Real-time dynamics in the interaction between a trial stimulus and its temporal context

Animal Learning and Behavior

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 92-104

  Palya, William L ^a   Chu, Josey Y M ^a  

^a JACKSONVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; NONHUMAN; PIGEON; PROBABILITY; REINFORCEMENT; RESPONSE TIME; STIMULUS;

ANIMALIA; COLUMBA;

EID: 0030027399     PISSN: 00904996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03198957     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. BOWER, G , MCLEAN., & MEACHAM, J. (1966). Value of knowing when reinforcement is due. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology; 62, 184-192
2. DINSMOOR, J. A., LEE, D. M., & BROWN, M M. (1986). Escape from serial stimuli leading to food. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 259-279.
3. ECKERMAN, D. A. (1973). Uncertainty reduction and conditioned reinforcement Psychological Record, 23, 39-48.
4. FANTINO, E. (1977). Conditioned reinforcement: Choice and information In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds), Handbook of operant behavior (pp 313-339). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5. FARMER, J., & SCHOENFELD, W. N. (1966). Varying temporal placement of an added stimulus in a fixed-interval schedule. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 9, 369-375.
6. GIBBON, J., & BALSAM, P. (1981) Spreading association in time. In C. M. Locurto, H. S. Terrace, & J. Gibbon (Eds), Autoshaping and conditioning theory (pp. 219-253). New York. Academic Press.
7. HEARST, E., & JENKINS, H. M. (1974) Sign-tracking The stimulusreinforcer relation and directed action. Austin, TX: Psychonomic Society.
8. MARR, M. J (1979). Second-order schedules and the generation of unitary response sequences. In M. D. Zeiler & P. Harzem (Eds.), Advances in analysis of behaviour: Vol. 1. Reinforcement and the organization of behavior (pp. 223-260). New York: Wiley.
9. MATTHEWS, T. J., & LERER, B. E. (1987). Behavior patterns in pigeons during autoshaping with an incremental conditioned stimulus. Animal Learning & Behavior, 15, 69-75.
10. MILLER, R. R., & MATZEL, L. D. (1989). Contingency and relative associative strength. In S. B. Klein & R. R. Mowrer (Eds.), Contemporary learning theories: Pavlovian conditioning and the status of traditional learning theory (pp. 61-84). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. PALYA, W. L. (1985) Sign-tracking with an interfood clock. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 321-330.
12. PALYA, W. L. (1993). Bipolar control in fixed interfood intervals. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 345-359.
13. RESCORLA, R. A., & WAGNER, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning: II. Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
14. WILLIAMS, D. A., FRAME, K. A., & LOLORDO, V. M. (1992). Discrete signals for the unconditioned stimulus fail to overshadow contextual or temporal conditioning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 41-55.
15. WILTON, R. N., & CLEMENTS, R. O. (1971). The role of information in the emission of observing responses: A test of two hypotheses. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 16, 161-166.
16. WYCKOFF, L. B., JR. (1952). The role of observing responses in discrimination learning: Part 1. Psychological Review, 59, 431-442.
17. ZEILER, M. D. (1977). Schedules of reinforcement: The controlling variables. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 201-232). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.