Principles of ploidy analysis by static cytometry

Journal of Clinical Pathology - Clinical Molecular Pathology

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 1996, Pages

  Smith, P S ^a   Parkinson, I H ^a   Leong, A S Y ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL AND VETERINARY SCIENCE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Histological sections; Ploidy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; NONHUMAN; PLOIDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0029992035     PISSN: 13552910     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/mp.49.2.m104     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Goldberg DM, Diamandis EP. Models of neoplasia and their diagnostic implications: a historical perspective. Clin Chem 1993;39:2360-74.
2. Carey FA. Measurement of nuclear DNA content in histological and cytological specimens: principles and applications. J Pathol 1994;172:307-12.
3. Raber MN. Clinical applications of flow cytometry. Oncology 1988;2:35-9.
4. Fallenius AG, Auer GU, Cartensen JM. Prognostic significance of DNA measurements in 409 consecutive breast cancer patients. Cancer 1988;62:331-41.
5. Shankey TV, Kallioniemi O-P, Koslowski JM, Lieber ML, Mayall BH, Miller G, et al. Consensus review of the clinical utility of DNA content cytometry in prostate cancer. Cytometry 1993;14:497-500.
6. Falkmer UG. Image DNA cytometry: Diagnostic and prognostic applications in clinical tumour pathology. Cell Vision 1994;l:79-83.
7. Bocking A, Striepecke E, Auer H, Fuzesi L. Static DNA cytometry: Biological background technique and diagnostic interpretation. In: Wied GL, Bartels PH, Rosenthal DL, Schenk U, eds. Compendium on the computerized cytology and histology laboratory. Chicago: Tutorials of Cytology, 1994:107-28.
8. Fu YS, Cheng L, Huang I, Wiesmeier E, Wettstein F, Weissman M. DNA ploidy analysis of cervical condyloma and neoplasia in specimens obtained by punch biopsy. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1989;ll:187-95.
9. Williams RA, Charlton IG, Rode J. Comparative ploidy studies using cytological and paraffin section preparations. Cytopathology 1991;2:29-37.
10. Bacus JW, Grace LJ. Optical microscope system for standardized cell measurements and analyses. Appl Optics 1987; 26:3280-93.
11. Whitaker BP, Stigliano WW, Carson FL, Lynn JA. Thionin feulgen stain for DNA (ploidy) quantitation by image analysis. J Histotechnol 1993;16:113-15.
12. Medley DW, Clark GM, Cornelisse CJ, Killander D, Kute T, Merkel D. Consensus review of the clinical utility of DNA cytometry in carcinoma of the breast. Cytometry 1993;14:482-5.
13. Leong AS-Y, Lee AKC. Biological indices in the assessment of breast cancer. J Clin Pathol: Mol Pathol 1995;48:M22138.
14. Bacus SS, Chin D, Ortiz R, Potocki D, Zelnick C. Application of image analysis in the evaluation of cellular prognostic factors in breast cancer. In: Wied GL, Bartels PH, Rosenthal DL, Schenk U, eds. Compendium on the computerized cytology and histology laboratory. Chicago: Tutorials of Cytology, 1994:143-56.
15. Shankey TV, Rabinovitch PS, Bagwell B, Bauer K, Duque RE, Hedley DW, et al. Guidelines for implementation of clinical DNA cytometry. Cytometry 1993;14:472-7.
16. Falkmer UG. Methodologie sources of errors in image and flow cytometric DNA assessments of the malignancy potential of prostatic carcinoma. Hum Pathol 1992;23: 360-7.
17. Jarvis L. Nine steps to faster ploidy assessment. Today 's Life Science 1994;6:64-9.
18. Bacus JV. The GAS 200 multiscan automated pathology workstation. In: Wied GL, Bartels PH, Rosenthal DL, Schenk U, eds. Compendium on the computerized cytology and histology laboratory. Chicago: Tutorials of Cytology, 1994:360-7.
19. McCready RW, Papadimitriou JM. An analysis of DNA cytophotometry on tissue sections in a rat liver model. Anal Quant Cytol 1983;5:117-23.
20. Hedley DW, Shankey TV, Wheeless LL. DNA cytometry consensus conference. Cytometry 1993;14:471.
21. Bacus JW, Bacus JV. A method of correcting DNA ploidy measurements in tissue sections. ModPathol 1994;7:652-64.
22. Michie BA, Black C, Reid RP, Barrett A, Hamblen DL. Image analysis derived ploidy and proliferation indices in soft tissue sarcomas: comparison with clinical outcome. J Clin Pathol 1994;47:443-7.
23. DeLamater ED, Schaechter M, Hunter ME. A chemically specific double-staining technique for deoxyribosenucleic acid and other aldehyde-yielding or aldehyde containing substances. J Histochem Cytochem 1954;2:449-52.
24. Kiss R, Gasperin P, Verhest A, Pasteels J-L. Modification of tumour ploidy level via the choice of tissue taken as diploid reference in the digital cell analysis of feulgenstained nuclei. Mod Pathol 1992;5:655-60.
25. Dorman A, Graham D, Curran B, Henry K, Leader M. Ploidy of smooth muscle tumours: retrospective image analysis study of formalin fixed, paraffin wax embedded tissue. J Clin Pathol 1990;43:465-8.
26. Bins M, Takens F. A method to estimate the DNA content of whole nuclei from measurements made on thin tissue sections. Cytometry 1985;6:234-7.
27. Rigaut JP, Persoz A. The corpuscle stereological problem re-evaluation using slab fragment volumes and application to the correction of DNA histograms from sections of spherical nuclei. J Microsc 1989;156:371-82.
28. Reith A, Danielsen H. Assessment of DNA ploidy in tumour material. Preparation and measurement by image cytometry. In: Wied GL, Bartels PH, Rosenthal DL, Schenk U, eds. Compendium on the computerized cytology and histology laboratory. Chicago: Tutorials of Cytology, 1994: 185-93.
29. Danque POV, Chen H-B, Patil J, Jagirdar J, Orsatti G, Paronetto F. Image analysis versus flow cytometry for DNA ploidy quantitation of solid tumours: a comparison of six methods of sample preparation. Mod Pathol 1993; 6:270-5.