Comparison of continuously recorded sensor and sinus rates during daily life activities and standardized exercise testing: Efficacy of automatically optimized rate adaptive dual sensor pacing to simulate sinus rhythm

PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 19, Issue 11 II, 1996, Pages 1672-1677

  Lau, Chu Pak ^a   Leung, Sum Kin ^a   Guerola, Modesto ^b   Crijns, H J G M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b HOSPITAL CLÍNIC   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

automaticity; dual sensors; programming

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; CHRONOTROPISM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPLETE HEART BLOCK; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; SENSOR; SINUS RHYTHM; TREADMILL EXERCISE; WORKLOAD;

EID: 0029993815     PISSN: 01478389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03204.x     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Lau CP. The range of sensors and algorithms used in rate adaptive cardiac pacing (review). PACE 1992; 15:1177-1211.
2. Connell DT and the Topaz Study Group. Initial experience with a new single sensor dual sensor rate responsive pacemaker. PACE 1993; 16: 1833-41.
3. Ovsyshcher I, Guldal M, Karazguz R, et al. Evaluation of a new rate adaptive ventricular pacemaker controlled by double sensors. PACE 1995; 18: 386-400.
4. Van Krieken FM, Perrins JP, Sigmund M. Clinical results of automatic slope adaptation in a dual sensor VVIR pacemaker. PACE 1992; 15: 1815-1820.
5. Lau CP, Pietersen A, Ohm O, et al. Automatic implant detection for initiating lead polarity programming and rate adaptive sensors: A multicenter study (abstract). PACE 1996; 19:592.
6. Leung SK, Lau CP, Wu CW, et al. Quantitative comparison of rate response and oxygen uptake kinetics between different sensor modes in multisensor rate adaptive pacing. PACE 1994; 17: 1920-1927.
7. Lau CP, Leung SK. Clinical usefulness of rate adaptive pacing systems: What should we assess? (editorial) PACE 1994; 17:2233-2235.
8. Lau CP, Butrous GS, Ward DE, et al. Comparison of exercise performance of six rate-adaptive right ventricular cardiac pacemakers. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63:833-838.
9. Mehta D, Lau CP, Ward DE, et al. Comparative evaluation of chronotropic response of activity sensing and QT sensing rate responsive pacemakers to different activities. PACE 1988; 11:1405-1414.
10. Hayes DL, Christiansen JR, Vlietstra RE, et al. Follow-up of an activity sensing, rate-modulated pacing device, including transtelephonic exercise assessment. Mayo Clin Proc 1989; 64:503-508.
11. Leung SK, Choi YC, Lau CP, et al. Does the programmed lower rate affect the rate response in rate adaptive pacemakers? PACE 1992; 15:579.