Electrical responses from locally detached retina and its recovery after reattachment

Ophthalmologica

Volumn 210, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 195-199

  Kim, Si Dong ^a   Nao I, Nobuhisa ^a   Maruiwa, Futoshi ^a   Sawada, Atsushi ^a  

^a Miyazaki Medical College   (Japan)

Author keywords

Electroretinogram; Focal electroretinogram; Retinal detachment

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; B WAVE; ELECTRORETINOGRAM; NONHUMAN; RABBIT; RETINA DETACHMENT;

EID: 0029994707     PISSN: 00303755     EISSN: 14230267     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000310707     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Foulds WS, Ikeda H: The effects of detachment of the retina on the induced and resting ocular potentials in the rabbit. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1966:5:93-108.
2. Blach RK, Behrman J: The electrical activity of the eye in retinal detachment. Trans Ophthalmol SocUK 1967:87:263-266.
3. Hamasaki DI, Maehemer R, Norton EWD: Experimental retinal detachment in the owl monkey. VI. The ERG of the detached and reattached retina. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1969;177:212-221.
4. Biersdorf WR, Oilier DA: Local clcctroretino-gram in macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 1969:68:296-303.
5. Birch DG, Jost BF, Fish GE: The focal electro-retinogram in fellow eyes of patients with idiopathic macular holes. Arch Ophthalmol 1988; 106:1558-1563.
6. Miyake Y, Awaya S: Stimulus deprivation amblyopia: Simultaneous recording of local macular electroretinogram and visual evoked response. Arch Ophthalmol 1984:102:998-1003.
7. Chisholm IA, McClure E, Foulds WS: Functional recovery of the retina after retinal detachment. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1975:95:167-172.
8. Foulds WS, Reid H, Chisholm IA: Factors influencing visual recovery after retinal detachment surgery. Mod Probl Ophthalmol 1974:12:49-57.
9. McPherson AR, O'Malley RE, Butner RW, Beltangady SS: Visual acuity after surgery for retinal detachment with macular involvement. Ann Ophthalmol 1982:14:639-645.
10. Tatti P, Robertson DM, Langworthy A: Prognosis for central vision and anatomic rcattaehmcnt in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with macula detached. Am J Ophthalmol 1981;92: 611-620.
11. Bagolini B, Porciatti V, Falsini B, Scalia G, Merendino E: Simultaneous recorded macular and paramacular ERGs in diseases affecting the central retina. Doc Ophthalmol 1988:68:273-282.
12. Gouras P, Mackay CJ: Light adaptation of the electroretinogram: Diminished in retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989:30: 619-624.
13. Marmor MF, Abdul-Rahim AS, Cohen DS: The effect of metabolic inhibitors on retinal adhesion and subrctinal fluid rcabsorption. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1980;19:893-903.
14. Seiple WH, Siegel IM, Carr RE, Mayron C: Evaluating macular function using the focal ERG. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1986;27: 1123-1130.
15. Mori T, Tsue TT, Marmor MF: Electrical responses from detached retina inside the intact rabbit eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988;29: 1040-1043.
16. Flonda S: Studies of the ERG on the experimental retinal detachment. Acta Soc Ophthalmol Jpn 1969:73:948-971.
17. Anderson DLL Stern WH, Fisher SK, Erickson PA. Borgula GA: Retinal detachment in the cat: The pigment epithelial-photoreccptor interface. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1983;24:906-971.
18. Lith GHM, van Torren K, van der Vijifvinkel-Bruiaenga S: ERG and VECPs in retinal detachments. Doc Ophthalmol 1981:50:291-297.
19. Guerin C, Anderson DH, Fariss RN, Fisher SK: Retinal rcattaehmcnt of the primate macular: Photoreceptor recovery after short-term detachment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989;30: 1707-1725.
20. Tami A: Studies on the early receptor potential in the human eye. VII. ERP of the reattached retina. Proc 16th ISCEV Symp, Morioka, 1979, pp 315-319.
21. Berman EL, Gouras P, Hoff M, Bethesda BA: Temporal aspects of the electroretinogram. Arch Ophthalmol 1969,81:207-214.
22. Sandberg MA, Effron MH, Berson EL: Focal cone elcctrorctinograms in dominant retinitis pigmentosa with reduced penetrance. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1978:17:1096-1101.
23. Kroll AJ, Machemer R: Experimental retinal detachment and rcattaehmcnt in the rhesus monkey: Electron microscopic comparison of rods and cones. Am J Ophthalmol 1969;68:58-77.