Supervision as an analytic experience

Psychoanalytic Quarterly

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 693-710

  Pegeron, Jean Paul ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COUNTER TRANSFERENCE; EXPERIENCE; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PSYCHOANALYSIS; TRANSFERENCE;

EID: 0029981142     PISSN: 00332828     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/21674086.1996.11927512     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. ABRAMS, S. (1993). Reflections on supervisory models. News from COPE, The American Psychoanalytic Association, Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 4-6.
2. ADELSON, M. J. (1995). Clinical supervision of therapists with difficult-to-treat patients. Bull. Menning. Clin., 59:32-52.
3. ARLOW, J. A. (1963). The supervisory situation. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 11:576-594.
4. BAUDRY, F. D. (1993). The personal dimension and management of the supervisory situation with a special note on the parallel process. Psychoanal. Q., 62:588-614.
5. BOESKY, D. (1990). The psychoanalytic process and its components Psychoanal Q., 59:550-584.
6. DEBELL, D. E. (1963). A critical digest of the literature on psychoanalytic supervision. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 11:546-575.
7. _ (1981). Supervisory styles and positions. In Becoming a Psychoanalyst: A Study of Psychoanalytic Supervision, ed. Robert S. Wallerstein. New York: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 39-60.
8. DOEHRMAN, M. J. G. (1976). Parallel processes in supervision and psychotherapy. Bull. Menning. Clin., 40:9-104.
9. EKSTEIN, R. & WALLERSTEIN, R. S. (1958). The Teaching and Learning of Psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
10. FRIJLING-SCHREUDER, E. C. M. (1970). On individual supervision. Int. J. Psychoanal., 51:363-370.
11. GARDNER, R. (1993). Reflections on the study group experience and on supervising. News from COPE, The American Psychoanalytic Association, Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 6-7.
12. GEDIMAN, H. K. & WOLKENFELD, F. (1980). The parallelism phenomenon in psychoanalysis and supervision: its reconsideration as a triadic system. Psychoanal. Q., 49:234-255.
13. GOODMAN, S. (1993). Reflections on the Scope Study Group on Supervision. News from COPE, The American Psychoanalytic Association, Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-4.
14. HOLTZMAN, D. (1993). Personal communication.
15. LEBOVICI, S. (1970). Technical remarks on the supervision of psychoanalytic treatment. Int. J. Psychoanal., 51:385-392.
16. OBERMAN, N. C. (1990). Supervision and the achievement of an analytic identity. In Psychoanalytic Approaches to Supervision, ed. Robert C. Lane. New York: Brunner/ Mazel, pp. 194-206.
17. ORGEL, S. (1989). Address to the board on professional standards. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 37:531-541.
18. ORNSTEIN, P. H. (1995). Psychoanalysis in search of a coherent pedagogy. Amer. Psychoanalyst, 29:19.
19. PANEL (1956). The technique of supervised analysis. S. Keiser, reporter. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 4:539-549.
20. _ (1957). The technique of supervised analysis. P. Sloane, reporter. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 5:539-547.
21. SACHS, D. M. & SHAPIRO, S. H. (1976). On parallel processes in therapy and teaching. Psychoanal. Q., 45:394-415.
22. SARNAT, J. E. (1992). Supervision in relationship: resolving the teach-treat controversy in psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanal. Psychol., 9:387-404.
23. SCHLESINGER, H. J. (1981). General principles of psychoanalytic supervision. In Becoming a Psychoanalyst: A Study of Psychoanalytic Supervision, ed. Robert S. Wallerstein. New York: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 29-38.
24. SOLNIT, A. J. (1970). Learning from psychoanalytic supervision. Int. J. Psychoanal., 51:359-362.
25. WAGNER, F. F. (1957). Supervision of psychotherapy. Amer. J. Psychother., 11:759-768.
26. WYMAN, H. M. & RITTENBERG, S. M. (1992). The analysing instrument of Otto Isakower, M.D. Evolution of a concept. J. Clin. Psychoanal., 1:165-316.