Do monocyte ADCC assays accurately predict the severity of hemolytic disease of the newborn caused by antibodies to high-frequency antigens?

Immunohematology

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 20-26

  Garner, S F ^a   Devenish, A ^a  

^a North London Blood Transfusion Centre   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBODY TITER; ANTIGEN EXPRESSION; ARTICLE; BIOASSAY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EFFECTOR CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MONOCYTE; NEWBORN HEMOLYTIC DISEASE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 0029994598     PISSN: 0894203X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Gunson HH, Phillips PK, Stratton F. Manipulative and inherent errors in anti-D quantitation using the AutoAnalyzer. J Clin Pathol 1972;25:198-205.
2. Garratty G. Predicting the clinical significance of red cell antibodies with in vitro cellular assays. Transfus Med Rev 1990;4:297-312.
3. Engelfriet CP, Overbeeke MAM, Dooren MC, Ouwehand WH, von dem Borne AEGKr. Bioassays to determine the clinical significance of red cell alloantibodies based on Fc receptor-induced destruction of red cells sensitized by IgG. Transfusion 1994;34:617-26.
4. Zupanska B, Brojer E, Richards Y, Lenkiewicz B, Seyfried H, Howell P. Serological and immunological characteristics of maternal anti-Rh(D) antibodies in predicting the severity of haemolytic disease of the newborn. Vox Sang 1989;56:247-53.
5. Report from nine collaborating laboratories. Results of tests with different cellular bioassays in relation to severity of RhD haemolytic disease. Vox Sang 1991;60:225-9.
6. Lucas GF, Hadley AG, Nance SJ, Garratty G. Predicting hemolytic disease of the newborn: a comparison of the monocyte monolayer assay and the chemiluminescence test. Transfusion 1993;33;484-7.
7. Garner SF, Gorick BD, Lai WYY, et al. Prediction of the severity of haemolytic disease of the newborn: quantitative IgG anti-D subclass determinations explain the correlation with functional assay results. Vox Sang 1995;68:169-76.
8. Kaye T, Williams EM, Garner SF, Leak MR, Lumley H. Anti-Sc1 in pregnancy. Transfusion 1990;30:439-40.
9. a (abstract). Tranfus Med 1990;(Supp 1):26.
10. k antenatal patient (abstract). Tranfus Med 1990; (Supp 1):26.
11. b not causing haemolytic disease of the newborn. Vox Sang 1991;61:77.
12. null proposita. Vox Sang 1992;63:-13-7.
13. Walker RH, ed. Technical manual, 11th ed. Bethesda, MD: American Association of Blood Banks, 1993:661.
14. Marsh WL. Scoring of hemagglutination reactions. Transfusion 1972;12:352-3.
15. Engelfriet CP, Ouwehand WH. ADCC and other cellular bioassays for predicting the clinical significance of red cell alloantibodies. In: Contreras M, ed. Blood transfusion: the impact of new technologies. Baillière's Clinical Haematology. London, England: Baillière Tindall, 1990:321-37.
16. Garner SF, Thomson AR, Lubenko A, Savage J. Monocyte isolation by flow cytometer monitored centrifugal elutriation: a valuable tool for antibody dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity assays. Br J Biomed Sci 1994;51:35-43.
17. Dooren MC, Kuijpers RWAM, Joekes EC, et al. Protection against immune haemolytic disease of newborn infants by maternal monocyte-reactive IgG alloantibodies (anti-HLA-DR). Lancet 1992;339:1067-70.
18. Kuijpers RWAM, Dooren MC, von dem Borne AEGKr, Ouwehand WH. Detection of human monocyte-reactive alloantibodies by flow cytometry following selective down modulation of the Fc receptor I. Blood 1991;78:2150-6.
19. b. Vox Sang 1992;62:49-52.
20. b detected during pregnancy. Clin Lab Hematol 1981;3: 351-6.
21. b blood group antigens are located on a glycoprotein of 80,000 MW (the CDw44 glycoprotein) whose expression is influenced by the In(Lu) gene. Immunology 1988;64:37-43.
22. Anstee DJ, Gardner R, Spring FA, et al. New monoclonal antibodies in CD44 and CD58: their use to quantify CD44 and CD58 on normal human erythrocytes and to compare the distribution of CD44 and CD58 in human tissues. Immunology 1991; 74:197-205.
23. Stoll M, Dalchau R, Schmidt RE. Cluster report: CD44. In: Knapp W, Dörken B, Gilks WR, Rieber EP, Schmidt RE, Stein H, von dem Borne AEGKr, eds. Leucocyte typing. IV. White cell differentiation antigens. Oxford University Press, 1989:619-22.
24. Shaw S, Luce GG, Gilks WR, et al. BP1.3 leucocyte differentiation antigen database. In: Schlossman SF, Boumsell L, Gilks W, Harlen JM, Kishimoto T, Morimoto C, Ritz J, Shaw S, Silverstein R, Springer T, Tedder TF, Todd RF, eds. Leucocyte typing. V. White cell differentiation antigens. Oxford University Press 1995:16-198.