Intrapartum fetal heart rate assessment: Which method is superior? [4]

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 174, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 1395-1396

  Sandmire, H F ^a   DeMott, R K ^a   Vintzileos, A M ^a   Knuppel, R A ^a   Guzman, E R ^a  

^a Cherney Microbiological Services   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACIDEMIA; APGAR SCORE; AUSCULTATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FETUS; FETUS DEATH; FETUS HEART RATE; FETUS HYPOXIA; FETUS MONITORING; HUMAN; LETTER; META ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

EID: 0029987760     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70697-X     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. AM Vintzileos DJ Nochimson ER Guzman RA Knuppel M Lake BS. Schifrin Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a meta-analysis Obstet Gynecol 85 1995 149 155
2. SB Thacker DF Stroup HB. Peterson Efficacy and safety of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: an update Obstet Gynecol 86 1995 613 620
3. JC Morrison BF Chez ID Davis Intrapartum fetal heart rate assessment monitoring by auscultation or electronic means AM J OBSTET GYNECOL 168 1993 63 66