Investigating microclimatic influences on ozone injury in clover (Trifolium subterraneum) using artificial neural networks

New Phytologist

Volumn 132, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 271-280

  Balls, G R ^a   Palmer Brown, D ^a   Sanders, G E ^a  

^a NOTTINGHAM TRENT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Artificial neural networks; Microclimate; Ozone injury; Trifolium subterraneum

Indexed keywords

TRIFOLIUM SUBTERRANEUM;

EID: 0030019369     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01846.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aben JMM, Janssen-Jurkovicova M, Adema EH. 1990. Effects of low-level ozone exposure under ambient conditions on photosynthesis and stomatal control of Vicia faba L. Plant, Cell and Environment 13: 463-469.
2. Aphalo PJ, Jarvis PG. 1991. Do stomata respond to relative humidity? Plant, Cell and Environment 14: 127-132.
3. 2 and water vapour in the air. Plant, Cell and Environment 16: 771-783.
4. Assmann SM, Gershenson A. 1991. The kinetics of stomatal responses to VPD in Vicia faba: electrophysiological and water relations models. Plant, Cell and Environment 14: 455-465.
5. Avissar R, Avissar P, Mahrer Y, Bravdo BA. 1985. A model to stimulate response of plant stomata to environmental conditions. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 34: 21-29.
6. Batter JC. 1991. Effects of humidity on stomatal density and its relation to leaf conductance. Scientia Horticulturae 48: 2-212.
7. Balls GR, Palmer-Brown D, Sander GE 1995. The use of artificial neural networks to model plant-environment interactions. Pesticide Science.
8. Davalo E, Niam P. 1990. Neural netwoks. Translated by Rawsthorne A. Macmillan, 111-112.
9. Dawn T. 1994. Neural computing makes its mark in science. Scientific Computing 3: 25-30.
10. Dayhoff JE. 1990. Neural network architectures : an introduction. Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1-20.
11. Farage PK, Long SP, Lechner EG, Baker NR. 1991. The sequence change within the photosynthetic apparatus of wheat following short-term exposure to ozone. Plant Physiology 95: 529-535.
12. Farquhar GD, Sharkey TD. 1982. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 33: 317-345.
13. Fuhrer J. 1994. The critical level for ozone to protect agricultural crops - an assessment of data from European open-top chamber experiments. Proceedings of the Critical Levels of Ozone Workshop, number 16, Bern, Switzerland, 1-4 November (1993), 42-57
14. Graham S, Ormrod DP. 1989. Sorption of ozone by 'New Yorker' tomato leaves. Environmental Pollution 58: 213-220.
15. Grandjean-Grimm A, Fuhrer J. 1992. The response of spring wheat (Triticum acsticum L., cv. Albis) to ozone at higher elevations. I. Measurement of ozone and carbon dioxide fluxes in open-top field chambers. Physiologica Plantarum 77: 389-394.
16. Grantz, DA. 1990. Plant response to atmospheric humidity. Plant, Cell and Environment 13: 667-679.
17. Grantz, DA, Muinzer FC. 1990. Stomatal response to humidity in a sugarcane field simultaneous porometric and micrometeorological measurements. Plant, Cell and Environment 13: 27-37.
18. Grants DA, Zeiger E. 1986. Stomatal responces to light and leafair water vapour pressure difference show similar kinetics in sugar cane and soybean. Plant Physiology 81: 865-868.
19. Guzy MR, Heath RL. 1994. Responses to ozone of varieties of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). New Phytologist 124: 617-625.
20. Kappen, L, Haeger, S. 1991. Stomatal responses of Tradescantia albiflora to changing air humidity in light and darkness. Journal of Experimental Botany 42: 979-986.
21. Kerstiens G, Lendzian KJ. 1989. Interactions between ozone and plant cuticles. I. Ozone deposition and permeability. New Phytologist 112: 13-19.
22. Koyabashi K, Miller JE Flagler, RB, Heck WW. 1990. Modelling the effects of ozone on soybean growth and yield. Environmental pollution 65: 33-64.
23. 2 into leaves and effects on photosynthesis. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 95, 195-213.
24. Lichtenthaler HK, Wellburn AR. 1983. Determination of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochemical Society Transactions 11: 591-592.
25. Losch R, Tenhunen JD. 1981. Stomatal responses to humidity. In: Jarvis PG, Mansfield TA, eds. Stomatal Physiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 137-161.
26. Miller CA, Davis DD. 1981. Effect of temperature on Stomatal conductance and ozone injury of pinto bean leaves. Plant Disease 65: 750-751.
27. Mortensen LM. 1992. Effects of ozone concentration on growth of tomato at various light, air humidity and carbon dioxide levels. Scientia Horticulturae 49: 17-24.
28. Olsson T, Leverenz JW. 1994. Non-uniform Stomatal closure and the apparent convexity of the photosynthetic photon flux density response curve. Plant, Cell and Environment 17: 701-710.
29. Otto HW, Daine RH. 1969. Plant injury by air pollutants: influence of humidity on stomatal apertures and plant responses to ozone. Science 163 1209-1210
30. Pihl-Karlsson G. Selldén G, Skärby L, Pleijel H. 1995. Clover as an indicator plant for phytotoxic ozone concentrations: visible injury in relation to species, leaf age and exposure dynamic. New Phytologist 129: 355-365.
31. QUARG. 1993. Urban air quality in the United Kingdom first report of the Quality of Urban Air Review Group. London: UK Department of the Environment. 111-116.
32. Reich PB. 1987. Quantifying plant response to ozone: a unifying theory. Tree Physiology 3: 63-91.
33. Sanders GE, Balls GR, Booth CE. 1994. Ozone critical levels for agricultural crops - analysis and interpretation of the results from the UN-ECE International Cooperative Programme for Crops. Proceedings of the Critical Levels for Ozone Workshop, number 16, Bern, Switzerland, 1-4 November (1993), 58-72.
34. Sanders GE, Colls JJ, Clark AG. 1992. Physiological changes in Phaseolus vulgaris in response to long-term ozone exposure. Annals of Botany 69: 123-133.
35. Schut HE. 1985. Models for the physiological effects of short ozone exposures on plants. Ecological Modelling 30, 175-207.
36. Simpson R, et al. 1992. Biological pattern recognition by neural networks. Marine Ecology Progress Series 79: 303-308.
37. Temple PJ. 1986. Stomatal conductance and transpirational responses of field-grown cotton to ozone. Plant, Cell and Environment 9: 315-321.
38. Tingey DT, Hogsett WE. 1985. Water stress reduces ozone injury via a stomatal mechanism. Plant Physiology 77: 944-947.
39. Tonneijck AEG. 1994. Use of several plant species as indicators of ambient ozone: exposure-response relationships. Proceedings of the Critical Levels for Ozone Workshop, number 16, Bern., Switzerland, 1-4 November (1993), 288-293.
40. UNECE. 1993. Manual on methodologies and criteria for mapping critical levels/loads and geographical areas where they are exceeded. Texte 25/93, Unweltbundesamt, Bismarckplatz 1, W-1000 Berlin 33, Germany.
41. Unsworth MH. 1982. Exposure to gaseous pollutants and uptake by plants. In: Unsworth MH, Ormrod DP. eds. Effects of Gaseous Pollution in Agriculture and Horticulture. Butterworh Scientific, 43-63.
42. Un win DM. 1980. Microclimate measurements for ecologists. Biological Techniques Series. New York and London: Academic Press, 71-82.
43. Van Pul WAJ, Jacobs AFG. 1993. The conductance of a marine crop and the underlying soil to ozone and other various environmental canditions. Boundary Layer Meteorology 69: 83-99.