Using elements of the Nursing Minimum Data Set for determining outcomes

Journal of Nursing Administration

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 48-56

  Blewitt, Darby K ^a   Jones, Katherine R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC ASPECT; HEALTH CARE COST; NURSING; PARATHYROIDECTOMY; REVIEW;

ADULT; DOCUMENTATION; FEMALE; GOALS; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE ADMINISTRATORS; NURSING DIAGNOSIS; NURSING RECORDS; NURSING SERVICE, HOSPITAL; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PARATHYROIDECTOMY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PILOT PROJECTS; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 0029994552     PISSN: 00020443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00005110-199606000-00014     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. U.S. Department of Commerce. U.S. Industrial Outlook. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1993.
2. Relman AS. Assessment and accountability: the third revolution in medical care. N Engl J Med. 1988; 319(18):1220-1222.
3. Hegyvary ST. Issues in outcomes research. J Nurs Qual Assurance. 1991; 5(2):1-6.
4. Bulechek GM, McCloskey JC. Defining and validating nursing interventions. Nurs Clin North Am. 1992; 27(2):289-299.
5. Bulechek GM, McCloskey JC, eds. Nursing Interventions: Treatments for Nursing Diagnoses. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1985.
6. Bulechek GM, McCloskey JC, eds. Nursing Interventions: Essential Nursing Treatments. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1992.
7. Porter-O'Grady T. The future of nursing administration. In: Decker, PJ, Sullivan EJ, eds. Nursing Administration: A Micro/Macro Approach for Effective Nurse Executives. E. Norwalk, CT: Appleton and Lange; 1992:647-658.
8. The American Nurses Association. Nursing Report Card for Acute Care Settings. Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing; 1995.
9. Werley HH, Lang NM, eds. Identification of the Nursing Minimum Data Set. New York: Springer Publishing Co; 1988.
10. McCormick KA, Lang N, Zielstorff R, et al. Toward standard classification schemes for nursing language: recommendations of the American Nurses Association Steering Committee on Databases to support clinical nursing practice. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 1994; 1(6):421-427.
11. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. NANDA Nursing Diagnosis: Definitions and Classifications. Philadelphia, PA: NANDA, 1992.
12. Johnson M, Gardner D, Kelly K, et al. The Iowa model: a proposed model for nursing administration. Nurs Econ. 1994; 9(4):255-262.
13. Mark BA. The black box of patient outcomes research. Image: J Nurs Scholarship. 1995; 27(1):42.
14. Dougherty CM, Jankin JK, Lunney MR, Whitley GG. Conceptual and research-based validation of nursing diagnoses: 1950 to 1993. Nurs Diagn. 1993; 4(4):156-161.
15. Lutjens LRJ. The nature and use of nursing diagnosis in hospitals. Nurs Diagn. 1993; 4(3):107-113.
16. Myers JL, Perry AG, Wessler R, et al. Staff nurses' identification of nursing diagnoses from a simulated patient situation. In: Hurley M, ed. Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Proceedings of the Sixth Conference. St. Louis: CV Mosby Co; 1986.
17. Fehring RJ. Validating diagnostic labels: standardized methodology. In: ME Hurley, ed. Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Proceedings of the 6th conference. St. Louis: The CV Mosby Company; 1986:183-190.
18. Friss L. The nursing shortage: do we dislike it enough to cure it? In: Ward MJ, Price SA, eds. Issues in Nursing Administration. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1991:367-377.