Comparing paracervical with direct infiltration of lignocaine for cervical laser surgery

Journal of Gynecologic Surgery

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 197-199

  Johnson, Nicholas ^a,b   Crompton, Archibald C ^a   Doodek, Ursula ^a  

^a ST JAMES S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b LEEDS GENERAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIDOCAINE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CARBON DIOXIDE LASER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLPOSCOPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LASER SURGERY; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REGIONAL PERFUSION; SCORING SYSTEM; UTERINE CERVIX DYSPLASIA; UTERINE CERVIX EPITHELIUM;

EID: 0029985134     PISSN: 10424067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/gyn.1996.12.197     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Johnson N, Crompton AC. Who finds cervical laser therapy painful? Gynecol Oncol 1994;52:44.
2. Editorial. Is cervical laser therapy painful? Lancet 1989; 1:89.
3. Lee ETC, Ozumba EN, Bevan JR. A randomised trial of citanest with octopressin for relief of pain associated with laser vaporisation of the cervix. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1986;93:967.
4. Rogstad KE, White DJ, Ahmed Jushelf IH. Efficacy of lignocaine analgesia during treatment to the cervix. Lancet 1992;2:942.
5. Johnson N, Crompton AC, Ramsden SVB. The efficacy of para-cervical injections of lignocaine before laser ablation of the cervical transformation zone. A randomised placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989:96:1410.