshis Moreno AM. 1991. Mating behavior and male mating success in wild Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) on a field-caged host tree. J. Insect Behav. 4:471-87
95. Robinson AS, Hooper G, eds. 1989. Fruit Flies: Their Biology. Natural Enemies and Control. New York: Elsevier
96. Robinson T, Johnson NA, Wade MJ. 1994. Postcopulatory, prezygotic isolation: intraspecific and interspecific sperm precedence in Tribolium spp., flour beetles. Heredity 73:155-59
97. Roelofs W, Du J-W, Linn C, Glover TJ, Bjostad LB. 1986. The potential for genetic manipulation of the redbanded leafroller moth sex pheromone blend. In Evolutionary Genetics of Invertebrate Behavior, ed. MD Huettel, pp. 263-72. New York: Pleum
98. Roush RT, McKenzie JA. 1987. Ecological genetics of insecticide and acaricide resistance. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 32:361-80
99. Sebeok TA, ed 1977. How Animals Communicate. Bloomington, IN: Indiana Univ. Press
100. Shelly TE, Dewire A-LM. 1994. Chemically mediated mating success in male Oriental fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87:375-82
101. Shelly TE, Kaneshiro KY. 1991. Lek behavior of the Oriental fruit fly, Dacus dorsalis, in Hawaii (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Insect Behav. 4:235-41
102. Shelly TE, Whittier TS. 1995. Lek behavior of insects. In Social Competition and Cooperation in Insects and Arachnids, Vol. 1, Evolution of Mating Systems, ed. JC Choe, BJ Crespi, Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. In press
103. Shelly TE, Whittier TS, Kaneshiro KY. 1994. Sterile insect release and the natural mating system of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87:470-81
104. Silberglied RE. 1977. Communication in the Lepidoptera. See Ref. 95a, pp. 362-402
105. Sivinski J. 1989. Lekking and the smallscale distribution of the sexes in the Caribbean fruit fly, Anastrepha suspensa (Loew). J. Insect Behav. 2:3-13
106. Sivinski J, Burk T. 1989. Reproductive and mating behaviour. See Ref. 93a, pp. 343-51
107. Smith RL, ed. 1984. Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems. New York: Academic
108. Soemori H, Tsukagushi S, Nakamori H. 1980. Comparison of mating ability and mating competitiveness between massreared and wild strains of the melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae coquillett (Diptera: Tephritidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 24: 246-50
109. Tabashnik BE. 1994. Evolution of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 39:47-79
110. Teale SA, Hager BJ, Webster FX. 1994. Pheromone-based assortative mating in a bark beetle. Anim. Behav. 48:569-78
111. Thornhill R, Alcock J. 1983. The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
112. Trivers RL. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971, ed. B Campbell, pp. 136-79. Chicago: Aldine
113. Waage JK. 1984. Sperm competition and the evolution of odonate mating systems. See Ref. 103, pp. 251-90
114. Wade MJ, Patterson H, Chang NW, Johnson NA. 1994. Postcopulatory, prezygotic isolation in flour beetles. Heredity 72:163-67
115. Walker TJ. 1993. Phonotaxis in female Ormia ochracea (Diptera: Tephritidae), a parasitoid of field crickets. J. Insect Behav. 6:389-410
116. Wall C. 1990. Principles of monitoring. See Ref. 91a, pp. 9-23
117. Watson PJ, Thornhill R. 1994. Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:21-25
118. Webb JC, Sivinski J, Smittle B. 1985. Acoustical courtship signals and sexual success in irradiated caribfly Anastrepha suspensa (Loew) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Fla. Entomol. 70:103-9
119. Webb KL, Roff DA. 1992. The quantitative genetics of sound production in Gryllus firmus. Anim. Behav. 44:823-32
120. Whittier TS, Kaneshiro KY, Prescott LD. 1992. Mating behavior of Mediterranean fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in a natural environment. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 85:214-18
121. Wilkinson GS, Reillo PR. 1994. Female choice response to artificial selection on an exaggerated male trait in a stalk-eyed fly. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 255:1-6
122. Wineriter SA, Walker TJ. 1990. Rearing phonotactic parasitoid flies (Diptera: Tacninidae: Ormia spp.). Entomophaga 35:621-32
123. Winston ML. 1987. The Biology of the Honey Bee. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
124. Yamagishi M, Tsubaki Y. 1990. Copulation duration and sperm transfer in the melon fly. Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett (Diptera: Tephritidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 25:517-19
125. Yuval B, Wekesa JW, Washino RK. 1993. Effect of body size on swarming behavior and mating success of male Anopheles freeborni (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Insect Behav. 6:333-42