Individual differences in sugar consumption predict amphetamine-induced dopamine overflow in nucleus accumbens

European Journal of Pharmacology

Volumn 303, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 177-181

  Sills, Terrence L ^a   Crawley, Jacqueline N ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

amphetamine; dopamine; individual difference; microdialysis; nucleus accumbens; rat

Indexed keywords

AMPHETAMINE; DOPAMINE; SUGAR;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOPAMINE RELEASE; FOOD INTAKE; HISTOLOGY; INDIVIDUALITY; INTRAPERITONEAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MALE; MESOLIMBIC DOPAMINERGIC SYSTEM; MICRODIALYSIS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT;

EID: 0029974225     PISSN: 00142999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(96)00161-6     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Glick, S.D., C. Merski, S. Steindorf, S. Wang, R.W. Keller and J.N. Carlson, 1992, Neurochemical predisposition to self-administer morphine in rats, Brain Res. 578, 215.
2. Hernandez, L. and B.G. Hoebel, 1988, Feeding and hypothalamic stimulation increase dopamine turnover in the accumbens, Physiol. Behav. 44, 599.
3. Hooks, M.S. and P.W. Kalivas, 1994, Involvement of dopamine and excitatory amino acid transmission in novelty-induced motor activity, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 269, 976.
4. Hooks, M.S., G.H. Jones, A.D. Smith, D.B. Neill and J.B. Justice Jr., 1991a, Individual differences in locomotor activity and sensitization, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 38, 467.
5. Hooks, M.S., G.H. Jones, A.D. Smith, D.B. Neill and J.B. Justice Jr., 1991b, Response to novelty predicts the locomotor and nucleus accumbens dopamine response to cocaine, Synapse 9, 121.
6. Hooks, M.S., A.C. Colvin, J.L. Juncos and J.B. Justice, Jr., 1992, Individual differences in basal and cocaine-stimulated extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens using quantitative microdialysis, Brain Res. 587, 306.
7. 2 receptors and mRNAs, J. Neurosci. 14, 6144.
8. Hurd, Y.L. and U. Ungerstedt, 1988, Cocaine: an in vivo microdialysis evaluation of its acute action on dopamine transmission in rat striaturn, Synapse 3, 48.
9. Kelly, P.H., P.W. Seviour and S.D. Iversen, 1975, Amphetamine and apomorphine responses in the rat following 6-OHDA lesions of the nucleus accumbens septi and corpus striatum, Brain Res. 94, 507.
10. Lyness, W.H., N.M. Friedle and K.E. Moore, 1979, Destruction of dopaminergic nerve terminals in nucleus accumbens: effect on d-amphetamine self-administration, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 11, 553.
11. Paxinos, G. and C. Watson, 1982, The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Atlas (Academic Press, New York).
12. Piazza, P.V., J.M. Deminiere, M. Le Moal and H. Simon, 1989, Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration, Science 245, 1511.
13. Piazza, P.V., F. Rogue-Pont, J.M. Deminiere, M. Kharouby, M. Le Moal and H. Simon, 1991, Dopaminergic activity is reduced in the prefrontal cortex and increased in the nucleus accumbens of rats predisposed to develop amphetamine self-administration, Brain Res. 567, 169.
14. Sills, T.L. and F.J. Vaccarino, 1994, Individual differences in sugar intake predict the locomotor response to acute and repeated amphetamine administration, Psychopharmacology 116, 1.