Short communication: Use of the European image quality criteria for screen-film comparison - Application for asymmetric systems

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 69, Issue 817, 1996, Pages 64-69

  Guibelalde, E ^a   Morillo, A ^b   Fernandez, J M ^b   Vano E ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL CLÍNICO SAN CARLOS   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FILM; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; PHANTOM; RADIOLOGY; SIMULATION;

EID: 0030020054     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-69-817-64     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. COMMISSION OF EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Quality Criteria for Diagnostic Images. Working Document XII/173/90 (2nd edn) (EU, Brussels) (1990).
2. MORISHITA, J, McMAHON, H, DOI, K ET AL, Evaluation of an asymmetric screen-film system for chest radiography, Med. Phys., 21, 1769-1775 (1994).
3. BUSCH, H P, LEHMANN, K J, DRESCHER, P and GEORGI, M, New chest imaging techniques: a comparison of five analogue and digital methods, Eur. Radiol., 2, 335-341 (1992).
4. GRAY, J E, STEARS, J G, SWENSEN, S J and BUNCH, P C, Evaluation of resolution and sensitometric characteristics of an asymetric screen-film imaging systems, Radiology, 188, 537-539 (1993).
5. SWENSEN, S J, GRAY, J E, BROWN, L R ET AL, A new asymmetric screen-film combination for conventional chest radiography: evaluation in 50 patients, AJR, 160, 483-486 (1993).
6. CHOTAS, H G, FLOYD, C E JR and RAVIN, C E, Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems, AJR, 161, 743-747 (1993).
7. LOGAN, P M, TUNNEY, T, McCOY, C T and MASTERSON, J, Comparison of a new dual characteristic film-screen system (InSight) with a standard film-screen system for chest radiology. Br. J. Radiol., 67, 162-165 (1994).
8. NIKLASON, L T, CHAN, H P, CASCADE, P N ET AL, Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital system and conventional screen/film system, Radiology, 186, 387-393 (1993).
9. VAN METTER, R and DICKERSON, R, Objective performance characteristics of a new asymmetric screen-film system, Med. Phys., 21, 1483-1490 (1994).
10. DICKERSON, R, HAUS, A G and BAKER, C W, Method of simulated screen sensitometry for asymmetric, low crossover medical X-ray films, Med. Phys., 21, 525-528 (1994).
11. AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD INSTITUTE, Method for the Sensitometry of Medical X-ray Screen-film Processing Systems, ANSI PH2.43.1982 (ANSI, New York) (1982).
12. GUIBELALDE, E, FERNANDEZ, J M, VAÑÓ, E ET AL, Image quality and patient dose for different screen-film combinations, Br. J. Radiol., 67, 166-173 (1994).
13. STIEVE, F E, HAGEMANN, G and STENDER, H, Relationship between medical requirements and technical parameters of good imaging performance and acceptable dose, Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 49, 3-18 (1993).