Some priorities in maximizing access to and quality of contraceptive services

Advances in Contraception

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 233-237

  Shelton, J D ^a   Davis, S S ^a  

^a UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTION; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; FAMILY PLANNING; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; REVIEW;

CONTRACEPTION; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 0029994229     PISSN: 02674874     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF01849666     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Pariani S, Heer DM, Van Arsdol MD. Does choice make a difference to contraceptive use? Evidence from East Java. Stud Farn Plann. 1991;22(6):384-90.
2. Population Council. Nigeria: The family planning situation analysis study. 1992.
3. Family Health International. Network. September 1991.
4. Family Health International. Network. September 1991.
5. Lei Z, Wu SC, Garceau RJ et al. Effect of pretreatment counseling on discontinuation rates in Chinese women given depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception. Contraception. 1996;53:357-61.
6. Population Council. Peruvian family planning situation analysis study. 1992.
7. Shelton JD, Angle MA, Jacobstein RA. Medical barriers to access to family planning. Lancet. 1992;340:1334-5.
8. WHO. Improving access to quality care in family planning: medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. 1996.
9. Population Council. Pakistan situation analysis. 1992.
10. Population Council. A situation analysis of family planning service delivery points in Ghana. 1994.