An evaluation of Duke University's live for life health promotion program and its impact on employee health

American Journal of Health Promotion

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 340-342

  Goetzel, Ron Z ^a   Kahr, Toby Y ^b   Aldana, Steven G ^c   Kenny, Gayle M ^b  

^a MEDSTAT Group   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSENTEEISM; ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION; BLOOD PRESSURE; EMPLOYEE; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUTRITION; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; SMOKING CESSATION; STRESS; TRAFFIC SAFETY; WEIGHT REDUCTION; WELLBEING;

EID: 0029999029     PISSN: 08901171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-10.5.340     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. O'Donnell MP, Harris JS. Health promotion in the workplace. Albany, NY: Delmar, 1994.
2. Knight KK, Goetzel RZ, Fielding JE, et al. An evaluation of Duke University's Live for Life health promotion program on changes in worker absenteeism. J Occup Med 1994;36:533-6.
3. Stone W, Rothstein D, Shoenhair C. Coronary heart disease risk factors and health related fitness in long-term exercising versus sedentary corporate executives. Am J Health Promot 1991;5:169-72.
4. Foote A, Erfurt C. Controlling hypertension: a cost-effective model. Prev Med 1977;6:319-43.
5. Stamler R, Gosch C, Stamler F. A hypertension control program based on the workplace. J Occup Med 1978;20:618-25.