Q-methodology and subjective research

Journal of Social and Administrative Pharmacy

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 54-62

  Mrtek, Robert G ^a   Tafesse, Eskinder ^a   Wigger, Ulrike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS   (United States)

Author keywords

affective domain; attitude assessment; curriculum, pharmaceutical; methodology; opinion assessment; pharmaceutical care; Q methodology; Q technique; subjective research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; PHARMACY;

EID: 0030017637     PISSN: 02810662     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Redburn FS. Q factor analysis: Application to educational testing and program evaluation. Educational and psychological measurement 1975; 35: 767-778.
2. Stephenson W. The shame of science. Ethics in science and medicine 1978; 5: 25-38.
3. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Fourth generation evaluation, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1989.
4. McKeown B, Thomas D. Q-methodology, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1988.
5. Stephenson W. The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1953.
6. Brown SR. Political subjectivity. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1980.
7. Kerlinger FN. Foundations of behavioral research; 3rd edition. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1986.
8. Brown SR. A primer on Q-methodology, Operant Subjectivity 1993, 16(3/4): 91-138.
9. Brown SR. Q technique and method; principles and procedures. In: Berry WD. and Lewis-Beck MS. New tools for social scientists, advances and applications in research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1986: 57-76.
10. Stephenson W. The quantumization of psychological events. Operant Subjectivity 1988 12(1/2): 1-23.
11. Mrtek RG, Mrtek MB. Parsing the paradigms. The case for human values in the pharmacy curriculum. Am J Pharm Educ 1991; 55: 79-84.