The histomorphologic changes in vascularized bone transfers and their interrelationship with the recipient sites: A 1-year study

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 97, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 1001-1013

  Gosain, Arun K ^b   McCarthy, Joseph G ^a   Staffenberg, David ^b   Glat, Paul M ^b   Simmons, David J ^b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE GRAFT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL BONE; CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY; GRAFT SURVIVAL; MUSCLE FLAP; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; TRABECULAR BONE; ZYGOMA;

EID: 0030009655     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199604001-00018     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Peer, L. A. The fate of autogenous human bone grafts. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 3: 233, 1951.
2. Zins, J. E., and Whitaker, L. A. Membranous versus endochondral bone: Implications for craniofacial reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 72: 778, 1983.
3. Kusiak, J. F., Zins, J. E., and Whitaker, L. A. The early revascularization of membranous bone. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 76: 510, 1985.
4. Sullivan, W. G., and Szwajkun, P. R. Revascularization of cranial versus iliac crest bone grafts in the rat. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 87: 1105, 1991.
5. Chen, N. T., Glowacki, J., Bucky, L. P., et al. The roles of revascularization and resorption on endurance of craniofacial onlay bone grafts in the rabbit. Plastic Reconstr. Surg. 93: 714, 1994.
6. Smith, J. D., and Abramson, M. Membranous vs. endochondral bone autografts. Arch. Otolaryngol. 99: 203, 1974.
7. Phillips, J. H., and Rahn, B. A. Fixation effects on membranous and endochondral onlay bone-graft resorption. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 82: 872, 1988.
8. Lin, K. Y., Bartlett, S. P., Yaremchuk, M. J., et al. The effect of rigid fixation on the survival of onlay bone grafts: An experimental study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 86: 449, 1990.
9. LaTrenta, G. S., McCarthy, J. G., Breitbart, A. S., et al. The role of rigid skeletal fixation in bone-graft augmentation of the craniofacial skeleton. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 84: 578, 1989.
10. Goldberg, V. M., Shaffer, J. W., Field, G., and Davy, D. T. Biology of vascularized bone grafts. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 18: 197, 1987.
11. Cutting, C. B., and McCarthy, J. G. Comparison of residual osseous mass between vascularized and nonvascularized onlay bone transfers. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 72: 672, 1983.
12. LaTrenta, G. S., McCarthy, J. G., and Cutting, C. B. The growth of vascularized onlay bone transfers. Ann. Plast. Surg. 18: 511, 1987.
13. Antonyshyn, O., Colcleugh, R. G., and Anderson, C. Growth potential in onlay bone grafts: A comparison of vascularized and free calvarial bone and suture bone grafts. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 79: 12, 1987.
14. Antonyshyn, O., Colcleugh, R. G., and Anderson, C. Growth potential in suture bone inlay grafts: A comparison of vascularized and free calvarial bone grafts. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 79: 1, 1987.
15. Bartlett, S. P., and Whitaker, L. A. Growth and survival of vascularized and nonvascularized membranous bone: An experimental study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 84: 783, 1989.
16. Fukuta, K., Har-Shai, Y., Collares, M. V., et al. The viability of revascularized calvarial bone graft in a pig model. Ann. Plast. Surg. 29: 136, 1992.
17. Moore, J. B., Mazur, J. M., Zehr, D., et al. A biomechanical comparison of vascularized and conventional autogenous bone grafts. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 73: 382, 1984.
18. Shaffer, J. W., Field, G. A., Goldberg, V. M., and Davy, D. T. Fate of vascularized and nonvascularized autografts. Clin. Orthop. 197: 32, 1985.
19. Hardesty, R. A., and Marsh, J. L. Craniofacial onlay bone grafting: A prospective evaluation of graft morphology, orientation, and embryonic origin. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 85: 5, 1990.
20. Lozano, A. J., Cestero, H. J., Jr., and Salyer, K. E. The early vascularization of onlay bone grafts. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 58: 302, 1976.
21. Knize, D. M. The influence of periosteum and calcitonin on onlay bone graft survival. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 53: 190, 1974.
22. Thompson, N., and Casson, J. A. Experimental onlay bone grafts to the jaws: A preliminary study in dogs. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 46: 341, 1970.
23. Puckett, C. L., Hurvitz, J. S., Metzler, M. H., and Silver, D. Bone formation by revascularized periosteal and bone grafts, compared with traditional bone grafts. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 64: 361, 1979.
24. Romana, M. C., and Masquelet, A. C. Vascularized periosteum associated with cancellous bone graft: An experimental study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 85: 587, 1990.
25. Zins, J. E., Kusiak, J. F., Whitaker, L. A., and Enlow, D. H. The influence of the recipient site on bone grafts to the face. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 73: 371, 1984.
26. Treharne, R. W. Review of Wolff's law and its proposed means of operation. Orthop. Rev. 10: 35, 1981.
27. Wolff, J. Über die innere Architectur der Knochen und ihre Bedeutung für die Frage vom Knochenwachstum. Virchow's Arch. [A]50: 389, 1870.
28. Enlow, D. H. The Handbook of Facial Growth. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1982. Pp. 76-142.
29. McCarthy, J. G., Ruff, G. L., and Zide, B. M. A surgical system for the correction of bony chin deformity. Clin. Plast. Surg. 18: 139, 1991.
30. Spear, S. L., and Kassan, M. Genioplasty. Clin. Plast. Surg. 16: 695, 1989.
31. McCarthy, J. G. Microgenia: A logical surgical approach. Clin. Plast. Surg. 8: 269, 1981.