Prospective study design for the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph: The effect of change in focus setting

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 234, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 306-310

  Hosking, Sarah L ^a   Flanagan, John G ^b  

^a MANCHESTER ROYAL EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b TORONTO WESTERN HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; EYE FUNDUS; EYE REFRACTION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KERATOMETRY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; METHODOLOGY; OPTIC NERVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; RETINA BLOOD VESSEL; TIME; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 0030002850     PISSN: 0721832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF00220705     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Arnold JV, Gates JWC, Taylor KM (1993) Possible errors in the measurement of retinal lesions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34: 2576-2580
2. Bartz-Schmidt KU, Weber J, Heimann K (1993) Optic disc size calculations using Littmann's formula differs from in-vivo measures of the optic disc during vitrectomy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33 [Suppl]: 3979
3. Bennett AG, Rabbetts RB (1990) Clinical visual optics, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 216-228
4. Blaker JW (1980) Toward an adaptive model of the human eye. J Opt Soc Am 70: 220
5. Filliben JJ (1975) The probability plot coefficient test for normality. Technometrics 17: 111-117
6. Navarro R, Santamaria J, Bescos J (1985) Accommodation dependent model for the human eye. J Opt Soc Am [A] 2: 1273-1281
7. Fach J, Pennell DO, Romano PE (1989) Optic disc photogrammetry: magnification factors for eye position, centration, and ametropias, refractive and axial; and their application in the diagnosis of the optic nerve hypoplasia. Ann Ophthalmol 21: 454-462
8. Spencer AF, Sadiq SA, Pawson P, Vernon SA (1995) Vertical optic disc diameter: discrepancy between planimetric and SLO measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36: 796-803