Scanning techniques in obstetrics and gynecology

Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 167-174

  Timor Tritsch, Ilan E ^a,b   Monteagudo, Ana ^a  

^a Department of Orthopaedic Surgery   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLADDER; CONFERENCE PAPER; ECHOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; PATIENT INFORMATION; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; TRANSVAGINAL ECHOGRAPHY; ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER;

FEMALE; GYNECOLOGY; HUMANS; OBSTETRICS; PELVIS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 0030026280     PISSN: 00099201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003081-199603000-00017     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Fleischer AC, Romero R, Manning FA, et al. The Principle and the Practice of Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 4th Ed. East Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange, 1991.
2. Timor-Tritsch IE, Rottem S, eds. Transvaginal Sonography. 2nd Ed. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1991.
3. Goldstein SR. Endovaginal Sonography. 2nd Ed. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1991.
4. Sabbagha RE. Diagnostic Ultrasound Applied to Obstetrics and Gynecology. 3rd Ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1994.
5. Chervenak FA, Isaacson GC, Campbell S. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Boston: Little, Brown, 1993.
6. Nyberg DA, Hill LM, Böhm-Velez M, Mendelson EB. Transvaginal Ultrasound. St. Louis: Mosby-Yearbook, 1992.
7. Timor-Tritsch IE, Rottem S, Thaler I. Review of TVS ultrasonography: a description with clinical application. Ultrasound Q. 1988;6:1-34.
8. Goldstein SR, Timor-Tritsch IE, eds. Ultrasound in Gynecology. New York: Churchill-Livingston, 1995.
9. Tessler FN, Schiller VL, Perrella RR, et al. TAS versus endovaginal pelvic sonography: prospective study. Radiology. 1980;170: 553-556.
10. Timor-Tritsch IE, Bar-Yam Y, Elgali S, Rottem S. The technique of TVS sonography with the use of 6.5 MHz probe. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;158:1019-1024.
11. Coleman BG, Arger PH, Grumbach K, et al. TVS and TAS sonography: prospective comparison. Radiology. 1988;168:639-643.
12. Mendelson EB, Böhm-Velez M, Joseph N, Neiman HL. Gynecologic imaging: comparison of TAS and TVS sonography. Radiology. 1988;166:321-324.
13. Lavery MJ, Benson CB. Transvaginal versus transabdominal ultrasound. In: Timor-Tritsch IE, Rottem S, eds. Transvaginal Sonography. 2nd Ed. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1991.
14. Odwin CS, Fleischer AC, Kepple DT. Probe covers and disinfectants for transvaginal transducers. J Diagn Med Sonogr. 1990;6: 130-135.
15. Kossoff G, Griffith KA, Dixon CE. Is the quality of transvaginal images superior to transabdominal one sunder matched conditions? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1991;1:29-35.
16. Bernaschek G, Deutinger J. Current status of vaginosonography - a world-wide inquiry. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1992;2: 352-356.
17. Timor-Tritsch IE. Standardization of ultrasonographic images: let's all talk the same language! Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1992;2:311-312.
18. Dodson MG, Deter RL. Definition of anatomical planes for use in transvaginal sonography. J Clin Ultrasound. 1990;18:239-242.
19. Zimmer EZ, Timor-Tritsch IE, Rottem S. The technique of transvaginal sonography. In: Timor-Tritsch IE, Rottem S, eds. Transvaginal Sonography. 2nd Ed. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1991.
20. Rottem S, Thaler I, Goldstein SR, Timor-Tritsch IE, Brandes JM. Transvaginal sonographic technique: targeted organ scanning without resorting to "planes". J Clin Ultrasound. 1990;18:243-247.