Designs for interference

Biometrics

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 597-606

  David, Olivier ^a,b   Kempton, Rob A ^c  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b INSTITUT DE MATHÉMATIQUES DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^c BIOMATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS SCOTLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Block design; Interplot competition; Mean square error; Neighbor design; Recovery of interblock information; Restricted randomization; Treatment bias

Indexed keywords

BLOCK DESIGNS; INTERPLOT COMPETITION; MEANS SQUARE ERRORS; NEIGHBOR DESIGN; PRIOR INFORMATION; RECOVERY OF INTERBLOCK INFORMATION; RESTRICTED RANDOMIZATION; TREATMENT BIAS; TREATMENT DESIGN;

MEAN SQUARE ERROR;

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC ASPECT; FEEDING; PLANT; RANDOMIZATION; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 0029978957     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2532898     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Azaïs, J.-M., Bailey, R. A., and Monod, H. (1993). A catalogue of efficient neighbour designs with border plots. Biometrics 49, 1252-1261.
2. Bailey, R. A. and Rowley, C. A. (1987). Valid randomization. Proceedings of the Royal Society A 410, 105-124.
3. Besag, J. and Kempton, R. (1986). Statistical analysis of field experiments using neighbouring plots. Biometrics 42, 231-251.
4. Cochran, W. G., Autrey, K. M., and Cannon, C. Y. (1941). A change-over design for dairy cattle feeding experiments. Journal of Dairy Science 24, 937-951.
5. Cox, D. R. (1958). Planning of Experiments. New York: Wiley.
6. David, O., Kempton, R. A., and Nevison, I. M. (1996). Designs for controlling interplot competition in variety trials. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, in press.
7. Finney, D. J. (1956). Cross-over designs in bioassay. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 145, 42-61.
8. Gill, P. S. (1993). Design and analysis of field experiments incorporating local and remote effects of treatments. Biometrical Journal 35, 343-354.
9. John, J. A. (1987). Cyclic Designs. London: Chapman and Hall.
10. Jones, B. and Kenward, M. G. (1989). The Analysis of Cross-over Trials. London: Chapman and Hall.
11. Kempton, R. A. (1992). Interference in agricultural experiments. Proceedings of the 2nd Meeting of the Biometric Society, East, Central and Southern African Network, Harare, Zimbabwe, 1-19.
12. Kempton, R. A. and Lockwood, G. (1984). Inter-plot competition in variety trials of field beans (Vicia faba L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 103, 293-302.
13. Kempton, R. A., Gregory, R. S., Hughes, W. G., and Stoehr, P. J. (1986). The effect of interplot competition on yield assessment in triticale trials. Euphytica 35, 257-265.
14. McGhee, J. (1995). Myrtle oil keeps bloodsucking midge at bay. New Scientist 1984, 20.
15. Monod, H. (1996). Valid randomization for models with neighbour effects from treatments. Statistics 27, 311-324.
16. Muir, D. D. and Hunter, E. A. (1992). Sensory evaluation of Cheddar cheese: order of tasting and carryover effects. Food Quality and Preference 3, 141-145.
17. Nelder, J. A. (1965). The analysis of randomized experiments with orthogonal block structure. Proceedings of the Royal Society A 283, 147-178.
18. Patterson, H. D., Williams, E. R., and Hunter, E. R. (1978). Block designs for variety trials. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 395-400.
19. Pearce, S. C. (1957). Experimenting with organisms as blocks. Biometrika 44, 141-149.
20. Street, A. P. and Street, D. J. (1987). Combinatorics of Experimental Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Williams, E. J. (1962). The analysis of competition experiments. Australian Journal of Biological Science 15, 509-525.