Advantages of using the midline incision right retroperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Surgery Today

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 1-4

  Endo, Masamitsu ^a   Kobayashi, Kouichirou ^a   Tsubota, Makoto ^a   Seki, Masahiro ^a   Sato, Hideo ^a   Noto, Tasuku ^a   Iwa, Takashi ^a  

^a ISHIKAWA PREFECTURAL CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

abdominal aortic aneurysm; midline incision; right retroperitoneal approach; wound complications

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ADULT; AGED; ANEURYSM SURGERY; AORTA CLAMPING; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HERNIA; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; ILEUS; PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; RETROPERITONEUM; SKIN INCISION; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERITONEUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROPERITONEAL SPACE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0030022028     PISSN: 09411291     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF00311983     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Collin J, Murie J, Morris PJ (1989) Two-year prospective analysis of the Oxford experience with surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Surg Gynecol Obstet 169:527-531
2. Mutirangura P, Stonebridge PA, Clason AE, McClure JH, Wildsmith JAW, Nolan B, Ruckley CV, Jenkis AMcL (1989) Ten-year review of non-ruptured aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg 76:1251-1254
3. Olsen PS, Schroeder T, Agerskov K, Roder O, Sorenson S, Perko M, Lorentzen JE (1991) Surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms: A survey of 656 patients. J Cardiovasc Surg 32:636-642
4. AbuRaham AF, Robinson PA, Boland JP, Lucente FC, Stuart SP, Neuman SS, Hall MD, Hoak BA (1991) Elective resection of 332 abdominal aortic aneurysms in a southern West Virginia community during a recent five-year period. Surgery 109:244-251
5. Rob C (1963) Extraperitoneal approach to the abdominal aorta. Surgery 53:87-89
6. Johnson JR, McLoughlin GA, Wake PN, Helsby CR (1986) Comparison of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal methods of aorto-iliac reconstruction. J Cardiovasc Surg 27:561-564
7. Chang BB, Paty PSK, Shah DM, Leather RP, Kaufman JL, McClellan WR (1989) The right retroperitoneal approach for abdominal aortic surgery. Am J Surg 158:156-158
8. Sicard GA, Allen BT, Munn JS, Anderson CB (1989) Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Surg Clin North Am 69:795-806
9. Leather RP, Shah DM, Kaufman JL, Fitzgerald KM, Chang BB, Feustel PJ (1989) Comparative analysis of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal aortic replacement for aneurysm. Surg Gynecol Obstet 168:387-393
10. Gregory RT, Wheeler JR, Snyder SO, Gayle RG, Love LP (1989) Retroperitoneal approach to aortic surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg 30:185-189
11. O Sullivan K, Bouchier D (1989) Respiratory function changes - Comparison between transabdominal and retroperitoneal approaches for abdominal aortic reconstruction. Can J Anaesth [Suppl] 71-72
12. Honig MP, Mason RA, Giron F (1992) Wound complications of retroperitoneal approach to the aorta and iliac vessels. J Vasc Surg 15:28-34
13. Shumacker HB (1972) Midline extraperitoneal exposure of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries. Surg Gynecol Obstet 135:791-792
14. Cambria RP, Brewste DC, Abbott WM, Freehan M, Megerman J, LaMuraglia G, Wilson R, Wilson D, Teplick R, Davison JK (1990) Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach for aortic reconstruction: A randomized prospective study. J Vasc Surg 11:314-325