The impact of degenerative conditions in the spine on bone mineral density and fracture risk prediction

Osteoporosis International

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 43-49

  Von Der Recke, P ^a,b   Hansen, M A ^a   Overgaard, K ^b   Christiansen, C ^b  

^a GLOSTRUP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b CENTER FOR CLINICAL AND BASIC RESEARCH   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Bone densitometry; Degenerative conditions; Fracture risk; Osteophytosis; Osteoporosis

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTIOMETRY; AGED; ARTERY CALCIFICATION; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE MASS; BONE MINERAL; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; DENSITOMETRY; FEMALE; FOREARM; FRACTURE; HUMAN; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OSTEOPHYTE; POSTMENOPAUSE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK; SPONDYLOSIS; VERTEBRA FRACTURE; VERTEBRA MALFORMATION;

AGED; AORTIC DISEASES; BONE DENSITY; CALCINOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; POSTMENOPAUSE; RADIUS; RISK FACTORS; SPINAL DISEASES; SPINAL FRACTURES; ULNA;

EID: 0030023957     PISSN: 0937941X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF01626537     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Parfitt AM. Physiological and clinical significance of bone histomorphometric data. In: Recker RR, editor. Bone histomorphometry: techniques and interpretation. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1983:143-223.
2. Melton LJ III. Epidemiology of fractures. In: Riggs BL, Melton LJ III, editors. Osteoporosis: etiology, diagnosis and management. New York: Raven Press, 1988:133-54.
3. Wasnich RD, Davis JW, Ross PD. Spine fracture risk is predicted by non-spine fractures. Osteoporosis Int 1994;4:1-5.
4. Orwoll ES, Oviatt SK, Mann T. The impact of osteophytic and vascular calcifications on vertebral mineral density measurements in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1990;70:1202-7.
5. Drinka PJ, DeSmet AA, Bauwens SF, Rogot A. The effect of overlying calcification on lumbar bone densitometry. Calcif Tissue Int 1992;50:507-10.
6. Reid IR, Evans MC, Ames R, Wattie DJ. The influence of osteophytes and aortic calcification on spinal mineral density in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1991;72:1372-4.
7. Masud T, Langley S, Wiltshire P, Doyle DV, Spector TD. Effect of spinal osteophytosis on bone mineral density measurements in vertebral osteoporosis. BMJ 1993;307:172-3.
8. Dawson Hughes B, Dellal GB. Effect of radiographic abnormalities on rate of bone loss for the spine. Calcif Tissue Int 1990;46:280-1.
9. Lie JT. The structure of the normal vascular system and its reactive changes. In: Jüergens JL, Spittell JA Jr, Fairbairn JF, editors. Peripheral vascular diseases. Philadelphia: Saunders 1980:65.
10. Silver MD. Cardiovascular pathology. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1983:252.
11. Overgaard K, Hansen MA, Riis BJ, Christiansen C. Discriminatory ability of bone mass measurements (SPA and DEXA) for fractures in elderly postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 1992;50:30-5.
12. Kleerekoper M, Parfitt AM, Ellis BI. Measurement of vertebral fracture rates in Osteoporosis. In: Osteoporosis: proceedings of the International Symposium on Osteoporosis. Copenhagen, Denmark: Aalborg Stiftsbogtrykkeri, 1984:103-9.
13. Melton LJ III, Kan SH, Frye MA, Wahner HW, O'Fallon WM, Riggs BL. Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women. Am J Epidemiol 1989;129:1000-11.
14. Hansen MA, Hassager C, Overgaard K, Marslew U, Riis BJ, Christiansen C. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: a precise method of measuring bone mineral density in the lumbar spine. J Nucl Med 1990;31:1156-62.
15. Nilas L, Borg J, Gotfredsen A, Christiansen C. Comparison of single- and dual-photon absorptiometry in postmenopausal bone mineral loss. J Nucl Med 1985;26:1257-62.
16. Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 1978;8:283-98.
17. McNeil BJ, Keeler E, Adelstein SJ Primer on certain elements of medical decision making. N Engl J Med 1975;293:211-5.
18. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29-36.
19. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983;148:839-43.
20. Resnick D, Niwayama G. Degeneration disease of the spine. In: Resnick D, Niwayama G, editors. Diagnosis of bone and joint disorder. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1981:1374-80.
21. Pouilles JM, Tremollieres F, Louvet JP, Fournie B, Morlock G, Ribot C. Sensitivity of dual-photon absorptiometry in spinal osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 1988;43:329-34.
22. Cummings SR. Are patients with hip fracture more osteoporotic? Review of the evidence. Am J Med 1985;78:487-94.
23. Gotfredsen A. Pødenphant J, Nilas L. Christiansen C. Discriminatory ability of total body bone-mineral measured by dual photon absorptiometry. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1989;49:125-34.
24. Gevers G, Dequeker J. Geusens P, Nyssen-Behets C, Dhem A. Physical and histomorphological characteristics of iliac crest bone differ according to the grade of osteoarthritis at the hand. Bone 1989;10:173-7.
25. Roh YS, Dequeker J, Mulier JC. Cortical bone remodeling and bone mass in primary osteoarthritis of the hip. Invest Radiol 1973;8:251-4.
26. Wientroub S, Papo J, Ashkenazi M, Tardiman R, Weissman SL, Salama R. Osteoarthritis of the hip and fractures of the proximal femur. Acta Orthop Scand 1982;53:261-4.
27. Dequeker J. The relationship between osteoporosis and osteoarthritis. Clin Rheum Dis 1985;11:271-96.
28. Banks LM, Lees B, Macsweeney JE, Stevenson JC. Effect of degenerative spinal and aortic calcification on bone density measurements in post-menopausal women: links between osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease? Eur J Clin Invest 1994;24:813-7.
29. Bjarnason K, Hassager C, Ravn P, Christiansen C. Early postmenopausal diminution of forearm and spinal bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study. Osteoporosis Int 1995;5:35-8.