Cardiac pacemaker dysfunction due to interference from outside sources: A review;LES DYSFONCTIONS DE STIMULATEUR CARDIAQUE SECONDAIRES A DES INTERFERENCES EXTERIEURES: UNE MISE AU POINT

Schweizerische Medizinische Wochenschrift

Volumn 126, Issue 17, 1996, Pages 723-733

  Grobety M ^a   Perret, F ^a   Schlaepfer, J ^a   Kappenberger, L ^a  

^a LAUSANNE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEFIBRILLATION; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HUMAN; PACEMAKER FAILURE; REVIEW;

BIOPHYSICS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION THERAPY; ELECTRICITY; ELECTROCOAGULATION; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; HUMANS; LITHOTRIPSY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICROWAVES; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL; RADIOTHERAPY; TELECOMMUNICATIONS;

EID: 0029979468     PISSN: 00367672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Kay GN: Basic aspects of cardiac pacing. In: Ellenbogen KA (éd): Cardiac pacing. Boston: Blackwell, 1992: 20-35.
2. Aubert AE, Goldreyer BN, Wyman ME, Jacquemlyn E, Ector H, De Geest H: Filter characteristics of the sensing circuits of a rate responsive pacemaker. To see or not to see. Pace 1989; 12: 525-536.
3. Furman S: Electromagnetic interference. Pace 1982; 5: 1.
4. Wahlen RE, Starmer F, McIntosch HD: Electric hazards associated with cardiac pacing. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1964; 11: 992.
5. Carleton RA, Session RW, Graettinger JS: Environmental influences on implantable cardiac pacemakers. JAMA 1964; 190: 160.
6. Furman S, Parker B, Krauthamer M: The influence of electromagnetic environment on the performance of artificial cardiac pacemakers. Ann Thorac Surg 1968; 6: 90.
7. Bridges JE, Frazier MJ: The effect of 60 Hz electric and magnetic fields on implanted cardiac pacemakers. Epri EA-1174 Project 679-1 Final report, Chicago 1979.
8. Irnich W: Interference in pacemakers. Pace 1984; 7: 1021-1048.
9. Irnich W, Barold S: Interference protection in cardiac pacemakers. In: Barold S (éd): Modern cardiac pacing. New York; Futura Publishing Co., 1985.
10. Irnich W: Engineering considerations on the controversy «Unipolar versus bipolar». Pace 1988; 11: 510.
11. Toivenen L, Valjus J, Hongisto M, Metso R: The influence of elevated 50 Hz electric and magnetic fields on implanted cardiac pacemakers: the role of the lead configuration and programming of the sensitivity. Pace 1991; 14: 2114-2122.
12. Wehr M, Schmitt CG, Kohler F, Crayen P: Abnormal pacing following defibrillation exit block after micro dislocation of the electrode. Z Kardiol 1980; 69: 844-846.
13. Gould L, Patel S, Gomes GI: Pacemaker failure following external defibrillation. Pace 1981; 4: 575.
14. Gredwoyn JO: Pacemaker failure following external defibrillation. Circulation 1971; 44: 293.
15. Levine PA, Barold SS, Fletcher RD, Talbot P: Adverse acute and chronic effects of electrical defibrillation and cardioversion on implanted unipolar cardiac pacing systems. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983; 6: 1413-1422.
16. Schoenfeld MH: Follow up of the pacemaker patient. In: Ellenbogen KA (éd): Cardiac pacing. Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1992: 124-138.
17. Chauvin M, Crenner F, Brechenmacher: Etude in vitro du comportement des stimulateurs cardiaques soumis à un courant de haute fréquence. Arch Mal Cœur 1990; 83: 997-1002.
18. Kaye GC, Butrous GS, Allen A, Meldrum SJ, Male JC, Camm AJ: The effect of 50 Hz external electrical interference on implanted cardiac pacemakers. Pace 1988; 11: 999-1008.
19. Lukas EH, Johnson D, McElroy BP: The effects of electronic article surveillance systems on permanent cardiac pacemakers: an in vitro study (part II). Pace 1994; 17: 2021-2026.
20. Beaugeard D, Kacet S, Bricout M, Camblin J: Interférences entre les stimulateurs cardiaques et les détecteurs de vol dans les magasins. Arch Mal Cœur 1992; 85: 1457-1461.
21. Copperman Y, Zarfati D, Laniado S: The effect of metal detector gates on implanted permanent pacemaker. Pace 1988; 11: 1386-1387.
22. Report of the American Urological Association ad hoc Committee to study the safety and efficacy of current technology of percutaneous lithotripsy and non invasive lithotripsy. American Urological Association, May 1986.
23. Langberg J, Abber J, Thuroff JW, Griffin JC: The effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on pacemaker functions. Pace 1987; 10: 1142-1146.
24. Cooper D, Wilkoff B, Masterson M, Castle L, Belco K et al.: Effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on cardiac pacemakers and its safety in patients with implanted pacemakers. Pace 1988; 11: 1607-1616.
25. Holmes DR, Hayes DL, Gray JE, Merideth J: The effects of magnetic resonance imaging on implantable pulse generators. Pace 1986; 9: 360-370.
26. Cazeau S, Theret D, Lascault G, Gougne G, Ritter P, Ripart A: Environnement et stimulation cardiaque définitive. Arch Mal Cœur 1992; 85: 3-12.
27. Naegeli B, Deola M, Eicher B, Osswald S: Pacemaker dysfunction caused by interference with Natel-D mobile phones. Pace 1995; 18 (Suppl. II): 842.
28. Adamec R: Damaging effect of therapeutic radiation on programmable pacemakers. Pace 1982; 5: 146.
29. Maxted KJ: The effects of therapeutic X-radiation on a sample of pacemaker generators. Phys Med Biol 1984; 29: 1143.
30. Venselaar JLM, Van Kerkoerle HLJM, Vet AJTM: Radiation damage to pacemakers from radiotherapy. Pace 1987; 10: 538-542.
31. Lauck G, Von Smekal A, Wolke S, Seelos KC, Jung W et al.: Effects of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging on cardiac pacemakers. Pace 1995; 18: 1549-1555.
32. Rodriguez F, Filimonov A, Henning A, Coughlin C, Greenberg M: Radiation-induced effects in multiprogrammable pacemakers and implantable defibrillators. Pace 1991; 14: 2143-2153.