Ventricular protection against atrial arrhythmias in DDD pacing based on a statistical approach: Clinical results

PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 19, Issue 11 II, 1996, Pages 1729-1733

  Gencel, Laurent ^a,g   Geroux, Laurence ^b   Clementy, Jacques ^a   Shah, Dipen ^a   Cazeau, Serge ^c   Saoudi, Nadir ^d   Pioger, Guy ^e   Lavergne, Thomas ^f  

^a BORDEAUX UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b ELA Recherche   (France)

^c Centre Chirurgical Val d'Or   (France)

^d ROUEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^e Clinique Alleray Labrouste   (France)

^f HÔPITAL BROUSSAIS   (France)

^g HAUT LÉVÊQUE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

atrial arrhythmias; DDD pacing; mode switch

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEART ATRIUM ARRHYTHMIA; HEART PACING; HEART PROTECTION; HOLTER MONITORING; HUMAN; HYPERTROPHIC OBSTRUCTIVE CARDIOMYOPATHY; MALE; SENSOR; SINUS NODE DYSFUNCTION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SUPRAVENTRICULAR PREMATURE BEAT;

EID: 0029999513     PISSN: 01478389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03215.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Payne GE, Williams H, Skehan JD. An approach in the assessment of pacing hemodynamics: A comparison of VVI and DDD. PACE 1995; 18: 1861-1867.
2. Sulk N, Dritsas A, Bostock J, et al. "Subclinical" pacemaker syndrome: A randomised study of symptom free patients with ventricular demand (VVI) pacemakers upgraded to dual chamber devices. Br Heart J 1992; 67:57-64.
3. Feuer J, Shandling A, Messenger J, et al. Influence of cardiac pacing mode on the long term development of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1989; 64: 1376-1379.
4. Gross J, Moser S, Benedeck ZM, et al. Clinical predictors and natural history of atrial fibrillation in patients with DDD pacemakers. PACE 1990; 13: 1828-1831.
5. Detollenaere M, Wassenhove E, Jordaens L. Atrial arrhythmias in dual chamber pacing and their influence on long-term mortality. PACE 1992; 15: 1846-1850.
6. Cazeau S, Garrigue S, Ritter P, et al. DDD pacing and atrial arrhythmia in sinus node dysfunction: Long-term follow-up using the Holter function of the device. PACE 1996; 19:637.
7. Greenspon A, Greenberg R, Frankl W. Tracking of atrial flutter during DDD pacing: Another form of pacemaker-mediated tachycardia. PACE 1984; 7: 955-960.
8. Barold S, Mond H. Fallback responses of dual chamber (DDD and DDDR) pacemakers: A proposed classification. PACE 1994; 17:1160-1165.
9. Deharo JC, Macaluso G, Djiane P. Systems of protection of dual-chamber pacemakers against atrial arrhythmias. Arch Mal Coeur 1996; 89:465-470.
10. Mayumi H, Uchida T, Shinozaki K, et al. Use of a dual chamber pacemaker with a novel fallback algorithm as an effective treatment for sick sinus syndrome associated with transient supraventricular tachyarrhythmia. PACE 1993; 16:992-1000.
11. Sohier S. Particularités du Meta DDDR 1256 Intérêt clinique. Stimucoeur 1996; 24:51-53.
12. Ovsyshcher I, Katz A, Bondy C. Initial experience with a new algorithm for automatic mode switching from DDDR to DDIR mode. PACE 1994; 17: 1908-1912.
13. Ritter P, Cazeau S, Kojoukharof Y, et al. Impact of different programming settings on the initiation of fallback protection in DDD pacing during abrupt exercise. PACE 1993; 16:1196.
14. Den Dulk K, Dijkman B, Pieterse M, et al. Initial experience with mode switching in a dual sensor, dual chamber pacemaker in patients with paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias. PACE 1994; 17: 1900-1907.