Capture probabilities of lake superior zooplankton by an obligate planktivorous fish—the lake herring

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Volumn 125, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 139-142

  Link, Jason ^a  

^a MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLUPEA HARENGUS; COREGONUS ARTEDI;

EID: 0030037561     PISSN: 00028487     EISSN: 15488659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8659(1996)125<0139:CPOLSZ>2.3.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Baldwin, N. S., R. W. Saalfeld, M. A. Ross, and H. J. Buettner. 1979. Commercial fish production in the Great Lakes, 1867-1977. Great Lakes Fishery Commission Technical Report 3.
2. Brooks, J. L., and S. I. Dodson. 1965. Predation, body size, and composition of the plankton. Science 150:2
3. Dixon, P. M. 1993. The bootstrap and the jackknife: describing the precision of ecological indices. Pages 290-318 in S. M. Scheiner and J. Gurevitch, editors. Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman and Hall, New York.
4. Drenner, R. W., and S. R. McComas. 1980. The role of zooplankter escape ability and fish size selection in the selective feeding and impact of planktivorous fish. Pages 587-593 in Kerfoot (1980).
5. Drenner, R. W., J. R. Strickler, and W. J. O’brien. 1978. Capture probability: the role of zooplankter escape in the selective feeding of planktivorous fish. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 35: 1370-1373.
6. Gerking, S. D. 1994. Feeding ecology of fish. Academic Press, New York.
7. Havel, J. E., and S. I. Dodson. 1984. Chaoborous predation on typical and spined morphs of Daphnia pulex: behavioural observations. Limnology and Oceanography 29:487-494.
8. Havel, J.E., J. Link, and J. Niedzwiecki. 1993. Selective predation by Lestes (Odonata, Lestidae) on littoral microcrustacea. Freshwater Biology 29:47-58.
9. Holling, C. S. 1959. The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European pine sawfly. Canadian Entomologist 91:293-320.
10. Hrbacek, J. 1962. Species composition and the amount of zooplankton communities in relation to the fish stock. Rozpravy Ceskolovenske Akademie Ved Rada Matematickych a Prirodnich Ved 72:1-116.
11. Kerfoot, W. C. 1980. Evolution and ecology of zooplankton communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire.
12. Kettle, D., and W. J. O’brien. 1978. Vulnerability of arctic zooplankton species to predation by small lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush). Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 35:1495-1500.
13. Luecke, C., and W. J. O’brien. 1981. Prey location volume of a planktivorous fish: a new measure of prey vulnerability. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38:1264-1270.
14. O’brien, W. J. 1979. The predator-prey interaction of planktivorous fish and zooplankton. American Scientist 67:572-581.
15. O’brien, W. J. 1987. Planktivory by freshwater fish: thrust and parry in the pelagia. Pages 3-16 in W. C. Kerfoot and A. Sih, editors. Predation. Direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire.
16. Pastorok, R. A. 1980. Selection of prey by Chaoborous larvae: a review and new evidence of behavioral flexibility. Pages 538-554 in Kerfoot (1980).
17. Schmidt, D., and W. J. O’brien. 1982. Planktivorous feeding ecology of Arctic grayling (Thymallus arc-ticus). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 39:475-482.
18. Smith, S. H. 1970. Species interactions of the alewife in the Great Lakes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 99:754-765.
19. Vinyard, G. L. 1980. Differential prey vulnerability and predator selectivity: effects of evasive prey on blue-gill (Lepomis macrochirus) and pumpkinseed (Z. gibbosus) predation. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37:2294-2299.
20. Wells, L. 1970. Effects of alewife predation on zooplankton populations in Lake Michigan. Limnology and Oceanography 15:556-565.
21. Wright, D. I., and W. J. O’brien. 1982. Differential location of Chaoborous larvae and Daphnia by fish: the importance of motion and visible size. American Midland Naturalist 108:68-73.
22. Zar, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
23. Zaret, R. E. 1980. The animal and its viscous environment. Pages 3-9 in Kerfoot (1980).
24. Zaret, T. M. 1980. The effect of prey motion on plank-tivore choice. Pages 594-603 in Kerfoot (1980).