A graph-grammar approach to represent causal, temporal and other contexts in an oncological patient record

Methods of Information in Medicine

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 127-141

  Muller R ^a,b   Thews, O ^a   Rohrbach, C ^a   Sergl, M ^a   Pommerening, K ^a  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER MAINZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

context representation; decision support; electronic patient record; graph grammars; graphical acquisition and retrieval

Indexed keywords

CANCER; EXPERT SYSTEM; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL RECORD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 0029986225     PISSN: 00261270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634641     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Weed L. Medical Records, Medical Education, and Patient Care: The Problem-Oriented Record as a Basic Tool. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1971.
2. Rector AL, Nowlan W, Kay S. Foundations for an electronic medical record. Meth Inform Med 1991; 30: 179-86.
3. Dick RS, Steen EB, eds. The Computer-Based Patient Record. An Essential Technology for Health Care. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1991.
4. Rector AL, Nowlan W, Kay S, Goble C, Howkins IJ. A framework for modelling the electronic medical record. Meth Inform Med 1993; 32: 109-19.
5. Weed L. Knowledge Coupling: New Premises and New Tools for Medical Care and Education. New York: Springer 1991.
6. Burger E, Musinszki C, Müller R, Nauerth U, Pommerening K, Sergl M, Thews O. Reprasentation therapeutischen Wissens in der Padiatrischen Onkologie. In: Kunath H, ed. Medizin und Information. Neue Paradigmen in Medizinischer Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie. 39. Jahrestagung der GMDS. Munchen: MMV Medizin Verlag 1994: 110-4.
7. Müller R, Musinski C, Nauerth U, Pommerening K, Sergl M. TheMPO: A knowledge-based system for therapy and monitoring in pediatric oncology. In: Dreschler-Fischer L, Pribbenow S, eds. KI-95 Activities: Workshops, Posters, Demos (Extended Abstracts). Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik e. V. 1995: 248-9.
8. Göttler H. Graphgrammatiken in der Software-Technik. Theorie und Anwendungen. Berlin: Springer 1988.
9. Schrappe M. Concept and interim analysis of trial ALL-BFM-90 for the treatment of children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Significance of therapy response in peripheral blood and bone marrow. Klinische Pädiatrie 1994; 206: 208-21.
10. Allen J. Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Comm ACM 1983; 26: 832-43.
11. Dean T, McDennott D. Temporal data base management. AI Journal 1987; 32: 1-57.
12. Galton A. Temporal Logics and their Applications. Academic Press 1987.
13. Kohane I. Temporal reasoning in medical expert systems. In: Salamon R, Blum B, Jörgensen M, eds. MEDlNFO 86. Amsterdam: North-Holland 1986; 170-4.
14. Enterline JP, Lenhard R, Blum B, eds. A Clinical Information System for Oncology. New York: Springer 1989.
15. Kahn MG, Fagan M, Tu S. Extensions to the time-oriented database model to support temporal reasoning in medical expert systems. Meth Inform Med 1991; 30: 4-14.
16. Göttler H. Zweistufige Graphmanipulationssysteme für die Semantik von Programmiersprachen (PhD-Thesis). Institut für Mathematische Maschinen und Datenverarbeitung - Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg 1977.
17. Nagl M. A software development environment based on graph technology. In: Ehrig H, Nagl M, Rozenberg G, eds. Graph Grammars and Their Applications to Computer Science (LNCS 291). Berlin: Springer 1987; 458-78.
18. Egar J, Musen MA. Graph-grammar productions for the modeling of medical dilemmas. In: Proceedings 16th Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care, 1992; 349-53.
19. Egar J, Puerta A, Musen MA. Graph-grammar assistance for modeling of decisions. Technical report. Stanford University: Knowledge Systems Laboratory 1992.
20. Goettler H. Semantic description by two-level graph grammars for quasi-hierarchical graphs. In: Nagl M, Schneider HJ, eds. Proceedings of the Workshop on Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science. Munich: Hanser Verlag 1979; 207-26.
21. Cormen TH, Leiserson CE, Rivest RL. Introductions to Algorithms. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT-Press 1990.
22. Johnson SC. Yacc: Yet another compiler compiler. Technical Report 32. New Jersey: AT&T Bell Laboratories 1975.
23. Bischoff Km. Ox: An Attribute-Grammar Compiling System based on Yacc, Lex and C: User Reference Manual, November 1993.
24. Giarratano J, Riley G. Expert Systems. Principles and Programming. Boston MA: PWS Publishing Company 1993.
25. Clancey WJ. Model construction operators. Artificial Intelligence 1992; 53: 1-115.
26. Shortliffe EH, Hubbard SM. Information systems in oncology. In: De Vita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg S, eds. Cancer: Principles and Practise of Oncology, chapter 65. Philadelphia 1989; 2403-12.
27. Shahar Y. A Knowledge-Based Method for Temporal Abstraction of Clinical Data (PhD thesis). Stanford University CA: Departments of Medicine and Computer Science 1994.
28. Haimowitz IJ, Kohane IS. Automated trend detection with multiple temporal hypotheses. In. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1995) 1993: 146-51.
29. Rector AL, Kay S. Descriptive models for medical records and data interchange. In: Barber B, Cao D, Quin D, Wagner G, eds. MEDINFO 89. Amsterdam: North-Holland 1989; 230-4.
30. Heathfield H, Hardiker N, Kirby J, Tallis R, Gonsolkarale M. The PEN & PAD medical record model: Development of a nursing record for hospital-based care of the elderly. Meth Inform Med 1994; 33: 464-72.
31. Campbell KE, Musen MA. Representing of clinical data using SNOMED III and conceptual graphs. In: Frisse EM, ed. SCAMC 92. New York: McGraw-Hill 1992; 354-8.
32. Campbell KE, Das AK, Musen MA. A logical foundation for representation of clinical data. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 1994; 1: 218-32.
33. Sowa JF. Conceptual Structures. Reading MA: Addison Wesley 1984.
34. Ellis G, Levinson RA, Robinson PJ. Managing complex objects in PEIRCE. Intern J Human-Comput Stud 1994; 41: 109-48.