A general molecular model for the effect of multicomponent mixtures on biological systems

Food Chemistry

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 329-335

  Ennis, Daniel M ^a  

^a Institute for Perception   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINDING AFFINITY; CONFERENCE PAPER; HEART STIMULATION; MOLECULAR MODEL; ODOR; RECEPTOR BINDING; SENSORY STIMULATION; SWEETNESS; TASTE; TRANSDUCER;

EID: 0030004432     PISSN: 03088146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0308-8146(96)00057-X     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Arunlakshana, O. & Schild, H. O. (1959). Some quantitative uses of drug antagonists. Br. J. Pharmacol., 14, 48-58.
2. Beidler, L. M., (1954). A theory of taste stimulation. J. Gen. Physiology, 38, 133-9.
3. Beidler, L. M. (1962). Taste receptor stimulation. Prog. Biophys. Chem., 12, 109-151.
4. Black, J. W. (1989). Drugs from emasculated hormones: the principle of syntopic antagonism (Nobel Lecture). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 28, 886-94.
5. Black, J. W. & Leff, P. (1983). Operational models of pharmacological agonism. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 220, 141-162.
6. De Graff, C. & Frijters, J. E. R. (1986). A psychophysical investigation of Beidler's mixture equation. Chem. Senses, 11, 295-314.
7. Ennis, D. M. (1991). Molecular mixture models based on competitive and non-competitive agonism. Chem. Senses, 16, 1-17.
8. Gaddum, J. H. (1936). The quantitative effects of antagonistic drugs, Proc. Physiol. Soc. 7-9.
9. Hill, A. V. (1909). J. Physiol. London, 39, 361-73.
10. Lancet, D., Lazard, D., Heldman, J., Khen, M. & Nef, P. (1988) Molecular transduction in smell and taste. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 53, 343-48.
11. Price, S. (1984). Mechanisms of stimulation of olfactory neurons: an essay. Chem. Senses, 8, 341-54.