Disability glare after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia

Journal of Refractive Surgery

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1996, Pages

  Niesen, Ulrike M ^a,b   Businger, Urs ^a   Schipper, Isaak ^a  

^a Cantonal Hosvital   (Switzerland)

^b LUZERNER KANTONSSPITAL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISABILITY; EXCIMER LASER; GLARE; HIGH MYOPIA; HUMAN; KERATECTOMY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECTACLES; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KERATECTOMY, PHOTOREFRACTIVE, EXCIMER LASER; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOPIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 0029988485     PISSN: 08830444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. Seiler T, Wollensak J. Myopic photorefractive keratectomy with the excimer laser. One-year follow-up. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(8):1156-1163.
2. Seiler T, Wollensak J. Results of a prospective evaluation of photorefractive keratectomy at 1 year after surgery. Ger J Ophthalmol. 1993;2(3):135-142.
3. O'Brart DPS et al. Disturbances in night vision after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Eye. 1994;8:46-51.
4. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Contrast sensitivity and glare testing in the evaluation of anterior segment disease. Ophthalmology. 1990;97(9):1233-1237.
5. Elliott DB, Bullimore MA. Assessing the reliability, discriminative ability, and validity of disability glare tests. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34(1):108-119.
6. Bailey IL, Bullimore MA. A new test for the evaluation of disability glare. Optom Vis Sci. 1991;68:911-917.
7. Maguire W. Keratorefractive surgery, success, and the public health. Editorial. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994;117:394-398.