Image cytometric analysis in pathology

Human Pathology

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 482-493

  Cohen, Cynthia ^a,b  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Anatomic Pathology   (United States)

Author keywords

DNA ploidy; image analysis; image cytometry; proliferation; receptor quantitation

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ANGIOGENESIS; ASTROCYTOMA; BLADDER CARCINOMA; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER CYTODIAGNOSIS; COLORECTAL CARCINOMA; CONFERENCE PAPER; ENDOMETRIUM CARCINOMA; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMAGE ANALYSIS; OVARY CARCINOMA; PLOIDY; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATE CARCINOMA; TROPHOBLASTIC TUMOR;

EID: 0030000454     PISSN: 00468177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0046-8177(96)90091-X     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (135)

1. Falkmer UG: Image DNA cytometry: Diagnostic and prognostic applications in clinical tumor pathology. Cell Vision 1:79-83, 1994
2. Simonson MS: Image analysis microscopy: Principles and applications. Biotechniques 3:484-493, 1985
3. Wells WA, Rainier RO, Memoli VA: Basic principles of image processing. Am J Clin Pathol 98:493-501, 1992
4. Ruby SG, McNally AC: Cultured cell line controls for digital image DNA ploidy analysis. Am J Clin Pathol 100:345, 1993 (abstr)
5. Kiss R, Salmon I, Camby I, et al: Characterization of factors in routine laboratory protocols that significantly influence the Feulgen reaction. J Histochem Cytochem 41:935-945, 1993
6. Makkus ACF, van't Hof-Grootenboer AE, Pahlplatz MMM, et al: Practical aspects of fixatives in high resolution nuclear image analysis. Cytometry 15:302-310, 1994
7. Giroid F, Montmasson MP: Re-evaluation of optimal Feulgen reaction for automated cytology: Influence of fixatives. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 11:87-95, 1989
8. Mikel UV, Fishbein WN, Bahr GF: Some practical considerations in quantitative absorbance microspectrophotometry: Preparation techniques in DNA cytophotometry. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 7:107-118, 1985
9. Taylor SR, Titus-Ernstoff L, Stitely S: Central values and variation of measured nuclear DNA content in imprints of normal tissues determined by image analysis. Cytometry 10:382-387, 1989
10. Suit PF, Bauer TW: DNA quantitation by image cytometry of touch preparations from fresh and frozen tissue. Am J Clin Pathol 94:49-53, 1990
11. Farnsworth WV, DeRose PB, Cohen C: DNA image cytometric analysis of paraffin-embedded sections of small renal cortical neoplasms. Cytometry (Communications in Clinical Cytometry) 18:223-227, 1994
12. Baak JP, Ladekarl M, Sorensen FB: Reproducibility of mean nuclear volume and correlation with mean nuclear area in breast cancer: An investigation of various sampling schemes. HUM PATHOL 25:80-85, 1994
13. Schneller J, Eppich E, Greenebaum E, et al: Flow cytometry and Feulgen cytophotometry in evaluation of effusions. Cancer 59:1307-1313, 1987
14. Fleege JG, van Diest PJ, Baak JPA: Computer assisted efficiency testing of different sampling methods for selective nuclear graphic tablet morphometry. Lab Invest 63:270-275, 1990
15. Russack V: Image cytometry: Current applications and future trends. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 31:1-34, 1994
16. Lee AKC, Dugan J, Hamilton WM, et al: Quantitative DNA analysis in breast carcinomas: A comparison between image analysis and flow cytometry. Mod Pathol 4:178-182, 1991
17. Weaver DL, Bagwell CB, Hitchcox SA, et al: Improved flow cytometric determination of proliferative activity (S-phase fraction) from paraffin-embedded tissue. Am J Clin Pathol 94:576-584, 1990
18. Luzi P, Bruni A, Mangiavacchi P, et al: Ploidy pattern and cell cycle in breast cancer as detected by image analysis and flow cytometry. Cytometry 18:79-87, 1994
19. Dawson AE, Norton JA, Weinberg DS: Comparative assessment of proliferation and DNA content in breast carcinoma by image analysis and flow cytometry. Am J Pathol 136:1115-1124, 1990
20. Elsheikh TM, Silverman JF, McCool JW, et al: Comparative DNA analysis of solid tumors by flow cytometric and image analyses of touch imprints and flow cell suspensions. Am J Clin Pathol 98:296-304, 1992
21. Ghali VS, Liau S, Teplitz C, et al: A comparative study of DNA ploidy in 115 fresh-frozen breast carcinomas by image analysis versus flow cytometry. Cancer 70:2668-2672, 1992
22. Danque POV, Chen H, Patil J, et al: Image analysis versus flow cytometry for DNA ploidy quantitation of solid tumors: A comparison of six methods of sample preparation. Mod Pathol 6:270-275, 1993
23. Kowal-Vern A, Swinnen LJ, Shankey V, et al: Flow and image cytometric DNA analysis of postcardiac transplant lymphomas. Mod Pathol 7:332-338, 1994
24. Wojcik EM, Katz RL, Johnston DA, et al: Comparative analysis of DNA ploidy and proliferative index in fine needle aspirates of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas by image analysis and flow cytometry. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 15:151-157, 1993
25. Yoshida Y, Okamura T, Kanematsu T, et al: Comparison between microspectrophotometry and cytofluorometry in measurements of nuclear DNA in human hepatocellular carcinomas. Cancer 62:755-759, 1988
26. Pullman J, Wilburn S, Bur M, et al: Ploidy determination: A comparison of four commonly used methods. Lab Invest 62:81A, 1990 (abstr)
27. Jhala N, Morale B, Stearns M, et al: Comparison between flow cytometry and image cytometry in ploidy distribution assessments in benign hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma of prostate. Am J Clin Pathol 100:320, 1993
28. Kenny-Moynihan MB, Gal AA, Kornstein MJ, et al: DNA cytometry in thymic neoplasms: A comparison between flow and image cytometry and correlation with clinical outcome. Lab Invest 70:164A, 1994 (abstr)
29. Epstein JI, Christensen WN, Steinberg GD, et al: Comparison of DNA ploidy and nuclear size, shape and chromatin irregularity in tissue sections and smears of prostatic carcinoma. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 12:352-358, 1990
30. Schimmlpenning H, Hamper K, Falkmer UG, et al: Methodologic aspects of DNA assessment by means of image cytometry in tumors of the salivary glands: A comparison between the results obtained using sections and cytospin preparations from the same paraffin-embedded specimens. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 11:379-383, 1989
31. Chieco P, Van Noorden C: Mod Pathol 9:84, 1995 (Letter)
32. Cohen C, DeRose PB: Mod Pathol 9:85, 1996 (Letter)
33. Sapi Z, Hendricks JB, Pharis PG, et al: Tissue section image analysis of breast neoplasms: Evidence of false aneuploidy. Am J Clin Pathol 99:714-720, 1993
34. Thomas M, Andreas G, Gregor M, et al: Tissue section image analysis: Comparison of different software releases. Am J Clin Pathol 101:673-674, 1994
35. Bacus JW, Bacus JV: A method of correcting DNA ploidy measurements in tissue sections. Mod Pathol 7:652-664, 1994
36. Sklarew RJ, Bodmer SC, Pertschuk LP: Comparison of microscopic imaging strategies for evaluating immunocytochemical (PAP) steroid receptor heterogeneity. Cytometry 12:207-220, 1991
37. Mauri FA, Veronese S, Frigo B, et al: ER1D5 and H222 (ERICA) antibodies to human estrogen receptor protein in breast carcinomas: Results of a multicentric comparative study. Appl Immunohistochem 2:157-163, 1994
38. Lee K, Chang JKC: 1D5: A superior anti-estrogen receptor antibody reactive in routine paraffin sections. Adv Anat Pathol 1:52-55, 1994
39. Battifora H, Mehta P, Ahn C, et al: Estrogen receptor immunohistochemical assay in paraffin-embedded tissue: A better gold standard? Appl Immunohistochem 1:39-45, 1993
40. Battifora H: Immunocytochemistry of hormone receptors in routinely processed tissues: The new gold standard. Appl Immunohistochem 2:143-145, 1994
41. Allred DC: Should immunohistochemical examination replace biochemical hormone receptor assays in breast cancer? Am J Clin Pathol 99:1-3, 1993
42. Miller RT, Harke MR, Greene GL: Immunocytochemical assay for estrogen receptor with monoclonal antibody D753 Pg in routinely processed formaldehyde-fixed breast tissue: Comparison with frozen section assay and with H-222 MAb. Cancer 71:3541-3546, 1993
43. Elias JM, Helmann A, Margiotti M: A comparison of immunocytochemical receptor analyses of frozen and paraffin section with enzyme immunoassay in breast cancer. Am J Clin Pathol (submitted)
44. Stylianodou A, Papadimitriou CS: Immunohistochemical demonstration of estrogen receptors on routine paraffin sections of breast carcinomas: A comparison with frozen sections and an enzyme immunoassay. Oncology 49:15-21, 1992
45. Pertschuk LP, Kim DS, Nayer K, et al: Immunocytochemical estrogen and progestin receptor assays in breast cancer with monoclonal antibodies: Histopathologic, demographic, and biochemical correlations and relationship to endocrine response and survival. Cancer 66:1663-1670, 1990
46. Anderson J, Poulsen HS: Immunohistochemical estrogen receptor determination in paraffin-embedded tissue: Predication of response to hormonal treatment in advanced breast cancer. Cancer 64:1901-1908, 1989
47. Gown AM, De Wever N, Battifora H: Microwave-based antigenic unmasking: A revolutionary new technique for routine immunohistochemistry. Appl Immunohistochem 1:256-266, 1993
48. Kell DL, Kamel OW, Rouse RV: Immunohistochemical analysis of breast carcinoma estrogen and progesterone receptors in paraffin-embedded tissue: Correlation of clones ER1D5 and 1A6 with a cytosol-based hormone receptor assay. Appl Immunohistochem 1:275-281, 1993
49. Leong AS-Y, Milios J: Comparison of antibodies to estrogen and progesterone receptors and the influence of microwave-antigen retrieval. Appl Immunohistochem 1:282-288, 1993
50. Esteban JM, Kandalaft PL, Mehta P, et al: Improvement of the quantification of estrogen and progesterone receptors in paraffinembedded tumors by image analysis. Am J Clin Pathol 99:32-38, 1993
51. Pellicer EM, Sundblad A: Evaluation antibodies to estrogen receptors. Appl Immunohistochem 2:141, 1994 (letter)
52. Esteban JM, Ahn C, Battifora H, et al: Predictive value of estrogen receptors evaluated by quantitative immunohistochemical analysis in breast cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 102:S9-S12, 1994 (suppl 1)
53. El-Badawy N, Cohen C, DeRose PB, et al: Immunohistochemical progesterone receptor assay: Measurement by image analysis. Am J Clin Pathol 96:704-710, 1991
54. El-Badawy N, Cohen C, DeRose PB, et al: Immunohistochemical estrogen receptor assay: Quantitation by image analysis. Mod Pathol 4:305-309, 1991
55. Baddoura FK, Cohen C, Unger ER, et al: Image analysis for quantitation of estrogen receptor in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections of breast carcinoma. Mod Pathol 4:91-95, 1991
56. Santeusanio G, Mauriello A, Schiaroli S, et al: Densitometric and morphometric study of immunocytochemical estrogen receptors detection in breast carcinomas. Pathol Res Pract 188:478-483, 1992
57. Remmele W, Schicketanz K-H: Immunohistochemical determination of estrogen and progesterone receptor content in human breast cancer: Computer-assisted image analysis (QIC score) vs. subjective grading (IRS). Pathol Res Pract 189:862-866, 1993
58. Aziz DC: Quantitation of estrogen and progesterone receptors by immunocytochemical and image analysis. Am J Clin Pathol 98:105-111, 1992
59. Sebo TJ, Roche PC, Witzig TE, et al: Proliferative activity in non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: A comparison of the bromodeoxyuridine labeling index with PCNA immunostaining and quantitative image analysis. Am J Clin Pathol 99:668-672, 1993
60. Katz RL, Wojcik EM, El-Naggar AK, et al: Proliferation markers in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: A comparative study between cytophotometric quantitation of Ki-67 and flow cytometric proliferation index on fine needle aspirates. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 15:179-186, 1993
61. Caulet S, Lesty C, Raphael M, et al: Comparative quantitative study of Ki-67 antibody staining in 78 B and T cell malignant lymphoma (ML) using two image analyser systems. Pathol Res Pract 188:490-496, 1992
62. Kennedy JC, El-Badawy N, DeRose PB, et al: Comparison of cell proliferation in breast carcinoma using image analysis (Ki-67) and flow cytometric systems. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 14:304-311, 1992
63. Sawhney N, Hall P: Ki67: Structure, function and new antibodies. J Pathol 168:161-162, 1992
64. Cattoretti G, Becker MHE, Key G, et al: Monoclonal antibodies against recombinant parts of the Ki-67 antigen (MIB 1 and MIB 3) detect proliferating cells in microwave-processed formalin-fixed paraffin sections. J Pathol 168:357-363, 1992
65. Hall PA, Levison DA, Woods AL, et al: Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) immunolocalization in paraffin sections: An index of cell proliferation with evidence of deregulated expression in some neoplasms. J Pathol 162:285-294, 1990
66. Schwarting R: Little missed markers and Ki-67. Lab Invest 68:597-599, 1993
67. Leong AS-Y, Milios J, Tang SK: Is immunolocalization of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in paraffin sections a valid index of cell proliferation? Appl Immunohistochem 1:127-135, 1993
68. Weidner N: Tumor angiogenesis: Review of current applications in tumor prognostication. Semin Diagn Pathol 10:302-313, 1993
69. Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, et al: Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis: Correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med 324:1-8, 1991
70. Friedman M, Middleman B, DeRose PB, et al: Image cytometric quantitation of angiogenesis in primary malignant melanomas: Prognostic significance. Mod Pathol 8:136A, 1995 (abstr)
71. Williams JK, Carlson GW, Cohen C, et al: Tumor angiogenesis as a prognostic factor in oral cavity tumors. Am J Surg 168:373-380, 1994
72. Bacus SS, Bacus JW, Slamon DJ, et al: HER-2 Neu oncogene expression and DNA ploidy analysis in breast cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med 114:164-169, 1990
73. Maudelonde T, Brouillet JP, Roger P, et al: Immunostaining of cathepsin D in breast cancer: Quantification by computerized image analysis and correlation with cytosolic assay. Eur J Cancer 28A:1686-1691, 1992
74. Ross DW: Clinical usefulness of DNA ploidy and cell cycle studies. Arch Pathol Lab Med 117:10, 1993
75. Herman CJ, Hedley D, Wheeless LL, et al: DNA cytometry in cancer prognosis. Principles of Practical Oncology 7:1-8, 1993
76. Mellin W: Cytophotometry in tumor pathology: A critical review of methods and applications, and some results of DNA analysis. Pathol Res Pract 186:37-62, 1990
77. Zarbo RJ, Linden MD: DNA analysis of gastrointestinal and genitourinary tract neoplasms, in Keren DF, Hanson CA, Hurtubise PE (eds): Flow Cytometry and Clinical Diagnosis. Chicago, IL, American Society of Clinical Pathologists, 1994, pp 470-539
78. Furlong JW: DNA analysis of breast, lung, central nervous system, endocrine, and head and neck tumors, in Keren DF, Hanson CA, Hurtubise PE (eds): Flow Cytometry and Clinical Diagnosis. Chicago, IL, American Society of Clinical Pathologists, 1994, pp 541-595
79. Hanna W, McReady DR, Chapman JW, et al: The predictive value of ERICA in breast cancer recurrence: A univariate and multivariate analysis. Mod Pathol 6:748-754, 1993
80. Merkel DE, McGuire WL: Ploidy, proliferative activity and prognosis: DNA flow cytometry of solid tumors. Cancer 65:1194-1205, 1990
81. Vartanian RK, Weidner N: Correlation of intratumoral endothelial cell proliferation with microvessel density (tumor angiogenesis) and tumor cell proliferation in breast carcinoma. Am J Pathol 144:1188-1194, 1994
82. Toi M, Kashitani J, Tominaga T: Tumor angiogenesis is an independent prognostic indicator in primary breast carcinoma. Int J Cancer 55:371-374, 1993
83. Macchiarini P, Fontanini G, Hardin MJ, et al: Relation of neovascularisation to metastasis of non-small-cell lung cancer. Lancet 340:145-146, 1992
84. Weidner N, Carroll PR, Flax J, et al: Tumor angiogenesis correlates with metastasis in invasive prostate carcinoma. Am J Pathol 143:401-409, 1993
85. Hedley DW, Clarke GM, Cornelisse CJ, et al: Consensus review of the clinical utility of DNA cytometry in carcinoma of the breast. Cytometry 14:482-485, 1993
86. Aaltomaa S, Lipponen P, Syrjanen K: Prognostic value of cell proliferation in breast cancer as determined by proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) immunostaining. Anticancer Res 12:1281-1286, 1992
87. Lee AKC, Wiley B, Dugan JM: Quantitative DNA analysis and proliferation in breast carcinomas: A comparison between image analysis and flow cytometry. Pathol Res Pract 188:428-432, 1992
88. Bauer KD, Bagwell CB, Giaretti W, et al: Consensus review of the clinical utility of DNA flow cytometry in colorectal cancer. Cytometry 14:486-491, 1993
89. Shankey TV, Kallioniemi OP, Koslowski JM, et al: Consensus review of the clinical utility of DNA content cytometry in prostate cancer. Cytometry 14:497-500, 1993
90. Song J, Cheng WS, Cupps RE, et al: Nuclear deoxyribonucleic acid content measured by static cytometry: Important prognostic association for patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma treated by external beam radiotherapy. J Urol 147:794-797, 1992
91. Zetterberg A, Forssland G: Ploidy level and tumor progression in prostatic carcinoma. Acta Oncol 30:193-199, 1991
92. Wheeless LL, Badalament RA, deVere White RW, et al: Consensus review of the clinical utility of DNA cytometry in bladder cancer. Cytometry 14:478-481, 1993
93. Amberson JB, Laino JP: Image cytometric deoxyribonucleic acid analysis of urine specimens as an adjunct to visual cytology in the detection of urothejial cell carcinoma. J Urol 149:42-45, 1993
94. Koss LG, Wersto RP, Simmons DA, et al: Predictive value of DNA measurements in bladder washings: Comparison of flow cytometry, image cytophotometry, and cytology in patients with a past history of urothelial tumors. Cancer 64:916-924, 1989
95. Badalament RA, Gay H, Whitmore WF, et al: Monitoring intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin treatment of superficial bladder carcinoma by serial flow cytometry. Cancer 58:2751-2757, 1986
96. Hemstreet GP, Rollins S, Jones P, et al: Identification of a high risk subgroup of grade I transitional cell carcinoma using image analysis based deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy analysis of tumor tissue. J Urol 146:1525-1529, 1991
97. Blomjous EC, Schipper NW, Baak JP, et al: The value of morphometry and DNA flow cytometry in addition to classic prognosticators in superficial urinary bladder carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 91:243-248, 1989
98. Russo A, Macaluso MP, Dardanoni G, et al: Role of flow cytometric analysis in human bladder cancer. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 16:67-68, 1994 (abstr)
99. Walts AE, Morimoto R, Marchevsky AM: Computerized interactive morphometry and the diagnosis of lymphoid-rich effusions. Am J Clin Pathol 99:570-575, 1993
100. Yeaton P, Kiss R, Deviere J, et al: Use of cell image analysis in the detection of cancer from specimens obtained during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Am J Clin Pathol 100:497-501, 1993
101. Padberg B-C, Arps H, Franke U, et al: DNA cytophotometry and prognosis in ovarian tumors of borderline malignancy: A clinicomorphologic study of 80 cases. Cancer 69:2510-2514, 1992
102. Kuhn W, Kaufmann M, Feichter GE, et al: DNA flow cytometry, clinical and morphological parameters as prognostic factors for advanced malignant and borderline ovarian tumors. Gynecol Oncol 33:360-367, 1989
103. Tan LK, Flynn SD, Carcangiu ML: Ovarian serous borderline tumors with lymph node involvement: Clinicopathologic and DNA content study of seven cases and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol 18:904-912, 1994
104. Seidman JD, Norris HJ, Griffin JL, et al: DNA flow cytometric analysis of serous ovarian tumors of low malignant potential. Cancer 71:3947-3951, 1993
105. Barclay IDR, Dabbagh L, Babiak J, et al: DNA analysis (ploidy) of molar pregnancies with image analysis on paraffin tissue sections. Am J Clin Pathol 100:451-455, 1993
106. Lage JM, Popek EJ: The role of DNA flow cytometry in evaluation of partial and complete hydatidiform moles and hydropic abortions. Semin Diagn Pathol 10:267-274, 1993
107. Kirkegaard LJ, DeRose PB, Cohen C: Image cytometric quantitation of nuclear proliferation markers (MIB-1, PCNA) in astrocytomas: Prognostic significance. Mod Pathol 8:136A, 1995 (abstr)
108. Zaprianov Z, Christov K: Histological grading, DNA content, cell proliferation and survival of patients with astroglial tumors. Cytometry 9:380-386, 1988
109. Astion ML, Wilding P: The application of backpropagation neural networks to problems in pathology and laboratory medicine. Arch Pathol Lab Med 116:995-1001, 1992
110. Dawson AE, Austin RE Jr, Weinberg DS: Nuclear grading of breast carcinoma by image analysis: Classification by multivariate and neural network analysis. Am J Clin Pathol 95:S29-S37, 1991 (suppl 1)
111. Erler BS, Hsu L, Truong HM, et al: Image analysis and diagnostic classification of hepatocellular carcinoma using neural networks and multivariate discriminant functions. Lab Invest 71:446-451, 1994
112. Mann JM, Jennison SH, Moss E, et al: Assessment of rejection in orthotopic human heart transplantation using proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) as an index of cell proliferation. J Pathol 167:385-389, 1992
113. Smolle J, Stolz W, Bahmer FA, et al: Analytic morphology in clinical and experimental dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol 29:86-97, 1993
114. Cowan JM: Fishing for chromosomes: The art and its applications. Diagn Mol Pathol 3:209-216, 1994
115. Matsuta M, Matsuta M, Kon S, et al: Interphase cytogenetics of melanocytic neoplasms: Numerical aberrations of chromosomes can be detected in interphase nuclei using centromeric DNA probes. J Cutan Pathol 21:1-6, 1994
116. Lockett SJ, Herman B: Automatic detection of clustered, fluorescent-stained nuclei by digital image-based cytometry. Cytometry 17:1-12, 1994
117. Celeda D, Aldinger K, Haar F, et al: Rapid fluorescence in situ hybridization with repetitive DNA probes: Quantification by digital image analysis. Cytometry 17:13-25, 1994
118. Muller S, DeRose PB, Cohen C: DNA ploidy of ameloblastoma and ameloblastic carcinoma of the jaws: Analysis by image and flow cytometry. Arch Pathol Lab Med 117:1126-1131, 1993
119. Bosari S, Lee AKC, Wiley BD, et al: Flow cytometric and image analyses of colorectal adenocarcinomas: A comparative study with clinical correlations. Am J Clin Pathol 99:187-194, 1993
120. Bosari S, Lee AK, Wiley BD, et al: DNA quantitation by image analysis of paraffin-embedded colorectal adenocarcinomas and its prognostic value. Mod Pathol 5:324-328, 1992
121. Bottger T, Storkel S, Stockle M, et al: DNA image cytometry: A prognostic tool in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus? Cancer 67:2290-2294, 1991
122. Dorman AM, Walsh TN, Droogan O, et al: DNA quantification of squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus by flow cytometry and cytophotometric image analysis using formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue. Cytometry 13:886-892, 1992
123. Erler BS, Truong HM, Kim SS, et al: A study of hepatocellular carcinoma using morphometric and densitometric image analysis. Am J Clin Pathol 100:151-157, 1993
124. Bui HX, Ballouk F, del Rosario A, et al: Nuclear DNA content and clinical follow-up in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 15:389-395, 1993
125. Bottger TC, Storkel S, Wellek S, et al: Factors influencing survival after resection of pancreatic cancer: A DNA analysis and a histomorphologic study. Cancer 73:63-73, 1994
126. Lack EE: Pathology of adrenal and extra-adrenal paraganglia. Philadelphia, PA, Saunders, 1994, pp 182; 309-310
127. Herzberg AJ, Kerns BJ, Honkanen FA, et al: DNA ploidy and proliferation index of soft tissue sarcomas determined by image cytometry of fresh frozen tissue. Am J Clin Pathol 97:S29-S37, 1992 (suppl 1)
128. Bottger TC, Gabbert H, Stockle TC, et al: DNA image cytometry in stomach carcinoma: Its relation to histomorphologic parameters and its influence on prognosis. Cancer 70:1819-1824, 1992
129. Knuechel R, Burgau M, Rueschoff J, et al: Proliferating cell nuclear antigen in normal urothelium and urothelial lesions of the urinary bladder: A quantitative assessment using a true color image analysis system. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol 64:137-144, 1993
130. Mittal KR, Demopoulos RI, Goswami S: Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (cyclin) expression in normal and abnormal cervical squamous epithelia. Am J Surg Pathol 17:117-122, 1993
131. Nakano T, Oka K: Differential values of Ki-67 index and mitotic index of proliferating cell population: An assessment of cell cycle and prognosis in radiation therapy for cervical cancer. Cancer 72:2401-2408, 1993
132. Cohen C, Wells SJ, Rubin EM, et al: Prognostic significance of DNA ploidy and proliferative activity in hepatocellular cacinoma: An image cytometric study. Int J Surg Pathol 2:332, 1995 (abstr)
133. Takahashi H, Strutton GM, Parsons PG: Determination of proliferating fractions in malignant melanomas by anti-PCNA/cyclin monoclonal antibody. Histopathology 18:221-227, 1991
134. Chaney JV, Schroer KR, Lyman GH, et al: Prognostic significance of proliferation index in intermediate (1.51-4.00 mm) thickness malignant melanoma. Am J Clin Pathol 100:311, 1993 (abstr)
135. Kerns BJ, Jordan PA, Faerman LL, et al: Determination of proliferation index with MIB-1 in advanced ovarian cancer using quantitative image analysis. Am J Clin Pathol 101:192-197, 1994