The relation between heavy alcohol use and bar patronage: A latent growth model

Journal of Studies on Alcohol

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 410-418

  Curran, Patrick J ^a   Harford, Thomas C ^a,b   Muthén, Bengt O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ALCOHOL ABUSE; ARTICLE; CATERING SERVICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; ETHNIC GROUP; FEMALE; GENDER; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MARRIAGE; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; STATISTICAL MODEL;

EID: 0030002475     PISSN: 0096882X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15288/jsa.1996.57.410     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. BARON, R.M. AND KENNY, D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Per. Soc. Psychol. 51: 1173-1182, 1986.
2. BENTLER, P.M. EQS Structural Equations Program Manual, Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software, 1989.
3. BRYK, A.S. AND RAUDENBUSH, S.W. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Pubns., Inc., 1992.
4. CASSWELL, S., ZHANG, J.F. AND WYLLIE, A. The importance of amount and location of drinking for the experience of alcohol-related problems. Addiction 88: 1527-1534, 1993.
5. CLARK, W. Demographic characteristics of tavern patrons in San Francisco. Q. J. Stud. Alcohol 27: 316-327, 1966
6. CLARK, W. Public drinking contexts: Bars and taverns. In: HARFORD, T.C. AND GAINES, L.S. (Eds.) Social Drinking Contexts, NIAAA Research Monograph No. 7, DHHS Publication No. (ADM) 81-1097, Washington: Government Printing Office, 1981, pp.8-33.
7. CLARK, W. Alcohol use in various settings. In: SINGLE, E. AND STORM, T. (Eds.) Public Drinking and Public Policy, Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation, 1985, pp. 49-70.
8. CRONBACH, L.J. Research on classrooms and schools: Formulation of questions, design, and analysis. The Stanford Evaluation Consortium, Occasional Papers, July, 1976.
9. DUNCAN, T.E., DUNCAN, S.C. AND HOPS, H. The effects of family cohesiveness and peer encouragement on the development of adolescent alcohol use: A cohort-sequential approach to the analysis of longitudinal data J. Stud. Alcohol 55: 588-599, 1994.
10. DWYER, J.H. Statistical Models for the Social and Behavioral Sciences, New York: Oxford Univ. Press, Inc., 1983.
11. FILLMORE, K.M. Women's drinking across the adult life course as compared to men's. Brit. J. Addict. 82: 801-811, 1987.
12. FISHER, J.C. Psychosocial correlates of tavern use: A national probability sample study In: HARFORD, T. AND GAINES, L. (Eds.) Social Drinking Contexts, NIAAA Research Monograph No. 7, DHHS Publication No. (ADM) 81-1097, Washington: Government Printing Office, 1981, pp. 34-53.
13. GIBBONS, R D., HEDEKER, D., ELKIN, I., WATERNAUX, C., KRAEMER, H.S., GREENHOUSE, J.B., SHEA, T., IMBER, S.D., SOTSKY, S.M. AND WATKINS, J.T. Some conceptual and statistical issues in analysis of longitudinal psychiatric data: Application to the NIMH treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program dataset. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 50: 739-750, 1993.
14. HARFORD, T.C. Policy implications of a contextual analysis of drinking. Paper presented at the 21st International Institute on the Prevention and Treatment of Alcoholism. Helsinki Finland, 1975.
15. HARFORD, T.C. The integration of observation with other methods: Surveys of public drinking. In: SINGLE, E. AND STORM, T. (Eds.) Public Drinking and Public Policy, Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation, 1985, pp. 191-207.
16. HARFORD, T.C., GERSTEL, E.K., PAUTLER, C. AND HOBAN, C. Social activity and drinking patterns. In: GALANTER, M. (Ed.) Currents in Alcoholism, Vol. VII, New York: Grune & Stratton, 1980, pp. 373-383.
17. JOHNSTON, L.D., O'MALLEY, P.M. AND BACHMAN, J.G. Drug use among American high school seniors, college students, and young adults, 1985-1990, Vol. I. High school seniors, DHHS Publication No. (ADM) 91-1813, 1991.
18. JÖRESKOO, K.G. AND SÖRBOM, D. LISREL 7: User's Reference Guide, Mooresville, Ind.: Scientific Software International, Inc., 1989.
19. LAIRD, N.M. AND WARE, H. Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 38: 963-974, 1982.
20. MCARDLE, J.J. Dynamic but structural equation modeling of repeated measures data. In: NESSELROADE, J.R., AND CATTELL, R.B., (Eds.) Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology, 2d Edition, New York: Plenum Press, 1988, pp. 561-614.
21. MCARDLE, J.J. AND EPSTEIN, D. Latent growth curves within developmental structural equation models. Child Development 58: 110-133, 1987.
22. MEREDITH, W. AND TISAK, J. "Tuckerizing" curves. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Santa Barbara, Calif., 1984.
23. MEREDITH, W. AND TISAK, J. Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika 55: 107-122, 1990.
24. MUTHÉN, B. LISCOMP: Analysis of Linear Structural Equations with a Comprehensive Measurement Model, Mooresville, Ind.: Scientific Software, 1987.
25. MUTHÉN, B. Analysis of longitudinal data using latent variable models with varying parameters. In: COLLINS, L.M., AND HORN, J.L., (Eds.) Best Methods for the Analysis of Change: Recent Advances, Unanswered Questions, Future Directions, Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Assn., 1991.
26. MUTHÉN, B. Latent variable modeling of growth with missing data and multilevel data. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Multivariate Analysis, Barcelona, Spain, 1992.
27. MUTHÉN, B. AND CURRAN, P.J. Power to detect intervention effects in growth modeling. Paper presented at the Workshop on Scientific Structure for the Emerging Field of Prevention Research, Johns Hopkins University, December 5-6, 1994.
28. RAO, C.R. Some statistical methods for the comparison of growth curves. Biometrics 14: 1-17, 1958.
29. ROGOSA, D.R. Causal models do not support scientific conclusions: A comment in support of Freedman. J. Educ. Stat. 12: 185-195, 1987.
30. SINGLE, E. AND WORTLEY, S. Drinking in various settings as it relates to demographic variables and level of consumption: Findings from a national survey in Canada. J Stud. Alcohol 54: 590-599, 1993.
31. SKOG, O.-J. Social interaction and the distribution of alcohol consumption. J. Drug Issues 10: 71-92, 1980.
32. STOCKWELL, T., LANG, E. AND RYDON, P. High risk drinking settings: The association of serving and promotional practices with harmful setting. Addiction 88: 1519-1526, 1993.
33. TUCKER, L.R. Determination of parameters of a functional relation by factor analysis. Psychometrika 23: 19-23, 1958.
34. WILLETT, J.B. AND SAYER, A.G. Using covariance structure analysis to detect correlates and predictors of individual change over time. Psychol. Bull. 116: 363-381, 1994.