Detergent and skin irritation

Clinics in Dermatology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 15-21

  Effendy, Isaak ^b   Maibach, Howard I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b San Francisco ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENZALKONIUM CHLORIDE; BETAINE DERIVATIVE; CETRIMIDE; DETERGENT; DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM; PROPYLENE GLYCOL; SORBITAN LAURATE; SURFACTANT;

HUMAN; LIPID MEMBRANE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SKIN IRRITATION;

DERMATITIS, IRRITANT; DETERGENTS; HUMANS; IRRITANTS; SOAPS; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS;

EID: 0029991444     PISSN: 0738081X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0738-081x(95)00103-m     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Kirk-Othmer. Encyclopedia of chemical technology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1984.
2. Löttermoser A, Stoll F. The surface and interfacial activities of salts of the fatty acid alcohol sulfuric acid esters. Kolloid-Z 1933;63:49-61.
3. Ainsworth SJ. Soaps and detergents. Chem Engin News 1992;70(3):27-63.
4. Attwood D, Florence AT. Surfactant system: Their chemistry, pharmacy and biology. London: Chapman and Hall, 1983:1-11.
5. Zografi G, Schott H, Swarbrick J. Interfacial phenomena. In: Gennaro AR, editor. Remington's pharmaceutical sciences. Easton PA: Mack, 1990:257-72.
6. Rosen MJ. Surfactants and interfacial phenomena. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1978:1-25.
7. Moran J, Addy M, Wade WG. Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations of commercial toothpastes using an agar dilution method. J Dent 1988;16:27-31.
8. Wade WG, Addy M. Antibacterial activity of some triclosan-containing toothpastes and their ingredients. J Periodontol 1992;63:280-2.
9. Reynold EF, editor. Martindale: The extra pharmacopoeia. 30th ed. London: Pharmaceutical, 1993:1215-6.
10. Blank IH. Action of soap on the skin. Arch Dermatol 1939; 39:811-7.
11. Emery B, Edwards L. The pharmacology of soaps: III. Irritant action of sodium alkyl sulphates on human skin. J Am Pharm Assoc 1940;29:254-60.
12. Van Scott EJ, Lyon JB. A chemical measure of the effect of soaps and detergents on the skin. J Invest Dermatol 1953; 21:199-204.
13. Stupel H, Szakall A. Die Wirkung von Waschmitteln auf die Haut. Heidelberg: Huthig, 1957.
14. Blank IH, Gould E, Theobald A. Penetration of cationic surfactants into the skin. J Invest Dermatol 1964;42:363-9.
15. Bettley FR. The influence of soap on the permeability of the epidermis Br J Dermatol 1961;73:448-51.
16. Mezei M, Sager RW, Stewart WD, De Ruyter AL. Dermatitic effects of non-ionic surfactants. J Pharm Sci 1966;55: 584-9.
17. Kligman AM. Evaluation of cosmetics for irritancy. Toxic Appl Pharmacol 1969;Suppl. 3:30-5.
18. Smeenk G. The influence of detergents on the skin (a clinical and biochemical study). Arch Klin Exp Derm 1969;235: 180-7.
19. Malaszkiewics J, Gloxhuber Ch. Effects of surfactants on human skin valuated by a micromethod. Arch Klin Exp Derm 1970;237:652-9.
20. Lansdown ABG, Grasso P. Physico-chemical factors influencing epidermal damage by surface active agents. Br J Dermatol 1972;86:361-73.
21. Frosch PJ, Kligman AM. The soap chamber test: A new method for assessing the irritancy of soaps. J Am Acad Dermatol 1979;1:35-41.
22. Frosch PJ. Irritancy of soaps and detergent bars. In: Frost P, Horwitz SN, editors. Principles of cosmetics for the dermatologist. St. Louis: Mosby, 1982:5-12.
23. Agner T, Serup J. Sodium lauryl sulphate for irritant patch testing - A dose-response study using bioengineering methods for determination of skin irritation. J Invest Dermatol 1990;95:543-7.
24. Wilhelm KP, Cua AB, Wolf HH, Maibach HI. Surfactant-induced stratum corneum hydration in vivo: Prediction of the irritation potential of anionic surfactants. J Invest Dermatol 1993;101:310-5.
25. Kalmanzon E, Zlotkin E, Cohen R, Barenholz Y. Liposomes as a model for the study of the mechanism of fish toxicity of sodium dodecyl sulfate in sea water. Biochem Biophys Acta 1992;1103:148-56.
26. Partearroyo MA, Ostolaza H, Goni FM, Barbera-Guillem M. Surfactant-induced cell toxicity and cell lysis. Biochem Pharmacol 1990;40:1323-8.
27. Walters KA, Bialik W, Brain KR. The effects of surfactants on penetration across the skin. Int J Cosmet Sci 1993;15: 260-70.
28. Rhein LD, Simion FA. Surfactant interactions with skin. Surfact Sci Ser 1991;32:33-49.
29. Gisslen H, Magnusson B. Effects of detergents on guinea-pig skin. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh). 1966;46:269-74.
30. Scala J, McOsker DE, Reller HH. The percutaneous absorption of ionic detergents. J Invest Dermatol 1968;50: 370-7.
31. Korting HC, Herzinger T, Hartinger A, et al. Discrimination of the irritancy potential of surfactants in vitro by two cytotoxicity assays using normal human keratinocytes, HaCaT cells and 3T3 mouse fibroblast: Correlation with in vivo data from a soap chamber assay. J Dermatol Sci 1994; 7:119-29.
32. Harvell J, Tsai YC, Maibach HI, et al. An in vivo correlation with three in vitro assays to assess skin irritation potential. J Toxic Cut Ocular Toxic 1994;13:171-83.
33. Willis CM, Stephens CJM, Wilkinson JD. Epidermal damage induced by irritants in man: a light and electron microscopic study. J Invest Dermatol 1989;93:695-9.
34. Imokawa G, Mishima Y. Cumulative effect of surfactants on cutaneous horny layers: Lysosome labilizing action. Contact Dermatitis 1979;5:151-62.
35. Kligman AM, Wooding WM. A method for the measurement and evaluation of irritants on human skin. J Invest Dermatol 1967;49:78-94.
36. Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI. Nonanoic acid irritation: A positive control at routine patch tetsing. Contact Dermatitis 1980;6:128-30.
37. Goodman M, Barry BW. Action of penetration enhancers on human stratum corneum as assessed by differential scanning calorimetry. In: Bronaugh RL, Maibach HI, editors. Percutaneous absorption: Mechanism - Methodology - Drug Delivery. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1989:567-95.
38. Scheuplein R, Ross L. Effects of surfactants and solvents on the permeability of epidermis. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1970;21:853-73.
39. LaRoche G, Eisler R, Tarzwell CM. Bioassay procedures for oil and oil dispersant toxicity evaluation. J Water Pollut Control Fed 1970;42:1982-9.
40. Varani J, Fligiel SEG, Perone P, et al. Effects of sodium lauryl sulfate on human skin in organ culture: Comparison with all-trans-retinoic acid and epidermal growth factor. Dermatology 1993;187:19-25.
41. Griffiths CEM, Finkel LJ, Tranfaglia MG, et al. An in vivo experimental model for effects of topical retinoic acid in human skin. Br J Dermatol 1993;129:389-94.
42. Berardesca E, Herbst R, Maibach HI. Plastic occlusion stress test as a model to investigate the effects of skin delipidization on the stratum corneum water holding capacity in vivo. Dermatology 1993;187:91-4.
43. Agner T. Noninvasive measuring methods for the investigations of irritant patch test reactions: A study of patients with hand eczema, atopic dermatitis and controls. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1992;Suppl. 173:1-26.
44. Lee CH, Maibach HI. The sodium lauryl sulfate irritant dermatitis model. Contact Dermatitis 1995;33:1-7.
45. Bigliardi PL, Herron MJ, Nelson RD, Dahl MV. Effects of detergents on proliferation and metabolism of human keratinocytes. Exp Dermatol 1994;3:89-94.
46. Wilhelm KP, Freitag G, Wolff HH. Surfactant-induced skin irritation and skin repair. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994; 30:944-9.
47. Budavari S, O'Neil MJ, Smith A, Heckelman PE. The Merck index: An encyclopedia of chemicals, drugs, and biologicals. 11th ed. Rahway, NJ: Merck & Co., 1989.
48. Björnberg A. Skin reactions to primary irritants in patients with hand eczema: An investigation with matched controls. Thesis. Göteborg: Oscar Isacsons, 1968.
49. Willis CM, Stephens CJM, Wilkinson JD. Differential effects of structurally unrelated chemical irritants on the density of proliferating keratinocytes in 48 h patch test reactions. J Invest Dermatol 1992;99:449-53.
50. Willis CM, Stephens CJM, Wilkinson JD. Differential patterns of epidermal leukocyte infiltration in patch test reactions to structurally unrelated chemical irritants. J Invest Dermatol 1993;101:364-70.
51. Wilmer JL, Burleson FG, Kayama F, et al. Cytokine induction in human epidermal keratinocytes exposed to contact irritants and its relation to chemical-induced inflammation in mouse skin. J Invest Dermatol 1994;102:915-22.
52. Berardesca E, Fideli D, Gabba P, et al. Ranking of surfactant skin irritancy in vivo in man using the plastic occlusion stress test (POST). Contact Dermatitis 1990;23:1-5.
53. Lesnik RH, Kligman LH, Kligman AM. Agents that cause enlargement of sebaceous glands in hairless mice: I Topical substances. Arch Dermatol Res 1992;284:100-5.
54. Eun HC, Chung JH, Jung SY, et al. A comparative study of the cytotoxicity of skin irritants on cultured human oral and skin keratinocytes. Br J Dermatol 1994;130:24-8.
55. De Groot AC, Weyland JW, Nater JP. Unwanted effects of cosmetics and drugs used in dermatology. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1994.
56. Angelini G, Foti C, Rigano L, Vena GA. 3-Dimethylaminopropylamine: A key substance in contact allergy to cocamidopropylbetaine? Contact Dermatitis 1995;32:96-9.
57. Warshaw TG, Herrmann F. Studies of skin reactions to propylene glycol. J Invest Dermatol 1952;19:423-9.
58. Frosch PJ, Kligman AM. The chamber-scarification test for assessing irritancy of topically applied substances. In: Drill VA, Lazar P, editors. Cutaneous toxicity. New York: Academic, 1977:127-39.
59. Willis CM, Stephens CJM, Wilkinson JD. Experimentally induced irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1988;18:20-4.
60. Wahlberg JE, Nilsson G. Skin irritancy from propylene glycol. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1982;64:286-90.
61. Trancik RJ, Maibach HI. Propylene glycol: Irritation or sensitization? Contact Dermatitis 1982;8:185-9.
62. Hannuksela M, Pirilä V, Salo OP. Skin reactions to propylene glycol. Contact Dermatitis 1975;1:112-6.
63. Fisher AA. Propylene glycol dermatitis. Cutis 1978;31: 166-78.
64. Catanzaro JM, Smith GJ. Propylene glycol dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1991;24:90-5.
65. Funk JO, Maibach HI. Propylene glycol dermatitis: Reevaluation of an old problem. Contact Dermatitis 1994;31: 236-41.
66. Rhein LD, Simion FA, Hill R, et al. Human cutaneous response to a mixed surfactant system: Role of solution phenomena in controlling surfactant irritation. Dermatologica 1990;180:18-23.
67. Dominguez JG, Balaguer F, Parra JL, Pelejero CM. The inhibitory effects of some amphoteric surfactants on skin irritation by alkyl sulfates. Int J Cosmet Sci 1981;3:57-68.
68. Imokawa G. Comparative study on the mechanism of irritation by sulfate and phosphate type of anionic surfactants. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1980;31:45-66.
69. Dillarstone A, Paye M. Antagonism in concentrated surfactant systems. Contact Dermatitis 1993;28:198.
70. Lee HL, Kawasaki Y, Maibach HI. Effect of surfactant mixtures on irritant contact dermatitis potential in man: Sodium lauroyl glutamate and sodium luryl sulphate. Contact Dermatitis 1994;30:205-9.
71. Malten KE, Thiele FAJ. Some measuring methods for the evaluation of orthoergic contact dermatitis: Some theoretical aspects of "orthoergic" (irritant) dermatitis. Arch Belg Dermatol 1973;28:9-21.
72. Patil SM, Singh P, Maibach HI. Cumulative irritancy in man to sodium lauryl sulfate: The overlap phenomenon. Int J Pharmacol 1994;110:147-55.
73. Harvell J, Bason MM, Maibach HI. In vitro skin irritation assays: Relevance to human skin. Clin Toxicol 1992;30: 359-69.
74. Wilhelm KP, Samblebe M, Siegers CP. Quantitative in vitro assessment of N-alkyl sulphate-induced cytotoxicity in human keratinocytes (HaCaT): Comparison with in vivo human irritation tests. Br J Dermatol 1994;130:18-23.
75. Tupker RA. Prediction of irritancy. In: Elsner P, Berardesca E, Maibach HI, editors. Bioengineering of the skin: Water and the stratum corneum. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 1994:73-85.
76. Berardesca E, Elsner P, Maibach HI, editors. Bioengineering of the skin: Cutaneous blood flow and erythema. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 1994.
77. Zhou J, Mark R, Stoudemayer T, et al. The value of multiple instrumental and clinical methods, repeated patch applications, and daily evaluations for assessing stratum corneum changes induced by surfactants. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1991;42:105-28.
78. Van der Valk PGM, Nater JP, Bleumink E. Vulnerability of the skin to surfactants in different groups of eczema patients and controls as measured by water vapour loss. Clin Exp Dermatol 1985;10:98-103.
79. Tavss E, Eigen E, Kligman AM. Letter to the editor. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1985;36:251-4.
80. Osborne R, Perkins MA. An approach for development of alternative test methods based on mechanisms of skin irritation. Food Chem Toxicol 1994;32:133-42.
81. Müller-Decker K, Fürstenberger G, Marks F. Keratinocyte-derived proinflammatory key mediators and cell viability as in vitro parameters of irritancy: A possible alternative to the Draize skin irritation test. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1994;127:99-108.
82. Rougier A, Goldberg AM, Maibach HI, editors. In vitro skin toxicology: Irritation, phototoxicity, sensitization. New York: Mary Ann Liebert, 1994.