메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 52, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 354-361

Killing and letting die: A defensible distinction

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EUTHANASIA; MEDICAL ETHICS; MORALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TERMINAL CARE;

EID: 0030011506     PISSN: 00071420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a011550     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (19)

References (8)
  • 1
    • 0009386072 scopus 로고
    • The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect
    • Foot P. Oxford: Blackwell
    • Foot P. The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect. In: Foot P. Virtues and vices. Oxford: Blackwell, 1978: 19-32
    • (1978) Virtues and Vices , pp. 19-32
    • Foot, P.1
  • 2
    • 0027448495 scopus 로고
    • Killing, letting die, and withdrawing aid
    • McMahan J. Killing, letting die, and withdrawing aid. Ethics 1993; 103: 250-79
    • (1993) Ethics , vol.103 , pp. 250-279
    • McMahan, J.1
  • 3
    • 0016431107 scopus 로고
    • Active and passive euthanasia
    • Rachels J. Active and passive euthanasia. N Engl J Med 1975; 292: 78-80
    • (1975) N Engl J Med , vol.292 , pp. 78-80
    • Rachels, J.1
  • 4
    • 2542431616 scopus 로고
    • An irrelevant consideration: Killing versus letting die
    • Steinbock B, Norcross A. eds. New York: Fordham University
    • Tooley M. An irrelevant consideration: killing versus letting die. In: Steinbock B, Norcross A. eds. Killing and letting die. 2nd edn. New York: Fordham University, 1994: 103-11
    • (1994) Killing and Letting Die. 2nd Edn. , pp. 103-111
    • Tooley, M.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.