Reliability of patient completion of the historical section of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale

Movement Disorders

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 185-192

  Louis, Elan D ^a,c   Lynch, Timothy ^a   Marder, Karen ^a,b   Fahn, Stanley ^a  

^a College of Physicians and Surgeons ^*  (United States)

^b Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain and the Gertrude H Sergievsky Center   (United States)

^c NEUROLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Disability; Parkinson's disease; Reliability; Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale

Indexed keywords

ANTIPARKINSON AGENT; LEVODOPA;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC DISEASE; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; PARKINSON DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL HISTORY TAKING; MENTAL STATUS SCHEDULE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PARKINSON DISEASE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0029988842     PISSN: 08853185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mds.870110212     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Geminiani G, Cesana BM, Tamma F, et al. Interobserver reliability between neurologists in training of Parkinson's disease rating scales: a multicenter study. Mov Disord 1991; 6:330-335.
2. Fahn S, Elton RL. members of the UPDRS Development Committee. The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. In: Fahn S, Marsden CD, Calne DB, Goldstein M, eds. Recent developments in Parkinson's disease. Vol 2. Florham Park, NJ: Macmillan Healthcare Information. 1987:153-163. 293-304.
3. van Hilten JJ, van der Zwan AD, Zwinderman AH, Roos RAC. Rating impairment and disability in Parkinson's disease: evaluation of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. Mov Disord 1994;9:84-88.
4. Reuben DB, Siu AL. An objective measure of physicial function of elderly outpatients. The physical performance test. J Am Geriatr Soc 1980;38:1105-1112.
5. Richards M, Marder K, Cote L, Mayeux R. Interrater reliability of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Motor Examination. Mov Disord 1994;9:89-91.
6. Goetz CG, Stebbins GT, Chmura TA, Fahn S, Klawans HL, Marsden CD. Teaching tape for the motor section of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. Mov Disord 1995; 10:263-266.
7. Martinez-Martin P, Gil-Nagel A, Morlan Gracia L, Balseiro Gomez J, Martinez-Sarries J, Bermejo F. The Cooperative Multicentric Group. Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale characteristics and structure. Mov Disord 1994;9:76-83.
8. Golbe LI, Pae J. Validity of mailed epidemiological questionnaire and physical self-assessment in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 1988;3:245-254.
9. Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease: a clinicopathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992;55:181-184.
10. Hughes AJ, Ben-Shlomo Y, Kilford L, Lees AJ. What features improve the accuracy of clinical diagnosis in Parkinson's disease: a clinicopathological study. Neurology 1992; 42:1142-1146.
11. Ward CD, Gibb WR. Research diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease. In: Streifler MB, Korczyn AD, Melamed E, Youdim MBH, eds. Parkinson's disease: anatomy, pathology and therapy. (Adv Neurol, Vol 53). New York: Raven Press, 1990:245-248.
12. Schwab JF, England AC. Projection technique for evaluating surgery in Parkinson's disease. In: Billingham FH, Donaldson MC, eds. Third Symposium on Parkinson's Disease. Edinburgh: Livingstone, 1969;152-157.
13. Stern Y, Sano M, Paulson J, Mayeux R. Modified Mini-Mental State Examination: validity and reliability. Neurology 1987;37(suppl 1):179.
14. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-Mental State." A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189-198.
15. Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurology 1967;17:427-442.
16. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley, 1981:222-225.
17. Fleiss JL. Measuring nominal scale agreement among raters. Psychol Bull 1979;86:974-977.
18. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 977;33:159-174.
19. Thompson WD, Walter SD. A reappraisal of the kappa coefficient. J Clin Epidemiol 1988;41:949-58.
20. Louis ED, King D, Sacco RL, Mohr JP. Upper motor neuron signs in acute stroke: prevalence, interobserver reliability, and timing of initial examination. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 1995;5:49-55.
21. Daniel WW. Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health sciences. New York: John Wiley, 1991:87-97.
22. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE. Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. Boston: PWS-KENT, 1988:80-86.
23. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual. 4th ed. Washington, DC: APA, 1994.
24. Kivela SL. Measuring disability: do self-ratings and service provider ratings compare? J Chronic Dis 1984;37:115-123.
25. Montgomery GK, Reynolds NC. Compliance, reliability, and valididity of self-monitoring for physical disturbances of Parkinson's disease. J Nerv Ment Dis 1990;178:636-641.
26. Richards M, Marder K, Cote L, Mayeux R. Reliability of symptom onset assessment in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 1994;9:340-342.
27. Ginanneschi A, Degl'Innocenti F, Magnolfi S, Maurello MT, Catarzi L, Marini P, Amaducci L. Evaluation of Parkinson's disease: reliability of three rating scales. Neuroepidemiology 1988;7:38-41.
28. Ginanneschi A, Degl'Innocenti F, Maurello MT, Magnolfi S, Marini P, Amaducci L. Evaluation of Parkinson's disease: a new approach to disability. Neuroepidemiology 1991;10: 282-287.
29. Hely MA, Chey T, Wilson A, et al. Reliability of the Columbia Scale for assessing signs of Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 1993;8:466-472.
30. Henderson L, Kennard C, Crawford TJ, et al. Scales for rating motor impairment in Parkinson's disease: studies of reliability and convergent validity. J Neural Neurosurg Psychiatry 1991;54:18-24.
31. Baas H, Stecker K, Fischer PA. Value and appropriate use of rating scales and apparative measurements in quantification of disability in Parkinson's disease. J Neural Transm Park Dis Dement Sect 1993;5:45-61.
32. Canter GJ, De la Torre R, Mier M. A method for evaluating disability in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Nerv Ment Dis 1961;133:143-147.
33. Brown RG, MacCarthy B, Jahanshahi M, Marsden CD. Accuracy of self-reported disability in patients with parkinsonism. Arch Neurol 1989;46:955-959.