Ohio's options for elders initiative: Cutting corners or the cutting edge?

Journal of Case Management

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 12-18

  Pepe, M Christiane ^a   Applebaum, Robert A ^a  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ELDERLY CARE; FINANCE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HOME CARE; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; TELEPHONE; UNITED STATES;

AGED; CASE MANAGEMENT; COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; COST CONTROL; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HEALTH SERVICES FOR THE AGED; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; LONG-TERM CARE; MALE; OHIO; PROGRAM EVALUATION; TRIAGE;

EID: 0029982007     PISSN: 10613706     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Applebaum, R. (1995). The future of community-based long-term care. Advisory Panel Report and Recommendations. Syracuse, NY: National Academy on Aging.
2. Applebaum, R., & Austin, C. D. (1990). Long-term care case management: Design and evaluation. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
3. Applebaum, R., Ciferri, W., Riley, T., & Molfenter, C. (1991). Evaluation of the implementation of Ohio's "Options for Elders" Demonstration. Oxford, OH: Scripps Gerontology Center.
4. Geron, S. M., & Chassler, D. (1994, October). Guidelines for long-term care case management practice. A Report of the National Advisory Committee on Long-Term Care Case Management. Bristol, CT: Connecticut Community Care, Inc.
5. Justice, D., Folkemer, D., Donohoe, E. A., & Nelson, H. R. (1991). The integral role of case management in authorizing services under state community care programs. Washington, DC: National Association of State Units on Aging.
6. Kemper, P., Applebaum, R., & Harrigan, M. (1987). A systematic comparison of community care demonstrations. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Institute for Research on Poverty.
7. United States General Accounting Office. (1993, April). Long-term-care case management: State experiences and implications for federal policy (Report No. GAO/HRD93-52). Washington, DC: Author.