Time use and physicians' exploration of the reason for the office visit

Family Medicine

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 264-270

  Bergh, Kent D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBULATORY CARE; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; OUTPATIENT; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; SIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME;

OFFICE VISITS; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; TIME; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 0029997632     PISSN: 07423225     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Simpson M, Buckman R, Stewart M, et al. Doctor-patient communication: the Toronto consensus Statement. BMJ 1991;303:1385-7.
2. Huygen F, Mokkink H, Smits A, van Son J, Meyboom W, van Eyk J. Relationship between the working styles of general practitioners and the health status of their patients. Br J Gen Pract 1992;42:141-4.
3. Howie JGR, Porter AMD, Forbes JF. Quality and the use of time in general practice: widening the discussion. BMJ 1989;298:1008-10.
4. Lassen LCHR. Connections between the quality of consultations and patient compliance in general practice. Fam Pract 1991;8:154-60.
5. Botelho RJ. A negotiation model for the doctor-patient relationship. Fam Pract 1992;9:211-8.
6. Bensing J. Doctor-patient communication and the quality of care. Soc Sci Med 1991;32:1301-10.
7. Levenstein JH, McCracken EC, McWhinney IR. The patient-centered clinical method. I: A model for the doctor-patient interaction in family medicine. Fam Pract 1986;3:75-9.
8. Brown JB, Stewart MA, Tessier S. Manual: the patient-centered clinical method. London, Ontario, Canada: Thames Valley Family Practice Research Unit, Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, University of Western Ontario, 1993.
9. Tuckett D, Boulton M, Olson C, Williams A. Meetings between experts. London: Tavistock, 1986.
10. Stewart M, Brown JB, Weston WW. Patient-centered interviewing. Part III. Five provocative questions. Can Fam Physician 1989;35:159-61.
11. Howie JGR, Hopton JL, Heaney DJ, Porter AMD. Attitudes to medical care, the organization of work, and stress among general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract 1992;42:181-5.
12. Roter DL. Patient participation in the patient-provider interaction: the effects of patient question-asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction, and compliance. Health Educ Monogr 1977;5:281-315.
13. Callahan EJ, Bertakis KD. Development and validation of the Davis Observation Code. Fam Med 1991;23:19-24.
14. Pendleton D, Schofield T, Tate P, Havelock P. The consultation: an approach to learning and teaching. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1989.
15. Pridham KF, Hansen MF. An observation methodology for the study of interactive clinical problem-solving behavior in primary care settings. Med Care 1980;18:360-75.
16. Butler NM, Campion PD, Cox AD. Exploration of doctor and patient agendas in general practice consultations. Soc Sci Med 1992;35:1145-55.
17. Nessa J, Malterud K. Discourse analysis in general practice: a sociolinguistic approach. Fam Pract 1990;7:77-83.
18. Zweig S, Williamson HA. Adverse effects of faculty practice on diagnostic content of residents' outpatient experience. J Fam Pract 1987;25(5):491-6.
19. Byrne PS, Long BEL. Doctors talking to patients. Exeter, England: Royal College of General Practitioners, 1976.
20. Kraan HF, Crijnen A, Zuidweg J. Evaluating undergraduate training: a checklist for medical interviewing skills. In: Stewart M, Roter D, eds. Communicating with medical patients. London: Sage, 1989:167-77.
21. Grol R, van Beurden W, Binkhorst T, Toemen T. Patient education in family practice: the consensus reached by patients, doctors, and experts. Fam Pract 1991:8:133-9.
22. Ridsdale L, Morgan M, Morris R. Doctor's interviewing technique and its response to different booking time. Fam Pract 1992;9:57-60.
23. Smits AJ, Meyboom WA, Mokkink HG, van Son JA, van Eyk J. Medical versus behavioral skills: an observation study of 75 general practitioners. Fam Pract 1991;8:14-8.