Preliminary evaluation of an automated device for percutaneous liver biopsy

Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 325-326

  Root, Spencer ^a   DeAngelis, Sofia ^a   Sherman, Kenneth E ^b  

^a FITZSIMONS ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GALLBLADDER PERFORATION; HUMAN; LIVER BIOPSY; LIVER HEMORRHAGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ADULT; AGED; AUTOMATION; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIVER; LIVER DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 0030033319     PISSN: 01920790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004836-199606000-00020     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. McGill DB, Rakela J, Zinsmeister AR, et al. A 21-year experience with major hemorrhage after percutaneous liver biopsy. Gastroenterology 1990;99:1396-406.
2. Piccinino F, Sagnelli E, Pasquale G, et al. Complications following percutaneous liver biopsy; a multicenter, retrospective study on 68,276 biopsies. J Hepatology 1986;2:165-73.
3. Ishak KG, Schiff ER, Schiff L. Needle biopsy of the liver. In: Schiff L, Schiff ER, eds. Diseases of the liver. 6th ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1987:299-441.
4. Olynyk JK, O'Neill R, Britton RS, et al. Determination of hepatic iron concentration in fresh and paraffin-embedded tissue: diagnostic implications. Gastroenterology 1994;106:674-7.
5. Sherlock S, Dooley F. Diseases of the liver and biliary system. 9th ed. London: Blackwell, 1993:33-44.
6. Hopper KD, Abendroth CS, Sturtz KW, et al. Automated biopsy devices: a blinded evaluation. Radiology 1993;187:653-60.
7. Mladinich CRJ, Ackerman N, Berry CR, et al. Evaluation and comparison of automated biopsy devices. Work in progress. Radiology 1992;184:845-7.