메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 52, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 143-156

Tobacco and the law: The state of the art

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIRPLANE CREW; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; CIGARETTE SMOKING; CONFLICT; FIRE; FOOTBALL; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; LAW SUIT; LEGAL LIABILITY; PASSIVE SMOKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAILWAY; REVIEW; TOBACCO; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0030026014     PISSN: 00071420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a011522     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (5)

References (42)
  • 1
    • 85035156774 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Foreign Office, 8 March 1824; from the Chief Clerk: 'I have been directed by Lord Palmerston to desire that a peremptory stop may from this time forward be put to all smoking in the office during office hours. Be so good as to convey this Order to the Heads of Departments and to desire that they will stop the practise of smoking in their several Departments; and that they will export any person who shall hereafterward contravene Lord Palmerston's order'
  • 2
    • 13344251257 scopus 로고
    • SI Regulation 8 (h)
    • Execution of Sentences of Death (Army) Regulations 1956 SI 1956 No.1970, Regulation 8 (h), Execution of Sentences of Death (Airforce) Regulations 1956 SI 1956 No. 2054, Regulation 8 (h), Execution of Sentences of Death (Navy) Regulations 1956 SI 1956 No. 62
    • (1956) Execution of Sentences of Death (Army) Regulations 1956 , Issue.1970
  • 3
    • 13344252526 scopus 로고
    • SI Regulation 8 (h)
    • Execution of Sentences of Death (Army) Regulations 1956 SI 1956 No.1970, Regulation 8 (h), Execution of Sentences of Death (Airforce) Regulations 1956 SI 1956 No. 2054, Regulation 8 (h), Execution of Sentences of Death (Navy) Regulations 1956 SI 1956 No. 62
    • (1956) Execution of Sentences of Death (Airforce) Regulations 1956 , Issue.2054
  • 4
    • 13344289956 scopus 로고
    • SI
    • Execution of Sentences of Death (Army) Regulations 1956 SI 1956 No.1970, Regulation 8 (h), Execution of Sentences of Death (Airforce) Regulations 1956 SI 1956 No. 2054, Regulation 8 (h), Execution of Sentences of Death (Navy) Regulations 1956 SI 1956 No. 62
    • (1956) Execution of Sentences of Death (Navy) Regulations 1956 , Issue.62
  • 6
    • 85035156037 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Mr George Foulkes, Labour MP for Cumnock and Doon Valley, sponsored a Private Member's Bill seeking to control smoking at work in the Health and Safety at Work (Tobacco Smoking) Bill, on 2 March 1992
  • 9
    • 84918692826 scopus 로고
    • R vs Secretary of State for Health ex parte Gallaher Ltd and others. ECJ, 28 June
    • R vs Secretary of State for Health ex parte Gallaher Ltd and others. ECJ, The Times 28 June 1993
    • (1993) The Times
  • 12
    • 84938247309 scopus 로고
    • Cummings vs Sir William Arrol
    • Cummings vs Sir William Arrol. Weekly Law Report 1962; 1: 295
    • (1962) Weekly Law Report , vol.1 , pp. 295
  • 13
    • 33748851749 scopus 로고
    • The 'neighbour' principle as expounded by Lord Atkin in Donoghue vs Stevenson
    • The 'neighbour' principle as expounded by Lord Atkin in Donoghue vs Stevenson. Appeal Cases 1932 562; Peabody Fund Governors vs Sir Lindsay Parkinson. Appeal Cases 1985; 240: 'in determining whether or not a duty of care of particular scope was incumbent upon a defendant it is material to take into consideration whether it is just and reasonable that it should be so'
    • (1932) Appeal Cases , pp. 562
  • 14
    • 13344290289 scopus 로고
    • Peabody Fund Governors vs Sir Lindsay Parkinson
    • The 'neighbour' principle as expounded by Lord Atkin in Donoghue vs Stevenson. Appeal Cases 1932 562; Peabody Fund Governors vs Sir Lindsay Parkinson. Appeal Cases 1985; 240: 'in determining whether or not a duty of care of particular scope was incumbent upon a defendant it is material to take into consideration whether it is just and reasonable that it should be so'
    • (1985) Appeal Cases , pp. 240
  • 15
    • 13344264195 scopus 로고
    • The Wagon Mound
    • The Wagon Mound. Appeal Cases 1967; 2: 617
    • (1967) Appeal Cases , vol.2 , pp. 617
  • 16
    • 13344289955 scopus 로고
    • Thompson vs Smiths Shiprepairers
    • Thompson vs Smiths Shiprepairers. Queens Bench 1984; 405: Wilsher vs Essex Area Health Authority. Weekly Law Report 1987; 2: 425
    • (1984) Queens Bench , pp. 405
  • 17
    • 13344254842 scopus 로고
    • Wilsher vs Essex Area Health Authority
    • Thompson vs Smiths Shiprepairers. Queens Bench 1984; 405: Wilsher vs Essex Area Health Authority. Weekly Law Report 1987; 2: 425
    • (1987) Weekly Law Report , vol.2 , pp. 425
  • 18
    • 0346198494 scopus 로고
    • 25 June
    • The Times 25 June 1992
    • (1992) The Times
  • 19
    • 13344253341 scopus 로고
    • Hotson vs East Berkshire Health Authority
    • Hotson vs East Berkshire Health Authority. Weekly Law Report 1987; 3: 232
    • (1987) Weekly Law Report , vol.3 , pp. 232
  • 20
    • 13344274777 scopus 로고
    • McGhee vs National Coal Board
    • McGhee vs National Coal Board. Weekly Law Report 1973; 1: 1
    • (1973) Weekly Law Report , vol.1 , pp. 1
  • 21
    • 85035158992 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Thompson's case (see above)
  • 22
    • 13344266049 scopus 로고
    • Budden vs BP and Shell
    • Budden vs BP and Shell. Solicitors Law J 1980; 124: 376
    • (1980) Solicitors Law J , vol.124 , pp. 376
  • 24
    • 13344291587 scopus 로고
    • Rookes vs Barnard
    • Rookes vs Barnard. Appeal Case 1964; 1029
    • (1964) Appeal Case , pp. 1029
  • 25
    • 0346198494 scopus 로고
    • 30 June
    • The Times 30 June 1992
    • (1992) The Times
  • 26
    • 0003913552 scopus 로고
    • 18 February
    • Financial Times 18 February 1995
    • (1995) Financial Times
  • 27
  • 28
    • 0004221833 scopus 로고
    • 14 December
    • Guardian 14 December 1994
    • (1994) Guardian
  • 29
    • 85035159331 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Sean Carroll vs Melbourne Transit Authority. Public statement made by Mr Bernard Murphy, Solicitor of Slater & Gordon, 11 August 1988
  • 30
    • 85035156288 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Veronica Bland vs Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council. Settled January 1993
  • 31
    • 6244249028 scopus 로고
    • 4 August
    • The Times 4 August 1994
    • (1994) The Times
  • 34
    • 85035157338 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sales of Goods Act 1979; s.14(2); s.14(6). Sale of Goods (Implied Terms) Act 1973, s.7(2)
    • Sales of Goods Act 1979 , Issue.2-6 , pp. 14
  • 36
    • 85035159376 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • Examples of such Regulations are: Highly Flammable Liquids and Liquefied Petroleum Gases Regulations 1972; Ionising Radiation Regulations 1985 and Gas Safety (Installation and Use) Regulations 1994
  • 40
    • 85035157835 scopus 로고
    • Environmental Health Officer working for Birmingham City Council
    • reported 23 March
    • Paul Hooper, Environmental Health Officer working for Birmingham City Council, reported in the Independent 23 March 1988
    • (1988) Independent
    • Hooper, P.1
  • 41
    • 13344287772 scopus 로고
    • Dryden vs Greater Glasgow Health Board
    • Dryden vs Greater Glasgow Health Board. Industrial Relations Law Reports 1992; 469
    • (1992) Industrial Relations Law Reports , pp. 469


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.