The impact of educational level on occupational and physical therapists' perceptions of professional status

Occupational Therapy Journal of Research

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 147-165

  Bellner, Anna Lena ^a,b  

^a JÖNKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

educational reform; professionalization process; rehabilitation epistemology

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; REVIEW; SWEDEN;

EID: 0029996619     PISSN: 02761599     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/153944929601600301     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Barris, R., & Kielhofner, G. (1985). Generating and using knowledge in occupational therapy: Implications for professional education. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 5(2), 113-124.
2. Bellner, A-L. (1991). Specialist or generalist - on professional development of occupational and physical therapists. Licentiate dissertation, Institute of Tema Research, Department of Health and Society, Linköping University, Sweden.
3. Bellner, A-L. (1992). Professionalization and clinical science: An empirical study of occupational and physical therapists. Unpublished manuscript, Institute of Tema Research, Department of Health and Society, Linköping University, Sweden.
4. Bellner, A-L. (1994). The specialist-generalist debate. In M. Ellis (Ed.), Congress Summaries: Vol. 2. 11th International Congress of the World Federation of Occupational Therapists (pp. 741-743). London.
5. Bellner, A-L. (in press). Working conditions influencing professionalization of Swedish occupational and physical therapists. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy.
6. Bergman, B. (1989). Being a physiotherapist: Professional role, utilization of time, and vocational strategies. Unpublished dissertation, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Umeå, Sweden.
7. Bergman, L. R., & Wänneryd, B. (1982). On data collection in survey studies. Stockholm: Liber Allmänna Förlaget.
8. Blalock, H. M. (1979). Social statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
9. Carr-Saunders, A. M., & Wilson, P. (1964). The professions. London: University Press.
10. Collins, R. (1990). Market closure and the conflict theory of professions. In R. Torstendahl & M. Burrage (Eds.), Professions in history: Rethinking the study of professions. London: Sage.
11. Ek, K. M. (1990). Physical therapy as communication: Microanalysis of treatment situations. Unpublished dissertation, Michigan State University, MI.
12. Etzioni, A. (Ed.). (1969). The semi-professions and their organizations: Teachers, nurses and social workers. New York: Free Press.
13. Friedson, E. (1970). Profession of medicine: A study of the sociology of applied knowledge. New York: Harper & Row.
14. Gill, T. (1984). Professional certification procedures: A developmental forecast for the year 2000. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51(1), 31-36.
15. Golin, A. K., & Ducanis, A. J. (1981). The interdisciplinary team. London: Aspen Systems Corporation.
16. Greenwood E. (1957). Attributes of a profession. Social Work, 2(3), 44-55.
17. Field, P. (1983). An ethnography: Four public health nurses' perspective on nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 8, 3-12.
18. Heberlein, T., & Baumgartner, R. (1978). Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis of the published literature. American Sociological Review, 43(4), 447-462.
19. Hellberg, I. (1978). Studies in professional organization. Unpublished dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Göteborg, Sweden.
20. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work. New York: Wiley.
21. Hinshaw, A., Schmeltzer, C., & Atwood, J. (1987). Innovative retention strategies for nursing staff. Journal of Nursing Administration, 17, 8-16.
22. Jongbloed, L. (1984). Substitutability of work and the professionalization of occupational therapists. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 131-133.
23. Kielhofner, G., & Burke, J. P. (1983). The evolution of knowledge in occupational therapy: Past, present, and future. In G. Kielhofner (Ed.), Health through occupation: Theory and practice in occupational therapy. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Co.
24. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of the scientific revolutions. Chicago: University Chicago Press.
25. Melia, K. M. (1984). Student nurses' construction of occupational socialization. Sociology and Health and Illness, 2, 132-149.
26. Moore, W. (1974). The professions: Roles and rules. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
27. Parker, H. J., & Chan, F. (1986). Prestige of allied health professions: Perceptions of occupational and physical therapists. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 4, 247-250.
28. Parkin, F. (1979). Marxism and class theory: A bourgeois critique. London: Routledge.
29. Parsons, T. (1968). Professions. In The International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, (pp. 536-547). New York: MacMillan.
30. Rossides, D. (1990). The synthesis: A sociopolitical critique of the liberal professions. Social Epistemology, 4(2), 229-258.
31. Sarfatti-Larson, M. (1977). The rise of professionalism. A sociological analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
32. Schön, D. A. (1987). Reflective practice and policy controversies. In Forchheimer C. (Ed.), Knowledge and communication in the computer age. Sweden: Linköping University. Symposium, Institute of Tema Research Linköping University, Sweden.
33. SFS. (1977). Högskolelag (Higher Education Act). (pp. 218). Stockholm: Svensk författningssamling.
34. Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. London: McGraw-Hill International Book Company.
35. Treiman, D. J. (1977). Occupational prestige in comparative perspective. New York: Academic Press.
36. Wolfe, G. A. (1981). Burnout of therapists: Inevitable or preventable? Physical Therapy, 61, 1046-1050.