Benefit-cost analysis of the national pseudorabies virus eradication program

Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

Volumn 208, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 208-213

  Miller, Gay Y ^a,b   Tsai, Jyan Syung ^a   Forster, D Lynn ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PSEUDORABIES VACCINE;

ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; MORTALITY; NONHUMAN; PSEUDORABIES; SWINE; VACCINATION; VETERINARY MEDICINE;

ANIMALS; COMMUNICABLE DISEASE CONTROL; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DISEASE TRANSMISSION, HORIZONTAL; MODELS, ECONOMIC; PREVALENCE; PSEUDORABIES; RISK FACTORS; SWINE; SWINE DISEASES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0030034789     PISSN: 00031488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Gustafson DP, Scherba G. National survey of the economic impact of pseudorabies in swine Cooperative agreement No. 12-16-4-358 with USDA/APHIS. West Lafayette, Ind: Purdue University, 1978.
2. Thawley D, Beran G, Hogg A, et al. Summary report of pilot projects for eradication of pseudorabies in swine. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1987;191.1386-1390
3. Crowley VE, Moore HL, Domanico JL. Economic analysis of pseudorabies eradication in Pennsylvania. Pseudorabies epidemiology reports Madison, Wis Livestock Conservation Institute, 1986.
4. Friesen J, Bitney L, Azzam A An economic analysis of pseudorabies program alternatives for Nebraska - executive summary. Report to USDA/APHIS Lincoln, Neb: University of Nebraska, 1989.
5. Mueller AG. Economics of PRV eradication efforts in Illinois' a report on the Illnois PRV pilot project No. 86 E-340. Urbana, Ill: University of Illinois, Department of Agricultural Economics, 1986.
6. Hallam JA, Zimmerman JJ, Beran GW A benefit-cost analysis of the proposed national pseudorabies eradication program. Report to USDA/APHIS. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1987.
7. Ebel ED, Hornbaker RH, Nelson CH. Welfare effects of the national pseudorabies eradication program. Am J Agric Econ 1992; 74:638-645.
8. Pseudorabies eradication, state-federal-industry program standards. Washington, DC: USDA/APHIS, effective January 1, 1989.
9. Miller GY, Forster DL, Tsai J, et al. Predicting the number of herds infected with pseudorabies virus in the United States. AmJ Vet Res 1994;55:628-635.
10. Miller GY, Forster DL, Tsai J, et al. Productivity and profitability differences between pseudorabies infected and pseudorabies-noninfected farrow-to-finish swine herds. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1995;206:446-451.
11. Mishan EM. Cost-benefit analysis. London. Allen and Unwin Ltd, 1975.
12. Miller GY Evaluating the national impact of food animal diseases, in Proceedings. 5th Int Symp Vet Epidemiol Econ 1988; 360-362.
13. Miller GY, Rosenblatt JM, Hushak L. The effects of supply shifts on producer surplus. Am J Agric Econ 1988;70:886-891.
14. Agricultural prices. Washington, DC: NASS, USDA, 1988-1992.
15. Lemieux CM, Wohlgenant MK. Ex ante evaluation of the economic impact of agricultural biotechnology: the case of porcine somatotropic Am J Agric Econ 1989;71:903-914.
16. Dasgupta AK, Pearce DW. Cost-benefit analysis: the theory and practice. London: MacMillan Press Ltd, 1978.
17. Irwin SC, Forster DL, Sherrick BJ. Returns to farm real estate revisited. Am J Agric Econ 1988;70:580-587.
18. Willig RD. Consumer's surplus without apology. Am Econ Rev 1976;66:589-597.
19. Randall A, Stoll JR Consumer's surplus in commodity space. Am Econ Rev 1987;70:449-455.
20. Duffy SJ, Morrison RB, Thawley DG. Spread of pseudorabies virus among breeding swine in quarantined herds. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1991;199:61-65.
21. Zimmerman JJ, Hallam JA, Beran GW The cost of eliminating pseudorabies from swine herds in Iowa. Prev Vet Med 1989; 7:187-199.
22. Morrison RB, Wiseman BS, McKean JD. Multiple site production. Proc Annu Meet US Anim Health Assoc 1993,417-424
23. Sibbel R, Connor J, Nelson O, et al. Elimination of PRV from a large farrow to finish swine enterprise, in Proceedings. Am Assoc Swine Pract 1993;155-157.